Human Population Academy

Frequently Asked Questions

(Note: on some browsers you must click the “+” sign to the left of each question to see the answers.)


-Scientific psychology and researcher’s, author of scientific discovery Andrey Davydov’s finding of the answer to the question “What is human psyche and what is its structure?” in one of the most ancient texts preserved in our civilization.
People of this civilization have long been convinced that each one of them is unknowable. This is not surprising since it is much easier for "the powerful ones" to control ignorant masses in order to use them. However, Homo sapiens was created in such a way that he does not stop being interested in what he is, and how his psychophysiology*—the sum of psyche and body—is arranged, despite that this interest could not find satisfaction for many centuries. Religion offered quite an amusing, to put it mildly, vision of these issues, and psychology, until recently, was unable to provide authentic information to the most elementary questions of an individual, such as "Who am I?", "What am I?" For none of the existing methods, which psychologists have, despite their variety, allowed to look inside the human soul.
Although psychologists tried to find a way out of this situation, from our point of view—these attempts were quite unsuccessful. Contrary to that words ‘soul’ and ‘psyche’ are synonymous (from the Ancient Greek ψυχικός "soul, soulful," from ψυχή—"soul"), representatives of scientific psychology separated them without much hesitation. Soul was taken out of the scope of their studies, declared a phantom and left to religion, while under the label "psyche" they began to study anything at all: "phenomena of consciousness", "direct experience of the subject," his behavior, intellect, etc. It got to that intellect was practically announced to be the soul. That is, psychologists are not even aware of that intellect is not psyche, but only a part of psyche. Moreover, it is a secondary part (more on this will be presented below).
All in all, it turns out that the science of psychology was never a science because it never had and does not have any idea about the subject of its study—the soul, psyche. Moreover, it persistently ignores its subject, even though "psychology" translated from the Ancient Greek means "science of the soul" (from the Ancient Greek ψυχή—"soul"; λόγος—"teaching"). Scientific status of psychology not only became the topic of extensive debates, but also is denied by psychologists themselves. As noted by A. V. Yurevich (the deputy director of the Institute of Psychology of Russian Academy of Sciences) in 2005, psychology occupies an intermediate position between science and pseudoscience. And, surprisingly, psychologists are fine with this.
However, despite everything, at the end of the XX century answers to questions "What is human psyche and what is its structure?" and many others—were found. To put it simply: the human soul was opened liked a tin can. Scientists decrypted one of the most ancient texts preserved in this civilization, and it turned out that this book contains a detailed description of the structure and mechanisms of work of human psyche. (Or human soul, whatever you prefer.)
The name of this ancient Chinese monument is 山海經 (Shānhǎi Jīng, Shan Hai Jing, translated as the Catalog of Mountains and Seas, Book of Mountains and Seas). Precise dating of this text is still not available, but some researchers date it XXIII century BC**. In the 1970s of the XX century, that is—almost 40 centuries after the presumptive appearance of the above-mentioned text in this civilization, sinologist and researcher of ancient books Andrey Davydov posed a question: "What is the Catalog of Mountains and Seas? Is it an unclear treatise or the richest collection of images, which are directly related to a human and his psyche?" This question was not empty because images of strange beings, often of chimerical nature, remained in practically all cultures of the world, but nowhere, except for in the Catalog of Mountains and Seas, these images were systematized into something whole that could be called a catalog. And, Andrey Davydov found the answer to this question. Shan Hai Jing indeed turned out to be a map of psychophysiological structure of Homo sapiens—the Catalog of human population.
This ancient source was qualified as the Catalog of the human population on the basis of the fact that Andrey Davydov found in it detailed descriptions of 293 archetypal structures of human psyche. This clearly indicated that the biological type "human" is divided into subtypes (subspecies), and Shan Hai Jing describes the psychophysiological arrangement of each one of them, similar to catalogs, encyclopedias about animals, anatomical atlases, etc.
In the course of many years (from 1975 to 1995) of research, Andrey Davydov not only managed to create a unique technology for decryption of Shan Hai Jing, but also decrypted the information found in this book. This information included description of the arrangement and work of psychophysiology of 293 human subtypes, as well as details about the natural toolkit for managing a human in the form of descriptions of natural manipulation modes for each subtype, and a lot of other interesting information related to natural arrangement of Homo sapiens.
It became clear that the opinion (which is still widespread) that at the moment of birth a human is "a tabula rasa" ("a blank slate"), on which anyone, including himself, could write anything that he pleases, like on a blank sheet of paper, is a fallacy. Detailed descriptions of 293 structures of human psyche, which were discovered in the ancient Chinese monument, clearly demonstrated that every person is born with a natural program, in which everything is implanted: what he will be like, how he will live, down to the smallest details. It turned out that the soul does exist. And, it is not some kind of unknowable value or a phantom. Using the computer terms, the soul (psyche) is the "software" of Homo sapiens.
One’s own soul or the soul of another is no longer a mystery because from descriptions, which were discovered in Shan Hai Jing, it is possible to obtain any kind of information about any one of over 7,000,000,000 representatives of the biological type Homo sapiens living on this planet. However, it is not a mystery only to those, who have access to decrypted information from this ancient book. The rest still have to ask psychologists and society: "Who am I? What am I?" and receive absurdity and someone's imagination in response.
In parallel, psychology got a chance to be called science. After all, owing to many years of research work carried out by Andrey Davydov, answers to questions "What is the soul (psyche) of a human and what is its structure?" were found. They were discovered in the Catalog of human population, which turned out to be ancient writings, heritage of our ancestors or maybe our creators because the authorship of this book is undetermined. Decryption of Shan Hai Jing, as translation from the language of ancient images into the language of modern descriptions of life and functioning of 293 human subtypes, formed the basis for the Non-traditional Psychoanalysis, as a new direction in scientific psychology. This direction factually made it a science.
However, something else is more important. With the return of the Catalog of human population to this civilization, every person living on earth (and their descendants) has a chance to become a human. Currently, there is not a single human (according to the meaning of this word, which is recorded in the catalog that describes humanity) present on this planet. Ancient writings clearly state that one is not born a human, but one can become a human with the help of a certain, specific method—learning; learning as studying and mastering one’s own natural "software." Moreover, this includes going through multiple levels of development. However, it is not possible to become a human without the "textbook" called the Catalog of Mountains and Seas.
*We use the term "psychophysiology" because for us the issue, which is still being discussed by psychologists—"What is primary: psyche or physiology?"—has long been settled. We know that psyche is primary. However, having no relation to religion, we do not separate the body and the soul, and we do not consider the soul as something that exists by itself, apart from the body. And, in fact, this is not our personal opinion—this also is information from ancient books, which appeared long before Torah, Bible, and so on.
** To date, no one knows for sure who gave and preserved this knowledge, but after it was written down it got the title 山海經 Shan Hai Jing (translated from Chinese as Canon/Catalog of Mountains and Seas).
According to Artem I. Kobzev (a Russian historian of Chinese philosophy, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, professor, author of over eight hundred scientific papers on the history of Chinese philosophy, science and culture), Shan Hai Jing is an anonymous monument, which presumably dates back to the late III century BC-early II century BC. It consists of eighteen juan (scrolls), combined into two sections: Canon/Book of the Mountains (Shan Jing) or Canon of Five Innermost Mountains (Wu Zang Jing) in five juan and Canon of the Seas (Hai Jing) in thirteen juan.
Legend claims that Shan Hai Jing was engraved on sacred vessels by Bo Yi—an assistant to the wise semi-mythical ruler of the ancient times Yu the Great, who lived in the XXIII century BC. Yu the Great entered the throne in 2205 BC. Authors of the Han epoch attribute authorship of the literary monument Shan Hai Jing to Yu the Great and his companion Bo Yi.
According to legend, Yu the Great dealt with a great flood, which fell upon earth and arranged it. The deedful ruler allegedly came to know its mountains, rivers, their spirits, as well as animals and plants. He ordered his assistant to describe everything that was seen. As a result, these recordings together with images of spirits, fantastic animals, birds and plants were engraved on nine ritual vessels-tripods. Later on, these sacred vessels were lost. However, according to historical annals, prior to their strange disappearance, the text of the Catalog of Mountains and Seas, along with amazing images of representatives of flora and fauna, spirits and deities were copied.
This answers the question why some date Shan Hai Jing back to III-II centuries BC, while others back to XXIII century BC—the Catalog of Mountains and Seas as the source of information appeared during the time of Yu the Great and it got the form of a text much later. We tend to agree with those researchers, who date Shan Hai Jing back to XXIII BC since according to Dan Zhu the Catalog of Mountains and Sea was recorded only after its long-term oral existence (this point of view is expressed in his commentaries to the famous monument Spring and Autumn - Chunqiu). Reports that Yu the Great and his assistant Bo Yi created the Catalog of Mountains and Seas exist in, for example, Wang Chong’s (27-97 AD) treatise titled Critical Essays: "When Yu and Bo Yi were taming the waters of the flood—Yu was engaged in calming the water, while Bo Yi in recording information about various "things." And, they created the Catalog of Mountains and Seas."
We will add that apparently in mythologies of almost all cultures of the world (those, which to continue to exist, as well as those, which already sank into oblivion) exist facts, which show that the Catalog of human population was present in these cultures. This is not difficult to trace by carefully studying the ancient, archaic cultural layers. However, the source itself was preserved only in one culture—the culture of China. This is not surprising since Chinese culture is not only ancient, but also, in spite of everything, the Chinese manage to preserve it and their traditions from the ancient times to the present day (unlike representatives of other cultures).
-What is the soul (psyche) of a human and what is the Catalog of human population?
Soul (psyche) of a human is an archetypal matrix. Or, if we draw an analogy with a computer, "a hard disk," on which natural "software" of Homo sapiens is recorded. Every person is born with an individual program and three manipulation modes; this can be defined as "software," based on which he lives, and on the basis of which all his psychophysiology functions.
Since all research related to the Catalog of human population was and is being carried out within a strictly scientific framework, the following is the scientific definition: "The Catalog of human population is a description of a human as a type by subtype structures. Subtype structure (synonyms: “psyche”, “soul”) is a combination of individual archetypes, recorded at the genetic level (principle). Expressions and interaction of subtype structures in manipulation modes and phenological algorithms are described with adjustments for gender, age and cultural differences. Information is recorded on six factors." This definition was formulated and introduced by Andrey Davydov—the author of the discovery and decryption of the Catalog of human population.
-Homo sapiens is a biological type divided into 293 subtypes.
The basis for cataloging of the "human" biological type was the discovery of existence of subtypes within this type. This discovery was made by the researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov. It turned out that there are 293 subtypes of Homo sapiens. Each of them, using the language of science, is endemic. That is, representatives of one subtype cardinally differ from representatives of any other subtype due to particularities of arrangement and work of psychophysiology, qualities and characteristics, life algorithms, functional range, and abilities.
-How does a representative of one human subtype of Homo sapiens differ from a representative of another subtype?
It has long been noted that even though people are physiologically similar in principle (for example, they have two arms, two legs, two lungs, one heart, and do not have scales, a tail, horns, hooves, wings, feathers, etc.), they differ from each other in character, qualities of personality, life algorithms, values, preferences, and abilities. And, sometimes they differ cardinally On the other hand, there are people, who are similar to one another. This question remained a mystery to researchers for a long time, but with the discovery of the Catalog of human population it was resolved. It turned out that the reason is that humanity as a biological type is divided into subtypes.
It is exactly the same as it is arranged in the world of animals, birds, fish, plants, etc. Among birds exist hummingbirds, and eagles, and sparrows, and ostriches; among fish there is a shark, and a carp, and a guppy or a dwarf pygmy goby; among snakes there are anacondas, and vipers, and grass snakes; among dogs there are huge Great Danes, and miniature Italian Greyhounds. And, as it is known, anacondas do not live like vipers, sharks like carps, and Great Danes like Italian Greyhounds—they all lead different lifestyles, have different qualities, functionalities, and abilities. As it turned out, it is the same within the biological type Homo sapiens.
-How does one individual differ from another, as representatives of the same subtype of Homo sapiens?
In principle, they do not differ in anything. Externally, representatives of the same human subtype, unlike animals of the same subtype, might differ, including by the color of their skin, for example. However, they have the same qualities of personality, lifestyle, abilities, and functionalities. Despite that externally representatives of one subtype of biological type "human" usually do not look similar, their internal physiological processes are analogous. For example, if we consider the possibility of normal existence in different temperature regimes, then that what is natural and desirable for a representative of one human subtype might be completely unacceptable to a representative of another, etc.
This occurs because all physiological processes are determined by the structure of psyche, and it is identical for all representatives of one human subtype. Representatives of the same subtype of Homo sapiens are born with the same subtype program, and therefore, in terms of psychical structure they are identical. The structure of psyche (subtype program) is a natural imprint, a matrix, and it does not change from individual to individual within a subtype.
Social environment, upbringing, cultural traditions, and education introduce some adjustments, but they are minor since they do not change the essential—subtype structure ("program") of a person. Real differences between people are defined specifically by the natural subtype program, nothing else.
The study of Shan Hai Jing revealed that every person, belonging to some subtype, has stable characteristic properties of this subtype; and, regardless of race, nationality, place of birth and residence, parental guidance, and so on, as these are only minor correctors, which do not change a subtype program. Though, the same pattern is observed with animals. Living in different areas (as some animal subspecies, as well as human subspecies can be found almost all over the globe), the representatives of the same subtype may have different adaptive properties, but these properties do not in any way alter the subtype program: a horse remains a horse, a bear remains a bear, a bull does not turn into a ram, and a snake does not become a crocodile. Only here it will be a pony, somewhere else a percheron, and elsewhere—an Arabian horse. Regardless of the territory where an animal lives, it retains stable properties of its subtype. We see a similar situation with humans: the representatives of the same human subtype might have different skin color, be of different nationalities, but each retains those personal qualities, life algorithms, preferences, talents, functioning that are inherent in his subtype.
Cultural factors, national traditions, even parental upbringing (which, by the way, plays a big role for representatives of some subtypes) are only additions, layers, and do not alter the subtype program of a human. Since, in the case of biological species Homo sapiens, children are not direct continuation of their parents, as it is the case with animals. More often than not, children and parents are members of different subtypes.
-Why and in which cases children are not antenna-like continuations of their biological parents?
As it turned out with the discovery of the Catalog of human population—since humanity as a biological type is divided into 293 subtypes, having a purely external similarity ("exterior") a child does not inherit natural psychophysiological characteristics of his biological parents, except for when he is a representative of the same subtype as one of his parents (a mother or a father).
In the case of representatives of the biological type "human," children are not antenna-like continuations of their biological parents, as it is the case in the world of animals and plants. In the world of Homo sapiens in most cases parents raise a representative or representatives who are not the same as their own subtype. This is the root cause of the well-known "problem of parents and children." This is why children, even though they resemble their parents externally, in most cases do not get all characteristics and qualities of their characters, do not copy their way of life exactly as it happens in the animal world. And, sometimes they cardinally differ from their parents by nature.
As for similarity of characters, habits, attitudes, etc. observed in parents and children—this has nothing to do with their nature, and is only related to artificial "software." We have fully researched this issue and it is described using popular language in the book called "Ahnenerbe"—Your Killer Is Under Your Skin by A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk.


-Homo sapiens is a bio-robot.
Using scientific terminology, Homo sapiens is a bio-form that has a program on the basis of which it functions in space and time, just like all other bio-forms on planet Earth. In other words, a human is the same bio-robot as all other natural objects.
A human, first of all, is a natural object, an element of the unified natural system. Any animal or plant lives and functions within strict programs. And, our planet itself and other elements of the Solar system are not able to move in space arbitrarily, deviate from their orbits; meaning that they are objects, which are programmed from the beginning.
A human is subject to the same natural laws. Subtype program of Homo sapiens gets activated at the moment of birth of an individual. And, he begins to live strictly according to this program, even if he knows nothing about it. It is the same as it is with, for example, animals and plants, or planets of the Solar system: Earth does not "visit" the orbit of Mars, a fish is not able to arbitrarily begin to live and function like a horse, and an oak cannot stop being an oak and begin to exist like a palm tree.
-Homo sapiens is born with built-in “software”: individual (subtype) program and three manipulation modes.
In essence, the concept of human "software" (or, using scientific terms—"subtype structure" or "individual archetypal pattern"), "psyche," and "soul" are synonymous. The role of human "software" is huge. It is the basis of work of all human psychophysiology.
Human "software" is the natural subtype program of an individual and three manipulation modes as correctors to this program: suppression mode, balance mode and stimulation mode. A program and three manipulation modes are "soldered together," as elements of a unified system called "human psyche." Every human subtype has its own, unique natural program with three manipulation modes. More information about programs and manipulation modes of Homo sapiens will be provided below.
Human "software," using the computer terms, gets "installed" by nature at the time of birth. If we draw an analogy with other technics, an individual program and three manipulation modes of a person are, relatively speaking, "factory settings," meaning that an individual is created by nature specifically like that.
-Natural and artificial “software” of Homo sapiens.
A human and a computer have a similarity: both do not work without software. A computer without "software" is a useless pile of metal; a human without "software" is a body, life in which is supported by automatic physiological processes, but he will never function like a human. Today almost everyone is familiar with computer software, but not many are familiar with human "software." Even though, as it turned out, human "software" is the "soul," which people were looking for so hard for centuries, but could not find.
Human "software" can be natural, as well as artificially created by people themselves.
Nature gives "software" to every person from birth as a base, without which any bio-robot, including a human, cannot live. Without even coming close to that natural "software" is provided by nature to every person from birth, civilization came up with a lot of modifications of artificial "software." People had to live somehow since by nature it is arranged so that a person cannot live without a program at all, and the Catalog human population, where every person could find out his natural program was lost.
However, the trouble is that artificial "software" (meaning, "software" invented by people) differs from natural in the same way as plastic apples differ from natural apples. That is not surprising because even at the current level of technological development of this civilization, a human is not able to create anything that would be equal to natural; quality of that what he creates is always worse. Let’s go back to "plastic apples": such a "diet" quickly leads to death of a human. In this civilization, in the best case, people live for several decades, instead of centuries, as they could live according to studies done by physiologists.
In essence, life based on artificial "software" that replaces the natural program of an individual, turns him into a living corpse while he is still alive. Life on artificial "software" leads to colossally rapid deterioration of the entire human psychophysiology, premature aging and early death. Only a few percent of the potential that is implanted in a person (and, which would allow him to heal and rejuvenate himself) gets realized and a person has nothing else left, but to die from diseases and old age.
And, during the time period between birth and death, for the most part, a person’s life is difficult, full of problems. Is it not this process and result that are described in mythologies of almost all nations of the world: a shift from the Golden Age, in which all people lived for many years, happily and without problems to the Iron Age, tainted and cruel, when "men never rest from labour and sorrow by day, and from perishing by night" (Hesiod, VII-VII century BC, Works and Days, Retrieved March 14, 2015, from
Artificial "software," like hydrochloric acid, corrodes a person from the inside. As it is known, concentrated hydrochloric acid turns contents of a stomach into a bloody mess. A chemical burn of this kind does not always end instantaneously, sometimes doctors save a person by removing the insides, but a person lives the rest of his life severely disabled and dies before his time. And, at any stage a person is in hellish pain because of this. Is this not the same process that we can observe around us: life in misery, and then death, in 100% out of 100 cases?
No person in his lifetime is able to fall outside the scope of his natural program without damage to himself. And, everything that Homo sapiens try to make out of themselves by creating artificial programs, as replacements of their natural programs, in terms of nature are mutations. In nature all mutants automatically "go under the knife." Automatically—means that if functioning of an individual falls outside the scope of his natural program, then nature automatically regards this as a threat to existence of the whole natural system, and the program of self-destruction automatically turns on in that individual.
Probably, this is why lives of Homo sapiens in this civilization are so short. After all, according to physiologists—by nature a human body is designed for a healthy, normal and youthful life of a few hundred years. And, this is confirmed by the ancient sources; for example, in descriptions of lives of biblical characters, which most people are familiar with. One of them—Methuselah—lived 969 years according to some sources. Or is the Bible wrong?
Artificial "software" is the root of absolutely any problem of an individual, as well as society as a whole. "Software" created by a human for himself and for other people can be compared to the most dangerous computer virus, which breaks the entire system; to a virus, which there is not a single chance to get rid of, except for doing "a factory reset," cleaning "the disk" called "the soul" of everything extraneous, everything that is not related to the natural "software." And, today this is possible since the Catalog of human population, which is the collection of descriptions of human programs, was found and returned to civilization.
Artificial schemes that people come up with as programs for life are unable to completely turn off their natural "software." Simultaneous work of both natural and artificial "software," first of all, makes the life of an individual very uncomfortable, as these two "programs" come into a conflict, which does not end until death. Secondly, this is very similar to trying to sit on two chairs at once. And, the result is the same. Trying to resolve this conflict, but not knowing his natural program, at some point an individual completely switches over to artificial "software." The trouble is that when he "succeeds"—he dies right away; a person is alive only while his natural program works. Therefore, natural "software" of people, which is described in the Catalog of human population, always corresponds to real people. And, this is easily observable.


-Why know the natural individual (subtype) program of a human?
Characteristics of species and subspecies of animals and plants, which are different by nature, make it possible to classify and describe them in encyclopedias. This, in turn, allows a person to obtain information about a certain natural object or phenomenon from encyclopedias, reference books and other catalogs. For example, from catalogs of animals—it is possible to learn the natural qualities of each of them, how they look, how they live, what they eat, how they reproduce, etc.
Prior to creation of such catalogs, a human had to learn this "on his own skin." Encyclopedias (catalogs), which describe the world of nature, relieved people from having to learn on their own that some animals can damage or even kill, that plants can be very poisonous, and that water in nature is not only a brook or a calmly flowing river, but also vertiginous currents, swamps that suck in deep, huge ocean waves, floods, etc. Without an encyclopedia, from which it is possible to easily find out about any person, the same thing happens to those, who without having knowledge about the true nature of their fellow biological species try to come into contact with them. People's lives are full of troubles, dangers and damages because they do not know qualities and functionalities of people with whom they communicate.
After all, as it turned out, human natural programs are a mix of properties of real objects of nature: animals, plants, mountains, valleys, rivers, lakes, swamps, streams, rocks, minerals, soils, metals, and much more. And, among them there are not only peaceful rabbits or sparrows, but also tigers, wild boars, poisonous snakes or insects; not only quiet rivers and lakes, but also rapidly flowing streams; not only carps, but piranhas and sharks; not only buttercups and daisies, but plants, like, for example, manchineel or Cerberus. And, for example, without knowledge of natural properties of manchineel, if a person hides under its branches from the rain—drops with mixed-in poisonous milky sap will fall from the tree onto that person, and he will become covered with blisters from head to toe.
Therefore, without the Catalog of human population every person has a lot of problems throughout life. These problems never end because he is always among people. And, people in this civilization do everything to hide their true qualities of personality, their natural functionalities behind numerous cover ups and masks. Under the guise of a white lamb or a beautiful flower can hide anyone and anything. As a result, figuratively speaking, a person without knowledge of individual (subtype) programs of other people, first steps on the tail of a poisonous snake and it bites him, then gets sucked into a swamp, then a rock hits him on the head, then he gets ripped by poisonous thorns, then he finds himself in a tornado zone or even paws of a tiger.
For a long time Homo sapiens remained one of the few biological objects, which was not arranged systematically by subtype structures in an encyclopedia. Of course, some encyclopedias about a human existed, for example, anatomical atlases. However, one could not get information about what this or that person is like, let alone how to come into contact, interact with him. But now the biological type "human" is classified due to that researcher-sinologist A. Davydov discovered detailed descriptions of 293 human subtypes in the ancient manuscript titled Shan Hai Jing, which is why this book was named the Catalog of human population.
The Catalog of human population is an encyclopedia of Homo sapiens, from which it is possible to obtain detailed descriptions of people. From this directory one can easily find out the natural individual (subtype) program of any of over 7 billion people living on planet Earth.
Consideration of each person as a representative of one of the subtypes allows to find out any information about him/her using minimal form data, only by the date of his/her birth. This is very convenient. The Catalog of human population allows to obtain any information about a person on all six factors: what this person is like in the intellectual sphere, how he/she thinks, at what rate and in which algorithms, what his/her interests are, etc.; what, when, where and how he/she eats; what are his/her physical parameters, abilities, etc.; what emotional manifestations are normal for him/her, how powerful they are, how and in which situations he/she expresses emotions, etc.; what are his/her sexual preferences, sexual potential, how it gets expressed, in what forms, with which partners, under what conditions and algorithms, etc.; in what geographical area, type of housing, interior, conditions he/she prefers to live; what his/her natural talents are, how they can be realized (including professional activity, although not necessarily); how he/she communicates with others, on what bases, what he/she seeks, by which methods, and what other people should be fearful of with him/her; and so on.
To know the natural individual (subtype) program of a person means to know all his/her hidden "motivational springs," personality traits, life algorithms, functions, abilities, habits, and predilections; including everything that an individual usually carefully hides from others. This knowledge fully reveals the true nature of a person (which is usually hidden behind numerous masks), giving a complete picture of who he or she is—real, "without embellishments."
In order to make contact with another person and turn it in the needed direction, it is necessary to understand exactly who your opponent is: how he/she will act, what and how he/she will say, what he/she will seek, and so on. To know all this, it is no longer necessary to meet up with this person, to observe him, to try to learn something about him from someone, to provoke some actions, to study his reactions, and so on. There is no longer a need to be in any situation with a person in order to know exactly what to expect from him (what actions, what reactions, what decisions) and what to be cautious of with him. It is enough to simply read the description of a person in the Catalog of human population.
It is possible to read any type of information about any person in Catalog of human population. It is just as easy as learning, for example, about dogs from a reference book about dogs. And, this is at a minimum because the Catalog of human population also contains information about how to make a person absolutely controllable from the outside, about how he should "grow," meaning—gradually develop, self-perfect, etc.
-What is the natural individual (subtype) program of Homo sapiens?
Individual (subtype) program of Homo sapiens is a program, based on which a person lives. He is unable to go beyond it. A program "starts up" and begins to work at the time of birth; to be more precise, at the time of cutting of the umbilical cord.
Individual program of a person is a program of one of 293 human subtypes. Therefore, we use the term "individual (subtype) program." The program of each subtype differs from programs of all other subtypes.
An individual (subtype) program is recorded in human unconscious by the language of natural images (archetypes). Archetypes are a protolanguage. Unconscious of Homo sapiens "speaks" this language and human psychophysiology "understands" only this language. One human program can contain about 20 or over 100 natural images. Individual programs of human subtypes are recorded by different quantities of images, but no subtype has any advantages over other subtypes—all have equal potential and survival rate.
Each individual (subtype) program consists of two parts "active" and "passive."
Each individual (subtype) program is described in the Catalog of human population on six factors: intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional, sexual, and environmental.
Appearance of people with various subtype programs is connected with natural phenological cycles. Therefore, it is necessary to know the day, month, and year of birth of a person in order to find his description in Shan Hai Jing.
-How an individual (subtype) program of a person is connected with his/her date of birth?
It is necessary to know the day, month and year of birth of a person in order to find his/her description in the Catalog of human population. However, we have to disappoint astrology and numerology fans, as this is not related to influence of planets and stars, or "magic of numbers." This is related to natural phenological cycles.
For those who are not familiar with the science called "phenology"—in a nutshell, it is a system of knowledge and sets of information about seasonal phenomena of nature, time periods of their occurrences and reasons that define these periods, as well as the science of space-time laws of cyclical changes of natural objects and their complexes, associated with annual movement of the Earth around the Sun. In nature, absolutely all bio-forms (plants, animals, birds, fish, insects, reptiles, etc.) appear during their time periods. Scientists have recorded this fact a long time ago. At the beginning of the last century, a German zoologist Alfred Brehm has demonstrated that each type of living organism appears on earth during a specific time period.
For example, rabbits are born in late April-early May, deer—in May-June, seals—in March, and so on. "…And the stork in the heaven knoweth the appointed times, and the turtle, and the swallow and the crane observe the time of their coming…" (Jeremiah 8:7) A human, as part of the earth’s ecosystem, as part of nature is subject to the same laws as all other natural objects; therefore, if at certain specific time periods creatures, which we call “a cow”, “an eagle” or “a hippopotamus” are born, then exactly the same rule applies to a human.
Using scientific terminology, Homo sapiens is programmed bio-form, anthropo-zoomorphic being, individual (subtype) archetypal pattern of which depends on phenological cycling of a geographical area. Appearance of subtypes of the biological type Homo sapiens is connected with natural phenological cycles, and specifically for this reason, classification of subtypes in the Catalog of human population is recorded according to the date of birth.
Andrey Davydov—the author of the discovery of the Catalog of human population in the ancient Chinese manuscript Shan Hai Jing, and the author of creation of the technology of decryption of this ancient book—put together a schedule of appearance of subtype structures of type human, and this schedule is copyrighted.
-How 293 individual subtype programs are distributed if there are 365 or 366 (leap years) days in a year?
Despite the fact that birth of a particular subtype structure is firmly connected to the date of birth, in the case of research of the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing (which turned out to be the Catalog of human population) things are not as simple as they are in astrology. At least because there are 365 days in a year (or 366 in leap year), while there are 293 subtype structures of Homo sapiens described in the Book of Mountains and Seas. However, this problem has long been solved by Andrey Davydov—the author of the scientific discovery of the Catalog.
However, many of those who learn about the Catalog are concerned about the question of how 293 individual subtype programs are distributed if there are 365 or 366 (leap years) days in a year. We uncovered that some subtype programs are reproduced a few days in a row. However, this does not mean that people born in this period are absolutely the same because manipulation modes of these individual programs are often completely different. Therefore, to put it in simple terms, these people are not like each other one hundred percent, but they do share the same subtype program—meaning, individual qualities and algorithms.
-When does a human subtype program turn on?
“Hour X,” as time of birth of a human, starts up his subtype program. The “soul” begins to work, and a human—to live. And, he will live while his soul, in other words—his subtype program as a mechanism works in his body, and works on all six factors: intellect, physiology, nutrition, emotions, sexual factor and environmental factor. If the work of one of these factors stops, then breakage of other factors will follow: fast, as in the case of, for example, physical and nutritional factors (starvation, disease), or slow, as, for example, in the case of sexual, emotional or intellectual factors.
It does not matter how a person was born, whether in a natural way or, for example, with the use of cesarean section. Individual subtype program starts working at the moment of cutting of the umbilical cord. It does not matter when a person was conceived, how long the pregnancy lasted, and so on. The only important moment is the time of detachment of his body from the body of his mother in the form of cutting of the umbilical cord because that is the moment when the individual (subtype) program begins to work.
There is a supposition (although, we have not studied this issue within interdisciplinary research) that subtype programs of Homo sapiens is the record that human DNA contains. It is very likely that every human embryo initially contains a record of all 293 subtype structures, along with manipulation modes for each one of them and a record of passage through these stages of personal (subtype) evolution of an individual, which are also programmed and are described in Shan Hai Jing. This is a huge array of information. However, at the moment of birth only one of the subtype structures is activated, and all other records remain unactivated. Once again, unlike everything else presented here, this is only a hypothesis.
-Is it necessary to know the time of birth besides the day, month and year of birth of a person in order to find his/her description in the Catalog of human population?
This information is required only when there is data that a person was born close to midnight—half an hour before midnight, or within half an hour after midnight. In this case, special technology is used to determine where the description of this person is located in the Catalog of Mountains and Seas. As for the time of birth within one 24 hour period—this factor does not matter for finding a description of a person in the Catalog of human population.
-Why is it necessary to have accurate information about the year of birth of a person?
It is very important to know the year of birth of a person in order to get information about him/her from the Catalog of human population. It is important to know the year for one reason only: to understand whether it is a leap year or a common year. Since in most cases if two people were born on the same day, but one of them was born in a common year and the other was born in a leap years, then they are representatives of different human subtypes. Therefore, they have different individual (subtype) programs and manipulations modes. In this case, they have completely different qualities, characteristics and functions, they lead different lifestyles.
Of course, coincidences do happen because the ancient treatise Shan Hai Jing contains 293 descriptions of human programs and, as it is known, there are 365 days in a year. However, in order to use this information, it is necessary to know exactly which programs are reproduced multiples times.
Therefore, without having knowledge of the exact year of birth of the person of interest—accurate information from the Catalog of human population about this person cannot be obtained. However, this is not a problem because in the modern world it is very easy to get information about when a person was born. Usually, it does not even cross a person’s mind to hide this kind of information about himself. Also, it is easy to find it in public records, profiles in social networks, documents, forms, and so on.
-What are “Active” and “Passive” of an individual (subtype) program of a person?
As it turned out, any natural program of Homo sapiens, regardless of subtype, consists of two parts. The author of this scientific discovery, researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov named these parts "Active" and "Passive."
The "Active" part of a human program is responsible for the period of a person’s activity. It is a period of real actions, but also a period of active energy and strength expenditure. Therefore, every person requires rest from time to time, and not only in the form of sleep, but also in the form of some type of activity. Not for nothing there exists a saying: "The best rest is change of activity." Human activities from the "Passive" part of his individual program do not take away strength, but rather help a person accumulate it, turn on regeneration processes in him.
Not knowing about the existence of this natural mechanism, which is built into every human, people are often frightened of that two different personalities are always present in others or in themselves all the time. The diagnosis known as "dissociative identity disorder" does not require any treatment, if we do not consider clinical cases in the field of psychiatry when, using the language of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis, a serious malfunction of the individual (subtype) program occurs.
“Active” and “Passive,” to put it very raspingly and primitively—are like two different human characters because each part of the human program is recorded by different images, which give a different character, style of actions of a person, and algorithms of his life. In practice, this manifests in the so-called duality of any person. For example: Mr. N is quiet and harmless at work, but at home he is active, loud, and despotic; a different Mr. N uses his intellect at work as an analyst, and during the time of rest chooses physical exercise and, as they say, “does not use his head at all;” some other Mr. N behaves as a leader in communication with several people, but when he is with only one other person—he completely subjects to another’s will; and so on and so forth. There are many examples, but the main thing here is that every person (a man or a woman) is “dual” by nature, double-natured. This “duality” is necessary because one cannot be passively recovering while simultaneously actively spending himself.
Existence of separation of individual (subtype) programs into "Active" and "Passive," in our view, can be explained by the fact that sometimes twins have different characters, habits, functionality, qualities of personality. Without getting into details, we will just say that according to our observations, in some cases twins can share a single subtype program; meaning that one lives according to the “Active” part of the program, and the other on the basis of the “Passive.” We do not know yet why this happens, more research needs to be done on this, but this fact is the reason twins differ in their personal qualities, characters, algorithms and so on, even though both twins belong to the same subtype.
-What are “six factors of a human?”
In the Catalog of human population, which is compiled on the basis of decryption of the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing, all information about a person consists of a general description of an individual and a description of his qualities and functioning on six factors.
Classification by six factors, which are fundamentally different from each other, is a system created by researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov to describe functioning of human subtypes during compilation of the Catalog of human population. Since at a certain point he was faced with a problem: how to structure information obtained from the ancient source about a particular subtype in descriptions of psychophysiological diapason of a subtype? Data obtained from the ancient text contained very diverse information about a human: how representatives of a particular human subtype think, data about their nutritional or environmental diapason, sexual peculiarities, and so on.
In fields that are traditionally related to a human (for example, in medicine) no systems were found, according to which to would be possible to distribute information obtained from Shan Hai Jing. It was necessary to create a classification, which would encompass human life activity in general. To solve this problem, Andrey Davydov identified six factors: intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional, sexual, and environmental.
And, as it is easy to notice, intellectual factor is only a part of human psyche, and not the most important one. Not to appear unfounded, we will provide an example. If there is certain influence on the physical factor of a human (for example, induction of a painful shock), or influence on the nutritional factor (for example, leaving a person without food or drink for a long time), or influence in a way that a person begins to experience a strong sexual arousal or a strong emotional stress—then, his intellectual factor will turn off, and he will function on the basis of instincts, reflexes, automated processes in his organism. Even a severe headache, as one of the states of the human physical factor, can partially disable the intellect, meaning that a person’s thought process will be quite unproductive. Therefore, it was concluded that the intellectual factor is only one of six factors of human psychophysiology.
-Why six factors, and not more?
Number of factors to describe primary programs could not be expanded, supplemented by some other factor. Despite a common misconception that at the first level of development Homo sapiens has so-called "spirituality"—information from the ancient text did not confirm this. The appearance of the factor of "spirituality" in humans is a separate topic.
-What is the difference between a woman’s and a man’s natural program within one subtype?
Men and women within one human subtype differ from each other in the same way as females and males within one subspecies of, for example, animals. They have identical personal characteristics, psychophysiological algorithms, lifestyle, and functionality. Some differences might be present in the sexual factor; for example, in attitudes towards offspring. In nature, females of some species of animals care for their offspring without participation of males; females make males leave their offspring; not only males, but also females of some species do not engage in caring for their offspring at all; or, for example, a male and a female of some types of birds engage in upbringing of their nestlings together and distribute parenting duties equally. However, as mentioned above, these differences are not fundamental.


-Psychophysiological state and behavior of Homo sapiens potentially is 100% manageable; the discovery of natural human manipulation modes.
In addition to detailed descriptions of 293 types of structures of human psychophysiology, Andrey Davydov (researcher-sinologist and author of scientific discovery called the Catalog of human population) found descriptions of natural human manipulation modes for each subtype of Homo sapiens in the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing. It turned out that a human is subject to operator's influence in relation to himself, as well as to external influence in mediated modes: optimum, balance, suppression, stimulation.
Each person (subtype) has three manipulation modes: suppressing, balancing, and stimulating. However, information about a person’s individual (subtype) program, i.e. "optimum mode" is also used to control him.
By nature manipulation modes are built into the unconscious of a human in order to enable him to effectively regulate his psychophysiological state and his behavior. However, as it turned out, if a person knows manipulation modes of a particular individual, and applies this knowledge from the outside, then the individual can be 100% controllable.
The power of this tool for managing a human and its effectiveness are due to that this is a purely natural mechanism. Manipulation modes were not invented, developed by anyone, including by the author of this scientific discovery. Reactions of any person to personal (subtype) manipulation modes occur at the level of unconscious reflexes and therefore no human can resist their application.
Moreover, without knowledge of your own manipulation modes it is impossible to even notice that you are being manipulated. At the same time, when a person knows his manipulation modes, for some time he still continues to react to them. And, this occurs until a certain stage (until which stage specifically is a separate topic).
Representatives of different human subtypes have different manipulation modes. Therefore, some manipulative technique works on one person, but does not work on another.
Also, using the language of science, natural manipulation modes allow to regulate all life activity of a human, but possible metamorphosis from regulation do not change his belongingness to a particular subtype structure of Homo sapiens. In other words, it is possible to make an individual feel in a certain way or carry out some actions (any actions and for as long as desired), but, figuratively speaking, a manipulator will not be able to turn a deer into a horse, a rhinoceros into a hippopotamus, a pine into a spruce, and a chamomile into a rose.
As worldwide practice has shown, without knowledge of an individual’s subtype manipulation modes from the Catalog of human population, it will never be possible to have complete control over a person with a one hundred percent guaranteed result, and our research confirmed this.
-What are suppression, balance and stimulation modes?
Each person has three manipulation modes: suppression mode, balance mode and stimulation mode. Each one of these modes has its own, specific effect on the entire human psychophysiology. These modes are different for different people (meaning, for representatives of different human subtypes).
We will describe each mode very briefly.
Suppression mode, if considered as a mode of self-regulation of a system called “a human,” it rather powerfully relaxes psyche and body of an individual, brings calmness and joy, pleasure, satisfaction, delight. When a person’s suppression mode is transmitted*, he experiences a state of euphoria stronger than the effect of any narcotics. This completely disorients a person and makes him obey the manipulator, according to the pleasure principle. Right from the start of application of this type of manipulation mode, a person begins to require "a dose" of this kind of pleasure over and over again. And, he will not be able to stop.
When the suppression mode is being transmitted, analysis of the situation and the individual who is transmitting this mode becomes impossible for the subject of manipulation. Any person is absolutely open to this kind of influence and he is defenseless before it because it goes through the unconscious, reflexive sphere, bypasses the intellect, and makes use of those mechanisms, which a person is unable to control.
A pleasant benefit from manipulation when transmitting the suppression mode of a person is that he/she not just falls in love with the manipulator, but literally begins to adore him/her. On this basis, the subject of manipulation is ready to fulfill any request of the manipulator.
The balance mode is called balance because it balances, stabilizes the entire psychophysiology of a person, who is being manipulated, and causes him to be in a harmonious, comfortable state. Balance mode makes the subject of manipulation feel not only very comfortable, but also be quite non-critical. It makes him perceive the manipulator as a friend, even though it is likely that he is not. The comfortable state, which transmittance of the natural balance mode by the manipulator causes, automatically makes a person trust the manipulator, and this trust is unconscious and is not based on absolutely anything. "Doors of the soul" open up.
The stimulation mode causes the subject of manipulation to feel such a strong irritation that a person, so to speak, not only "runs on walls," but also on the ceiling. This irritation turns a person, who is being manipulated into a real kamikaze, and he is ready to carry out any actions that the manipulator needs. Using this mode, it is possible to make any person do absolutely anything; even something that he would never do in his life, as well as something that, perhaps, will bring him irreparable harm, or something that he will regret for a long time.
It does not matter which race, nationality or gender is a person to whom manipulation modes are applied. In this sense, representatives of the entire human population are absolutely the same. By nature each person has an individual subtype program and individual modes of self-control/control of processes of life activities, and behavior in particular.
Of course, this is general introductory information. More details about manipulation modes, as well as what a person, who is being manipulated feels when these modes applied to him, and which feelings make him obey the manipulator, can be found in the book titled Human Manipulation Modes. Either You Are Manipulating Or You Are Being Manipulated (by Olga Skorbatyuk and Kate Bazilevsky). Here, we will add only that a human is unable to guess, "learn intuitively" or "draw out" natural manipulation modes. Even his/her own. This means that he will not be able to control/manage himself or another person with a predictable, stable and guaranteed result.
* The term "transmittance of a manipulation mode (manipulation modes)" means that a manipulator acts out manipulative scenarios (or images of manipulation modes) for the subject of manipulation.
-What are the principle differences between the natural tool for controlling a human, which is called Manipulation Modes and all other manipulation methods?
If someone thinks that there are people who cannot be controlled with a one hundred percent result—this only means that he knows nothing about natural manipulation modes of Homo sapiens from the Catalog of human population.
Every person is born with a built-in mechanism called "manipulation modes," which allows for correction of his psychophysiological state and behavior. It is impossible to control a person with a guaranteed result without knowledge of his manipulation modes. However, with this kind of information from the Catalog of human population, it is possible to make any person think, act, feel, live in a certain way. With the knowledge of natural manipulation modes, it is possible to make any representative (or a group) of human population perform any kind of action.
Moreover, everything that a person was motivated to, he explains to himself and others as solely his decision, a manifestation of his free will, and an absolutely voluntary action on his part. And, indeed, this is the case because motivational mechanisms get triggered on the inside. This is very different from a situation when a person is forced to do something, and he realizes that he has to do that what he was forced to do, while lacking an internal desire to do it.
This is very beneficial for a manipulator. A manipulator, who uses manipulation modes of another person, is always "in the shadow." It is impossible even to suspect that he is manipulating someone. And, even more so, it is impossible to blame him. How can you blame a person, for example, for expressing a thought or wearing a certain piece of clothing or ordering a particular dish at a restaurant? It is difficult to even imagine such a thing.
The manipulator is not just guaranteed to receive that what he seeks from the other person, but he is also completely safe from any kind of dissatisfaction, negative reactions, pretensions on part of the person whom he is manipulating.
It is impossible to hide from such influence in any way; at least because in order to manipulate a human’s soul and body by the use of his personal manipulation modes it is not necessary to communicate with him in person. It is possible to transmit manipulation modes of a person by communication via social networks, chat rooms, e-mails, telephone conversations, and even text messages. Even if an individual does not leave his home and does not meet up with anyone—this will not protect him from manipulation using his personal manipulation modes.
A lot of money, which allow one to hire bodyguards, immuring in a castle or "laying low" on board of a personal submarine will no longer protect from invasion of "the holy of holies" of a person—his psyche and body. It is now possible to do anything with physiology of any person without the use of violent methods, but exclusively through psyche.
A high social status will no longer protect either. A person at any social level is completely open to this kind of manipulation. At least because in the life of any person there is always someone with whom he/she is in contact. Without contacts any person goes mad and dies, and this is a well-known fact. However, even if we assume that a person does not allow any contacts with other people, still there are many ways to apply his personal manipulation modes to him.
Absolutely any person can now engage in manipulation of others with a guaranteed result; because now no special education or access to classified information (psychotechnologies, special scientific research, compromising materials, etc.) is required in order to do this.
Detailed information about what exactly should be done to "break open" someone else’s "soul," is provided in a very understandable form—in the form of manipulation scenarios. Even a poorly educated person is able to understand such scenario. It is enough to simply be able to read. And, it is not necessary to be a professional actor in order to act out a role from a manipulation scenario.
Therefore, it is no longer necessary to be a professional psychologist, a representative of special services, etc. in order to manipulate another person, and to do it effectively.
-What is a “manipulation scenario?”
Anyone who wishes to manipulate another person and to do it with a guaranteed result no longer needs to think about how to do it. Detailed information from the Catalog of human population about what specifically needs to be done in order to manipulate someone is available in the form of manipulation scenarios.
A scenario of any of human manipulation modes (suppression mode, balance mode or stimulation mode) specifies in detail the role that a manipulator must act out for a person, from whom he wants to get something, or whom he wants to make behave in a certain way.
Manipulation scenario is a description of the role, which a manipulator must act out.
A detailed manipulation scenario contains a general description of the role and a very detailed description on six factors: intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional, sexual and environmental.
Any one of detailed manipulation scenarios (of suppressing, balancing or stimulating mode) describes the following:
- How and what to talk about with the subject of manipulation; what topics to bring up; which values and thoughts to declare, while presenting them as your own; which areas of culture and scientific knowledge to demonstrate interest in; etc.
- How a manipulator should look when meeting with the subject of manipulation: which clothing styles, set of colors, hairstyles, accessories, make-up, perfume, etc. to use.
- How to behave if you are planning to have meals together. Meaning, what specific dishes and drinks to order at a restaurant or to cook, to cook or not to cook at home, what should the portions be like, etc.
- What specific emotional reactions to demonstrate (meaning, to act out) to a person, to whom you are transmitting his manipulation mode, and in which form to express declared emotions.
- How to behave during sexual contact with the subject of manipulation. Meaning: what types of sex and sexual positions to suggest, what sexual reactions and sexual preferences to demonstrate, while presenting them as your own, and so on. Also, you will learn what specifically to declare in regard to family, children, and parents, while presenting this attitude as your own.
- A scenario also describes in detail who to present yourself as on the social plane (profession, hobbies, financial status, etc.); how to decorate the interior of the venue where you are meeting; what gifts to give or offer; what preferences to express in terms of the geographical zone, climate, housing, interior, leisure, entertainment, etc.; what specific behavioral reactions and algorithms of relations with other people to present as your own.
And so on.
It is very easy to use such a detailed scenario; for any person. All that is necessary is to read the text and to act out a role from the scenario every time you communicate with a person, whom you want to influence. That is—not to act as you want or think you should act with the subject of manipulation, but to act strictly according to the scenario.
-Is it possible to use images, by which a person’s manipulation modes are recorded as a tool to manipulate him instead of a manipulation scenario?
When manipulating another person, instead of manipulation scenarios, as this person’s decrypted natural manipulation modes from Shan Hai Jing, it is possible to use images, by which his/her manipulation modes are recorded. This will be a bit more complicated than acting out a role according to a scenario. Since in the case of a scenario, all that a manipulator needs to do is simply read the scenario and act out a role that it describes, while images will have to be studied on one’s own.
However, it is quite possible to do if the desire to do it is present. All that you will need to do is to study encyclopedias, reference books on the topic of qualities and lifestyle of a natural object, which, as an image, is present in the manipulation mode of a person you are interested in. It is also desirable to have hieroglyphics from Shan Hai Jing (meaning, hieroglyphs, by which images are recorded) and a certain dictionary*. After studying images, it is possible to act out all found qualities and characteristics of images for a person, whom you decided to influence.
Images of manipulation modes can also be learned from the Catalog of human population. They can be used for manipulation purposes on their own or together with a manipulation scenario in order to better understand the role that needs to be acted out for a subject of manipulation.
* When working with hieroglyphics, by with which images of human programs and manipulation modes are recorded in Shan Hai Jing, it is necessary to have the Great Chinese-Russian Dictionary edited by I. M. Oshanin (or a high-quality translation of this dictionary into your native language). Use of all other dictionaries for this purpose is absolutely unacceptable.
-Can I fully control psychophysiology and behavior of a person using partial knowledge and application of his/her natural manipulation modes?
In order to make a person feel and behave in a certain way for some time, or in order to solve some local problem—it is possible to transmit just one of personal manipulation modes of that person.
As for which mode should be used—this depends on the situation. For example, if you decided to make someone fall in love with you or seduce, then the suppression mode should be used. And, if you need to, for example, quickly get rid of presence of some (unpleasant, dangerous, etc.) person, then this person’s stimulation mode should be transmitted.
However, in order to make any person one hundred percent controllable and to manipulate him/her with a one hundred percent result—it is necessary to know all four parts of his/her subtype structure: suppressing, balancing and stimulating modes, as well as his/her individual program. And, of course, it is necessary to use this knowledge on practice by acting out all four manipulation scenarios.
In other words, it is possible to influence another person without having complete information about all of his manipulation modes, but the only way to make another person submit fully and gain full control over his behavior can be compared to a car with four wheels, which you will not be able to drive in the absence of even one wheel.
-Why should I know dates of my manipulation modes?
While studying the Catalog of Mountains and Seas (Shan Hai Jing), Andrey Davydov, who discovered in it the Catalog of human population, found out that each one of the three manipulation modes of a person is an individual program of some subtype of Homo sapiens. Therefore, it turned out that people within the same subtype are not just blood relatives (blood because we suppose that blood might be related to the “software” of a human), but it is also possible to say that they have very close kinship ties with other three subtypes (meaning, carriers of suppression, balance and stimulation modes of an individual).
However, we will not go into the description of this rather complicated natural mechanism—the influence that people have on each other in time and space; we will just say that when a person knows the dates of his manipulation modes, he can find ideal partners for any type of relationship, any kind of activities and any kind of influence on his own psyche and physiology*.
*More on this can be found in the book by A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk, which is titled Ideology Of Religion: Scientific Proof Of Existence Of "God"—The Catalog Of Human Population, as, in essence, this book is not about religion, but about the Catalog. Since the Catalog of human population (despite the fact that it can become an ideal basis, foundation for any of the existing religions) originally has nothing to do and cannot have anything to do with religion because it is the source of knowledge, and knowledge and faith are completely different things.
-Why should I know manipulation modes of others, and why should I manipulate someone?
Regardless of which social class people belong to, whether they like it or not, they are connected with other people. A lion’s share of processes, in which a person participates, either way is contact with another person.
Since any individual normally lives among other people, the problem of knowledge and understanding of another person is everyone’s urgent need. However, to date there is no source (besides the Catalog of Human Souls) in civilization, from which a specific John could learn how to communicate with a specific Tom or Mary.
And, not just communicate in some way, but to do it in that exact manner that John needs; and, not just get “whatever” from this communication, but strictly that what he personally needs. In an attempt to achieve this, John uses one method after another (as usual, designed “one for all”) until all methods are tried out, and something finally works at least to some extent. However, sometimes it is too late—the relationship is ruined, the contact is broken, and goals in regard to the opponent are not achieved.
We think that the root of this problem is fundamental difference of internal characteristics of one person versus another, despite the external similarity, and sometimes even kinship. Since it is impossible to distinguish subtypes of Homo sapiens based on appearance—it is much easier to tell a rabbit from a donkey, despite the fact that both have long ears. And, that might have very unpleasant consequences. Since in nature when one tries to interact with a wild wolf as with a dog, with an eagle as with a dove, and with a venomous snake as with a worm—the consequences are always fatal.
However, it is the same with people. Not knowing the person, with whom you come in contact, it is impossible to know what to expect from him/her and how to interact. Of course, unlike it is with animals, by interacting with another person inappropriately, in the physical sense you will not get bitten, scratched or torn into pieces. (Although sometimes this happens.) However, in psychological or, for example, financial sense—biting, scratching and tearing apart is not at all uncommon among people. Unfortunately, this type of “communication” occurs very, very often. As a result, after communicating with other people, a person very often has to “lick his wounds.”
However, in this respect the situation has changed cardinally due to the scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, which was made by Andrey Davydov. Now in order to make any kind of contact it is not necessary to gather information about a person from third parties or from other sources of information, there is no longer a need to use the well-known “scientific method of trial and error,” and so on.
Any kind of contact (business, friendly, intimate, and so on) with any person is now done quite easily using other methods. In order to know what to expect, and what not to expect from a person, all that is needed is information about the individual program and manipulation modes of that person.
Application of this kind of information guarantees establishment of any type of required communicative contact and with any required results. Any interaction can easily be modeled using information about another person from the Catalog of human population. And, as a result, any person can get that what he planned, that what he wants and needs from another person.
The success of use of this technology is not affected by gender of the subject of interest, or by his/her age, educational level or professional affiliation, financial situation or belongingness to any social group. Information about another person from the Catalog of Human Souls allows anyone to have an ability to influence, make adjustments to behavior, plans, and objectives in relation to that person.
Consider any of the problems, for example, within tandems “husband-wife” (“lovers”), “parent-child” that we can safely state are common in 99.9 percent out of 100. The root cause of any one of them is the same: lack of knowledge of another person, inability to properly communicate with him, and inability to influence him. These are, so to speak, the “three pillars,” upon which in this civilization all communication between one person and another stands.
Only because of these “three pillars” parents at some point lose understanding of behavior of their children and control over their actions, and children are not able to “get through to parents,” to explain their needs, aspirations, life stance to them. Also, this is the only reason why at some stage men and women go in different directions and live separately—they are simply unable to neither find a person, with whom they would be happy, nor find a common language with a person, who for some reason they selected for family life or for other type of relationship. And so, they live apart, despite that both women and men, regardless of how old they are, do not want to be alone. They want to feel someone’s shoulder close to theirs, they want to be needed, loved, and wanted.
To us, all problems listed above seem unworthy of wasting one’s breath on, as they are easily solvable by using information from the Catalog of human population: the so-called search for “the other half,” and mutual understanding, and love between parents and children or between a husband and a wife, and how to find a common language with another person, and how to be liked, and how to influence, and so on.
So-called “ordinary people” can dream as much as they want that if he or she is not involved in something, from their point of view, serious and dangerous, they should not worry about their safety or preservation of their well-being. From our point of view, this is a very big delusion.
We live in a civilization where each one of us, figuratively speaking, lives his whole life in the area of active combat operations. Regardless of whether he knows about it or not, notices or does not notice it. It is just that the scale of these combat operations (without quotes) is different for different people: for some it is the process of conquest of economic and political influence over entire regions, and for some it is fighting over, figuratively speaking, a rusty frying pan.
It so happened that in this society that in any type of relationship between people—actions against each other cannot be classified in any other way except by the word ‘war’: in business areas, in so-called “friendship,” and even in families. And, in reality it is very difficult not to notice this fact. As a rule, it is not that people do not notice it, but they just do not want to think about it, hoping that their games of peaceful life with each other, their false assurances of friendship and love will protect them from an attack. No, they will not protect.
And, it should be noted that consequences of participation in such combat operations are just the same for a major politician as they are for an ordinary, simple citizen—pain, psychological, physical, financial and other damages, etc., up to physical destruction. War is war. Hence, the joke: “How do you feel, Joe?” – “Thank you, not well at all!” Life at war is difficult and it is even more difficult to survive. However, hiding in fantasies is not just pointless, but extremely dangerous.
The whole question is not in ambition since we faced the fact that ambitions of so-called “ordinary people” sometimes can be truly exorbitant, but in that what a person is capable of (himself, him personally); in what information he has, what he knows how to do, how he does it and does he do anything at all. Since sometimes people behave quite strangely; for example: they complain, get offended, upset, when someone reaches any success or surpasses them in their personal qualities in reality. These people are so used to being great and mighty in their fantasies that any encounter with real facts, which confirm that they are really not, make them very depressed and they feel hate towards other people. From our perspective, sometimes this reminds of a situation with a dog, which lazily wiggles its tail all day in anticipation of getting fed and petted, or sleeps, pretending that it protects the house during the breaks, and with the return of the master after a hard day of work is puzzled and upset after getting only bones off of a piece of meat.
Yes, usually no one physically destroys so-called “ordinary people” for their mistakes in communication, for misunderstanding and miscalculation of a situation, as it happens with, for example, politicians, officials, business leaders, etc. However, no one is immune to psychological destruction by another person or a group of people, which, as it is known, is followed by either physical destruction or, more commonly, physical self-destruction because psyche is primary. Usually this does not get taken into account right away, and when something happens it is usually too late to do anything about it—you, so to speak, got eaten. This society is a jungle, Ngorongoro, where predators hide behind masks of innocent white sheep.
-Why natural human manipulation modes are the only alternative to violence? And, what about manipulation ethics?
From our point of view, manipulation modes of a human were created by nature as the only way of effective, constructive, non-deforming, and secure communication.
Based on that application of natural manipulation modes in communication with any person always exceptionally favorable affects his psychophysiology (and not on the basis of the meanings of what manipulation is usually considered)—these modes were named manipulation modes. Contrary to the belief, which is popular both in psychology and in everyday life that manipulation is always a process with a negative connotation, we consider manipulation based on other meanings from dictionaries. We consider manipulation to be any purposeful action with a subject (refer to a dictionary).
From our perspective, communicative impact that leads to actualization of quite specific motivational states in a subject, and makes him behave in a certain way, should not necessarily be beneficial to the manipulator and not beneficial to the subject of manipulation.
From our point of view, this directly depends on ethical and moral qualities of a person applying manipulation modes towards another person. Just like a knife cannot be regarded only as a murder weapon. A knife as a tool can also be used for cooking, as a scalpel in the hands of a surgeon, and so forth.
Of course, being very powerful, this purely natural mechanism can be used by some to have the other person submit, in order to use him for some purposes. Indeed, when personal manipulation modes are applied to a human, he or she forms a complete willingness to do anything for the manipulator. However, we consider use of natural manipulation modes with immoral goals—inhumane, immoral, and contrary to nature.
Whether someone likes the fact that any person has a natural mechanism called “manipulation modes” or not—it exists anyway. And, the important thing is that this is how nature arranged it. Therefore, in the absence of the Catalog of human population it is, of course, possible to continue to treat Homo sapiens like an animal, while discussing humanism, goodness, morality and other things unrelated to this process. This is widely practiced in this society. Consider a method that in the case of animals is called training, and in the case of a human for some reason is referred to by different words: upbringing, re-education, etc. Zoopsychologists are very well familiar with this method as the “method of positive and negative reinforcement;” animals are trained using with method.
However, unlike subtype programs of animals, in which only instincts and primitive reflexes are recorded, human programs consist of much more than that. From our point of view, Pavlov’s (a Russian researcher, who was involved in elaboration of certain reflexes in dogs) method that has become popular worldwide should not be practically the only available method of influence on a human being in the XXI century. Influence of a human must be based on more complex principles than induction of salivation.
Our studies have shown that human manipulation modes are a subtype’s peculiar language. If a person is not spoken to in this “language,” then he practically does not hear his interlocutor, does not want to understand him, does not accept or simply rejects him. Our research of Shan Hai Jing showed a firm link between this “subtype language” and individual subtype program, meaning—human soul. Therefore, knowledge and use of natural “language of the soul,” meaning manipulation modes of a person, allows to not degrade him by treating him like an animal. And, this makes the use of violence against a person in order to motivate him to some actions or psychophysiological states unnecessary. A human does not need to be forced, it is not necessary to demand something from him—all that is necessary is to communicate with him using his "subtype language," which is the language of his natural program and manipulation modes.


What do researchers of 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) decrypt in order to obtain information about a particular person from this ancient manuscript?
As it was found by researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov, the author of the scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, any kind of information about any representatives of the biological type Homo sapiens, who lived in the past, live today, or will live in the future is encrypted in archaic images* of one of the most ancient manuscripts 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas). The researcher also found that in order to decrypt the information from this book, it is necessary to decode hieroglyphs using special technology. Andrey Davydov created the technology to decrypt images of human programs and manipulation modes from Shan Hai Jing in the early 80s of the XX century.
Some of the hieroglyphs in Shan Hai Jing (Book of Mountains and Seas) are so ancient that they are hard to find in modern dictionaries. This ancient source, which, as Andrey Davydov discovered, preserved knowledge of functioning of a human and his psyche for many thousands of years**, contains a huge number of hieroglyphs. For example, there are over fifteen thousand hieroglyphs just in the first section of the book titled the Catalog of the Mountains, which consists of five parts out of existing eighteen. And, behind each one of these hieroglyphs (of course, excluding conjunctions, prepositions, and parts of speech that do not carry semantic meanings) is some archaic image, or, using the language of psychology—an archetype.
However, when discussing archetypes, the following must be noted right away. The word ‘archetype’, introduced to psychology by C. G. Jung***, refers to so-called "archetypes of the collective unconscious," i.e., collective archetypes, while in the case of archetypes contained in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) we are discussing individual archetypes****. Archetypes in Jungian analytical psychology, along with instincts, are inborn psychical structures located in the depths of "the collective unconscious," whereas archetypes listed in the Catalog of Mountains and Seas are a peculiar matrix, an imprint*****, recorded inside an individual, in his personal, individual unconscious. And, these archetypes do not in any way relate to "the collective unconscious."
In understanding of followers of Jungian direction in psychology, specificity of archetypes as psychical contents is that they carry properties of all humanity as something whole. However, archetypes, as images of human’s natural programs and manipulation modes from the ancient book 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which is being decrypted by developers of the Catalog of human population, carry properties of only one of 293 subtypes of Homo sapiens, not of all humanity.
In conclusion, it should be noted that an archetype in that sense of the word, in which it is present in the culture of this civilization in general and in psychology in particular******, significantly differs in essence from the archetypes, by which human "software" is recorded, and by which, as researcher of 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) Andrey Davydov found, all information in psyche of Homo sapiens is recorded.
All this combined differs very significantly from the existing understanding and interpretations of the word ‘archetype’, including from Jungian analytical psychology. Therefore, despite that in both cases the word ‘archetype’ means preimage (prototype), when it comes to the language of human "software" recorded in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), we prefer to use the word ‘image’ rather than ‘archetype’ in order to avoid misinterpretation. We use the word ‘archetype’ mainly in scientific articles and in definitions of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis (a new scientific direction in psychology, which is based solely on decryption of Shan Hai Jing) in order to show that we are discussing a preimage, a prototype, as the fundamental principle of existence and functioning of Homo sapiens.
Since images in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), which turned out to be the source of detailed descriptions of psychophysiological structure and functioning of 293 subtypes of biological type Homo sapiens, are archetypes as a fundamental principle, based on which any specific individual exists—these images (archetypes) are being decrypted by the founders of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis—Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk—in order to create descriptions of subtype structures of Homo sapiens, while compiling the Catalog of human population.
* Archaic, archaistic (from the ancient Greek ἀρχαῖος – "ancient") means original, initial, from the beginning; C. G. Jung defined it as "ancient character of psychical contents and functions." It is considered that the quality of an image is archaic when the image has doubtless mythological parallels.
** Exact dating of the manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) is still not determined, but some researchers date this ancient monument XXI-XX century BC.
*** Archetype (from the Greek arche – the beginning, and typos – an image) means preimage, an original image, an idea. In analytical psychology, founded by Carl Gustav Jung, an archetype means universal inborn psychical structures that make up contents of the collective unconscious. "That what we call instincts is a physiological motivation and is perceived by the senses. However, at the same time instincts manifest themselves in fantasies and often reveal their presence only by symbolic images. I called these manifestations—archetypes." (Archetype and Symbol by C. G. Jung (Renaissance, 1991).)
**** From Carl Gustav Jung’s Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious to Individual Archetypal Patterns by A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk (HPA Press, 2014).
***** ἀρχή "the beginning" + τύπος "impact, footprint, imprint", ἀρχέτυπον — preimage, ἀρχέτυπος "initial, original."
****** For example, it is considered that archetypes are inborn conditions of intuition, i.e., those components of all experience, primeval forms of comprehension of the outside world, timeless schemes or bases, according to which thoughts and feelings of all humanity generate, and which originally include all the richness of mythological themes or collective sediment of historical past that is stored in people’s memory and makes up something common, immanently inherent to the human race and so on.
-How does the technology of obtaining information about the unconscious sphere of an individual, practiced in Non-traditional Psychoanalysis that is based on decryption of images (archetypes) from 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), differ from other psychodiagnostic methods?
Technology of decryption of archaic images, by which information in the psyche of Homo sapiens is recorded, was created by researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov (the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population) in the early 80s of the XX century.
This technology finally made it possible to obtain objective, complete and reliable information from the unconscious sphere of Homo sapiens. It is very different from all preexisting and currently used psychodiagnostic methods and technologies of penetration into the unconscious sphere of a person in results that a researcher obtains. Since results of decryption of 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) have nothing to do with manifestations of anyone's subjectivity, fantasies, assumptions. The technology of obtaining information from the unconscious sphere of Homo sapiens, which was created by A. Davydov, completely excludes any inclusion of subjective interpretations, and, in essence, is a dry translation from the language of archaic images from the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) into the language of modern psychological description of an individual.
This technology provides objective and very detailed information about any individual of interest: what are the qualities and properties of his personality, his life algorithms, functioning, abilities, desires and goals, hidden motivational springs, etc. This became possible only because archaic images listed in 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) are that foundation, cornerstone, on the basis of which Homo sapiens was created and functions.
By finding out with what images (individual archetypes) the natural program and manipulation modes of a person are recorded in the ancient source 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) and by decrypting hieroglyphics, by which these images are recorded, developers of the Catalog of human population—A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk—have a possibility to learn how any person of interest is arranged and functions.
Moreover, archaic images from this ancient source, which turned out to be the Catalog of human population, reveal not only how exactly a person will present himself to others, but also that what is behind his regular self-presentation: hidden motives, desires and objectives, about which an individual usually does not reveal anything to anyone, etc. These true motives, desires and goals are sometimes hidden by an individual even from his own self. And, more often he is not conscious of them at all.
In essence, decryption of hieroglyphs from the ancient source 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) provides access to contents of that part of human psyche, about which not only other people, but the individual himself has no idea. An individual is unable to control this kind of psychical manifestations and is unable to correct them—he simply acts on their basis, automatically. And, no Homo sapiens is able to act otherwise because these psychical manifestations, which are recorded by images in his unconscious, is "software" that is built into him from birth, which he, as a bio-robot, is unable to bypass (at least, without damaging his psychophysiology).
The true causes of his actions or psychophysiological states that are implanted specifically in archaic images (archetypes), by which his natural program and manipulation modes are recorded, an individual is unable to explain, for example, to a psychologist. And, based on external manifestations of functioning of a particular image (archetype)—it is not possible in principle to uncover and understand to what image of the program of the unconscious sphere of an individual these manifestations relate.
Probably, this is the root cause of problems of any one of psychodiagnostic methods that exist today in psychology, which do not use information from the Catalog of human population. All these problems are easily solvable with the help of decryption of hieroglyphics from the ancient source 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), which turned out to be the Catalog that describes subtypes of biological type Homo sapiens.
It is important to note that the technology of decryption of images of human’s natural programs and manipulation modes that are recorded in 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) opens up access to the unconscious sphere of any one of over 7 billion Homo sapiens living on planet Earth. Since physiological properties of a particular human subtype, which are implanted in him from birth through images (archetypes) in his unconscious, are not changed by that an individual belongs to a particular race, nationality, and do not depend on place of his birth and residence, and similar factors, which are only insignificant correctors that do not change the essence of archetypal images implanted in his psyche.
-What is the carrier of imagery information, by which all qualities, functions, abilities of a person, in short—his whole life is recorded?
As it was found by Andrey Davydov, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, psyche is the carrier (or, using computer terms—"a hard drive"), where all information about a particular representative of the biological type Homo sapiens is recorded from birth.
Of course, scientists have long supposed that psyche is the carrier of some important information about a human. In the last century C. G. Jung (a student of the founder of psychoanalysis—Sigmund Freud) stated: "Immensely ancient psychical beginning forms the basis of our mind, just as the structure of our body goes back to the general anatomical structure of mammals."* However, all those who justly considered that psyche is primary and lies at the basis of all life activity of an individual did not state that it is the space where such information about Homo sapiens as his natural subtype program and personal manipulation modes are recorded from birth. In reality, it turned out that no human child is born "a tabula rasa" ("a blank slate"), i.e., empty, without a program of life activity implanted in his psyche.
Another confirmation that the carrier of all information about a person is his psyche is a huge amount of factual material in psychiatric clinics. There are documented cases in psychiatry when it was noted that a patient showed a significant change in his behavior cases when the primary "record" was erased due to some reasons, but a person remained alive. Lack of mental functioning allowed patients to look like humans, but nothing human was observed in their behavior anymore.
If we consider psyche from the point of view of its already long-held division in psychology into the part available for conscious perception by an individual ("consciousness") and the part that is not possible to consciously realize ("unconscious"), then it is clear that human "software" in the form of natural subtype programs and manipulation modes is implanted in the unconscious. Since, as many years of research have shown, natural subtype program of an individual and his reactions to his personal natural manipulation modes take place at the level of instincts, unconditioned reflexes, and without use of special methods can be consciously realized only in part, only by a few percent.
* Archetype and Symbol by C. G. Jung (Renaissance, 1991)
-In what language is information about natural “software” of Homo sapiens recorded?
As it was found by researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov (the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population), recording of psychophysiological algorithm of Homo sapiens, on the basis of which human activity builds and happens on six factors (intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional, sexual and environmental), occurs in the psyche; this recording is made by archetypal images, and the order of recording of subtype characteristics depends on phenological cycles*.
In the mid-70s of XX century Andrey Davydov began to study the mysterious ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) and found that this book is the richest collection of archaic images. Other ancient sources, which he researched, also contain images, but the Catalog of Mountains and Seas is an undeniable leader by concentration of images per page of text, and their number exceeds all limits of imagination.
Despite that the abundance of images in any source is considered by many researchers as a primitive ancient mythological perception of the ancients about themselves and about the world, Andrey Davydov decided to look at it differently. He was not of the opinion that the ancient people were more foolish and naïve than modern, and thought that it was unlikely that they would engage in such an unserious and useless act as creation and recording images of fantastic animals, which have never existed even as myths, in a written source. After all, in order to do this, they would have to put in a lot of work and mental efforts, whereas in order to get food our ancestors had to work hard day and night under harsh conditions.
Researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov suggested that archaic images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) contain not only some very important information, but contain information about a human and his arrangement; and, first of all, about the most mysterious, the most unknown constituent of Homo sapiens—his psyche, soul. Being familiar with research of psychologists, who argue that the archaic layer of the psyche is the unconscious, where "live" archetypes as preimages (prototypes) of any kind of human behavior and state, the researcher attempted to uncover the mechanism of "input" of ancient archetypal information into the unconscious.
Since such a record contains all information about an individual, including the smallest details, according to calculations of the researcher—it must be sufficiently volumetric. Therefore, there was a peculiar kind of archiving, that is— compression of information to an acceptable volume and form. In the works of theologians, philosophers, philologists and other scholars, there were views expressed about an image as a certain formula, by which information is transmitted without change, complete, and the creation of any image—one of the highest achievements of a human, as an impress of his understanding of principles of creation of the world. However, upon receipt of an image (or images) it is necessary to decrypt it into speech, text, dance, into action, which by the volume of decrypted material exceeds the graphical volume of the image itself.
Analogous to such a process are electronic data carriers**, where the volume of information is much greater than the volume of the carrier. Since an image as a hologram (meaning—a volumetric image), carries information compendiously, multidimentionally in space and outside of time, Andrey Davydov suggested that it is an image that is most suitable for such a recording.
A child’s consciousness (soul, unconscious) records a dynamic picture of the surrounding world through mythological images, as a universal variant for understanding, and as the most capacious process of recording in mythical images, where the given element is holographically volumetric for consideration when it is necessary to turn to, as a kind of cheatsheet, and "return to himself," natural. However, if each person has the possibility to "return" to himself, it is difficult to suggest that the entire population of the Earth has the same recording, equal to a recording of one person.
Therefore, our remote ancestors or creators could be so careful that they recorded fundamentally important points, saved them in some encyclopedia, directory, catalog. So that if someone forgot something, or is simply interested to know other people’s "recordings," he would "turn the pages," refresh his memory, and satisfy his curiosity. To all appearances, such an archive could be mythological, displaying all metamorphoses of a human and nature on the whole. From this, Andrey Davydov suggested that the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) is that catalog—the catalog, in which images of all models of psyche of Homo sapiens that exist in nature are recorded***.
The process of exploration of this question took over decade, included a lot of research in various fields of scientific knowledge and experiments. In the end, Andrey Davydov’s suggestions were fully confirmed: the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) indeed turned out to be the description of structure of psyche of Homo sapiens, and strange, sometimes fantastic images from Shan Hai Jing—that language, by which all information about an individual, as a representative of one of 293 human subtypes, is recorded in his unconscious.
The ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) was qualified as the Catalog of human population on the basis that this book is a preserved ordered system that in practice allows to uncover the structure of the unconscious, where the root system of all human motivations and any other human life activity is concentrated. And, the main proof was the fact that if it is known what images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) relate to a person of interest, as a representative of a particular subtype of Homo sapiens****, and there is knowledge of how to decrypt them, then it is possible to get a very detailed description of what psychophysiological properties this individual possesses, to learn how he lives in detail and what true motives lie behind his actions, as well as how his psychophysiological state and behavior can be controlled.
* Phenology is a system of knowledge and sets of information about seasonal phenomena of nature, time periods of their occurrences and reasons that define these periods, as well as the science of space-time laws of cyclical changes of natural objects and their complexes, associated with annual movement of the Earth around the Sun. In nature, absolutely all bio-forms (plants, animals, birds, fish, insects, reptiles, etc.) appear during their time periods. Therefore, in order to find the description of a certain person in the Catalog of human population, it is necessary to know the day, month and year of his/her birth; and, this has nothing to do with neither astrology, nor numerology.
** In scientific monographs (end of XX—beginning of XXI centuries) Andrey Davydov compared this with magnetic carriers, such as a computer diskette or a laser disc.
*** In the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas) Andrey Davydov found detailed descriptions of 293 archetypal structures of human psyche, which clearly indicated that the biological type “human” is divided into subtypes, each of which has a recording in the unconscious from birth about his own, unique archetypal pattern.
**** The schedule of appearance of subtype structures of type human is copyrighted property of Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk—developers of the Catalog of human population.
-What is the role of an image for a human and his psychophysiology from the standpoint of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis, as a new direction in scientific psychology?
Fundamental research in the field of human psychophysiology that was carried out by Andrey Davydov, the author of discovery of the Catalog of human population, showed that an image is a pattern, a blueprint, based on which nature creates Homo sapiens; an image is the basis of all human life activities.
However, even in the enlightened XXI century, unfortunately, few people know that the basis, the foundation of existence and functioning of any human being is specifically an image. Modern people even managed to make up a fairytale that a human thinks with words, despite that this contradicts logic and already elucidated scientific facts; for example, prior to emergence of any word in the human brain, first there is a representation of an object, phenomenon or action—that is, an image, a picture.
First, a picture emerges in the human brain, then a short "video," and only then a person makes some actions, says some words, experiences some sensations or states. However, this process occurs at a great speed, and people do not manage to track it, but this does not change the essence. A thought, in essence is not related to words. And, it is not difficult to suggest that if Homo sapiens thought at the speed of their spoken words, then the speed of their thinking would not be any different from thinking of patients, who suffer from psychiatric illnesses.
An image is the basis of any action or state of a person. However, something else is more important here: according to discoveries made by geneticists, audiovisual "packets" of information, which cells of the human body exchange with one another, contain images*.
An image works at the cellular level. And, this means that a cell of a human organism executes orders of images unquestionably, without discussion. A human cell, figuratively speaking, is a soldier and executes the will of the image-general without contemplations, discussions, and even more so without arguing.
An image is a very powerful mechanism, it, so to speak, "gets into the holy of holies"—the human soul—and sets its own rules there. Probably it is not without reason that in the ancient treatise Tao Te Ching, the author of which is the sage Lao Tzu, an image is put ahead of everything else. When translation of this book is done correctly, it is stated there that Tao (Dao) births an image, which precedes the Primogenitor and so forth.
As Andrey Davydov found, the soul (psyche) of a human is the carrier of archetypal information, which defines the subtype structure of a human and, therefore, completely determines the work of his physiology. And, archetypes are images. In this connection, human psyche and body can be compared to characters from the famous work of Jean-Jacques Rousseau titled Pygmalion—Pygmalion and Galatea; where Pygmalion can be considered a psychophysiological algorithm and Galatea a body, which transforms depending on the creative potential of this algorithm. Pygmalion is psyche, as the carrier of the essence, and Galatea is physiology, space, as a field of action of archetypal essences.
The mythological story of Pygmalion and Galatea was mentioned for a reason. As Andrey Davydov and his colleagues found, if the image of Pygmalion is taken as a principal mechanism of influence on material, including on bio-material, then natural structure of the soul influences human physiology like the analogous mythological character. Form as a whole, as well as individual parts of a human are "conductors" of his psyche, which with time get characteristics that correspond to psychical analogues. The latter, as it was found, are a set of various forms that exist in the natural environment.
Results of many years of research done by Andrey Davydov showed that, if a myth is a psychical value**, and images are a connection of functional values that represent the entirety of a bio-form (human) and are peculiar formulas of psychophysiology of a human, then it makes sense to turn to 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), as the only classified, systematized source that is understandable at any level, including molecular. Research and experiments done by representatives of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis clearly showed*** that ancient times have left us a wonderful method for determining archetypal human programs in the form of this ancient manuscript, which turned out to be the Catalog of human population.
Of course, this is a very brief summary of what an image is. However, it is easy to notice that results of many years of research of 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which took place and is continuing by Andrey Davydov and his colleagues, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, led to a deeper and fuller understanding of what an image is than how it is presented in psychological and philosophical dictionaries**** because such definitions do not describe the true essence of an image and its true significance for a human.
* "...genetic code and genetic texts of living organisms are represented as image-semantic constructs of soliton type." P. P. Gariaev, Wave Genome, Moscow, 1994.
** "...myths are first of all psychical phenomena, which express the deep essence of the soul." C. G. Jung, Archetype and Symbol, Moscow, 1991.
*** If it is known what images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) relate to a person of interest, as a representative of a particular subtype of Homo sapiens****, and there is knowledge of how to decrypt them, then it is possible to get a very detailed description of what psychophysiological properties this individual possesses, to learn how he lives in detail and what true motives lie behind his actions, as well as how his psychophysiological state and behavior can be controlled.
**** For example: "An image is a real and ideal form of reflection of objects and phenomena of the material world in the human consciousness; an image on the sensory level of cognition-sensation, perception, notion at the level of thinking-understanding, judgments, conclusions. Material forms of realization of an image are practical actions, language, various symbolic models. By content, an image is objective to that extent, to which it adequately reflects an object." SES, Moscow, 1981, p. 920.
-What is the relation between objects of natural environment that are listed in Shan Hai Jing (such as mountains, seas, rivers, lakes, creeks, streams, rain, wind, various plants, animals, minerals, soils) and human psyche?
Natural archetypal images recorded in the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas), which was qualified as the Catalog of human population, are most directly related to human psyche—they are the language of "software" of Homo sapiens. Human psyche is like a peculiar conglomerate of natural analogues or their parts.
Andrey Davydov, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, managed to find out that from birth every person is a carrier of an individual set of archetypal images. The system of archetypal images holds quintessence of the functional diapason of nature, which provides analogues as existing bio-forms, and a human has an individual archetypal complex that is distributed according to phenological cycles and determines his subtype place.
Modern psychology has already proven that from the moment of birth until the moment of maturation—psyche of each one of us absorbs from the environment everything that might be useful in the future. Parents pass on basic information to children and, being next to them, demonstrate how to use it. However, it is impossible to affect a child's thinking with pedagogical influences, holistic thinking of a child does not get implicated in pedagogical tricks, and so something gets taken in, and something does not. On the other hand, each person after being born in a specific geographical "pot" absorbs the areal of his environment—animals, birds, reptiles, plants—genetic and psychological.
Researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov found that form as a whole, as well as individual parts of a human are peculiar "conductors," which manifest elements of his psyche. In the time parameters, it makes "conductors" acquire characteristics that correspond to psychical analogs or their segments in nature; in other words—representatives of the surrounding flora and fauna. In a sense, this is confirmed by results of studies presented by Stanislav Grof, where there are described cases of when people consciously reach states of consciousness, in which they self-identify with animals, plants, chimeras. These cases are well-known from ancient shamanic, yogic practices, as well as from modern research.
An image carries in itself elements that are identical to natural. Any natural images (such as a mountain, а river, rocks, minerals, metals, animals, plants and so on), in addition to being universal in visual understanding by people of different linguistic belonging, are also indestructible. They existed, exist and will exist as long as planet Earth exists. Therefore, the language of images will be alive while nature exists on this planet.
Uniqueness of natural images also consists in that processes, which are built into natural magnitudes, by their essence do not change over the centuries—plants, animals, rivers, lakes have the same processes now, as they had millions of years ago. As for artificial images (meaning—images, which were thought-up by people themselves)—not one of them influences and, in principle, cannot influence human psychophysiology in a way that any natural image does; and, they do not live through centuries. All artificial images are like mayflies: once there was King Kong or Tarzan, then Godzilla or Superman, and then Ironman or Shrek. Each one of such images "lives," on average, for several years or maximum a few decades, and then it is forgotten or gets driven out by new inventions of Homo sapiens.
None of the images thought-up by people live for centuries, and all the more so billions of years, as it is the case with natural images. This is exactly the reason why, possibly during creation of Homo sapiens a natural image was put into the basis of his existence and functioning.
-What is the difference between natural images and artificial images?
There are many images present around us. Images are on every corner, simply everywhere. However, all images, which in this civilization are created by people—are artificial images, whereas information in human psyche is recorded exclusively by natural images.
Natural and artificial images differ very significantly in terms of their influence on human psyche and physiology. To put it briefly, the main difference between natural and artificial images is in that natural images transmitted to a cell of a human organism give termless health, youth, life, while artificial—slowly kill.
An image, as Andrey Davydov (the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population in the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing)) found out, really is the basis of all things, as the ancient Chinese philosopher Lao Tzu made it clear in his treatise titled Tao Te Ching. And, it is quite likely that instead of “In the beginning was the Word” the early Bible stated: “In the beginning was the Image.” After all, the Bible was translated from the Greek language, and in Greek philosophy ‘eidos’ (an image, a prototype, an archetype) does not occupy the last place.
There are preserved stories about ancient priests, who, using a tool called “an image,” could manage not only any number of people, but nature itself. Modern "puppet masters" struggle to repeat this. However, without knowledge that priests had, "lords of human souls" are unable to go further than creation of most primitive artificial images.
The secret of priests is very simple. Images can be natural and artificially created. And, images, as the basis of all things, refer to natural images and not in any way to ones thought-up by people.
Also, "puppet masters" probably do not know that every single artificial image has a destructive influence on human psychophysiology, slowly kill him from the inside (and, its creators as well). Also, they probably do not know that in this civilization exists a book that is a collection of a huge number of natural images—this book is 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing).
It would seem that this book could save "lords of human souls" from failure since natural images, as opposed to artificial that they invent, give real power over a human. However, it is not so. It is not enough to find out these images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing)—it is also necessary to have information to which person (which subtype) certain images relate to in the ancient manuscript, as well as to have information about how to work with these images*. Without having all of this information in a complex, the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) becomes absolutely useless, and unsuccessful experiments lead to enormous damage of psychophysiology of experimenters.
* Tracking of transformation of natural forms into archetypal images and identification of patterns that allow uncovering of archetypal complexes that are implanted directly in the human soul are copyrighted.
-“Natural images are etalon-carriers for a human”—what does this mean? And, how are images of a human program or a manipulation mode considered through natural analogues?
During their time many inquisitive minds explored similarities and differences between humans and animals, and have not managed to find the cornerstone that allows to confidently state anything specific about this. In the end, they resorted to concepts of "soul" and "spirit," which, in their view, distinguish a human from an animal. However, for representatives of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis these conclusions seem either too premature and unconvincing or, for example, in regard to "spirit"—frankly erroneous.
Fundamental research in the field of human psychophysiology, carried out by the author of discovery of the Catalog of human population—Andrey Davydov and his colleagues, showed that an image is an ancient formula, expressed by a natural bio-form.
Natural images are etalon-carriers as examples of specific qualities present in a certain physical form. And, their functionality can be translated onto functionality of human psychophysiology.
Human psyche as a whole is like a peculiar conglomerate consisting of separate assimilated forms and has the same diapason of actions as a natural analog or a part of an analog. It would be overhastily to assign only the role of food, incidental material, etc. to animals and plants since the development of civilization has a vector directed to consideration of various bio-forms as concomitant, without their consumption by a human.
Since Andrey Davydov discovered that human psychophysiology has natural analogues, it was necessary to solve the problem of translation of these analogues onto purely human characteristics: character properties, life algorithms, and so on. This problem was successfully solved, and the evidence of this is veracity and exactness of psychological descriptions of human subtypes’ life activities, as a result of decryption of 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which are created for the Catalog of human population.
How are images considered through natural analogues? We think that this will be clearer through an example. Therefore, for example, to determine what psychophysiological qualities are inherent in a woman if one of the images of her individual program is a horse—it is necessary to study natural properties of this image. A horse (Lat. Equus) is an odd-toed ungulate animal, weighs up to 300 kilograms, it is polygamous, herbivorous, it lives on the plains, gallops with a maximum speed of 60 kilometers per hour, etc. This information is then transferred onto a person on six factors, and as a result, we find out the following:
- This woman thinks clearly and expresses her thoughts directly.
- Since horses have a strict hierarchy of females, she is a pronounced leader.
- By nature she has an athletic body, and, as a rule, it is well trained (or looks like it is, even if she does not train on purpose).
- She has a moderate layer of fat.
- She has a tendency to run, and she is not a sprinter, but a stayer.
- She is inclined to have a variety of sexual partners, but at the same time she is a very jealous person.
- Emotionally she is hot-tempered.
- She expresses her emotions openly and unashamedly.
- She is not a good homemaker at all—her home will be about as clean as a horse stall.
And so on. However, this is only an example, and we demonstrated only a very small part of what just one image of a person’s program can uncover about a human as a carrier of a certain program. Since a human is not an animal that has only one image as the basis of functioning. As already mentioned, the number of images in some human programs might exceed one hundred, and each natural image is first of all considered in terms of its natural analog.
However, it makes sense to mention that the method of analysis of each image of a human program or a manipulation mode through natural analogues is not the only method of obtaining psychological descriptions of a certain person. The main method is work with ancient hieroglyphs, by which these images are recorded in the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, Catalog of Mountains and Seas), which turned out to be the Catalog of human population. Hieroglyphics that are read using the technology of decryption, which was specially created by Andrey Davydov (the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population) gives by far more information about a program and manipulation modes of Homo sapiens than can be learned from all existing encyclopedias about nature.
However, unfortunately, amateurs are strongly discouraged from attempts to independently decrypt hieroglyphics from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), as this skill requires long-term learning and training under supervision of a specialist in the field of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis. Otherwise, attempts to decrypt hieroglyphs, by which human programs and manipulation modes are recorded in this ancient source, can lead to highly undesirable consequences, of which quite severe psychical and somatic illnesses can be regarded as the mildest.
-If developers of the Catalog of human population state that Homo sapiens is an anthropo-zoomorphic being, bio-program of which is recorded by images of animals, then what is the difference between a human and an animal?
As it was found by Andrey Davydov, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, a human is not an evolved ape, as Darwinists state; Homo sapiens is a biological type that by its natural arrangement is not in any way related to neither monkeys, nor any other kind of animal. Since the basis, on which biological type "human" appears and functions is completely different.
If we consider the structure of psyche of Homo sapiens, about which neither Darwin, nor the followers of theory of evolution known nothing, a human being is totally different from any animal. However, of course, in order to state this with confidence, it is necessary to know what human psyche is, how it is arranged and how it works; and, of course, on what basis. In short, everything that lies in the plane of value, which is unknown to anthropologists, psychologists, and so on, ​​called psyche ("soul") of a human*. On the one hand, they define psyche as a systematic property of highly organized matter that manifests in a particular reflection of objective reality by a subject**, i.e., they consider it as a system; while, on the other hand, there was not a single scientific source found that would state that human soul is a system, which is one hundred percent identifiable.
However, in general, psychologists’ approach to human soul can be considered correct—it is indeed possible to understand the construct of the soul when considering it as a system. As Sima Qian (II-I centuries BC), the creator of Chinese historical science, stated: "once classified, it can be known." Having identified six factors, of which human psyche consists, Andrey Davydov not just came closer to the soul as a system that is a carrier of information, but also one of the requirements of classification systems was observed—compilation of fundamental sections, which are principally different from each other in their characteristics and criteria.
And, what is the basis? When it comes to a Homo sapiens, the basis of his existence, as Andrey Davydov found, are archetypal programs. These programs consist of chimeric formations, while chimeras are expressed in images. The latter is systematized into a scheme, which in a new direction in scientific psychology called Non-traditional Psychoanalysis (which does not using any existing methods in psychology, and is based solely on the decryption of the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) that turned out to be the Catalog of human population) is known as "individual archetypal pattern."
The difference between a human and an animal is not in that what is commonly believed, for example, possession of the ability to think and articulate speech, work activity, creation and use of tools, alleged "spiritual needs," and so on. The only difference is in that animals are much more primitive in terms of images that are the basis of their life activities. An animal, or any other natural object, has only one image in its biological program. For example: only a monkey, only a horse, only salmon, only a pine, only an ant, only an orchid, only a stone, only gold. However, a human has a natural biological program, which is recorded by an impressive number of natural images, and this program, conditionally speaking, can contain a monkey, and a horse, and salmon, and a pine, and an orchid, and an ant, and stones, and gold, and much more, for example, rivers, lakes and seas, mountains and valleys, grasses and trees, various soils. And, this is far from all.
There are 293 unique human programs described in the ancient source 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), and one program can be recorded by over one hundred different images. It is not surprising that a human has a much greater survival rate in nature than any other natural object.
Although only in potential. Without knowledge of his natural program, a person is inferior even to animals in some psychophysiological parameters, for example, strength, agility, speed, visual acuity, etc. Even though it is all there in human potential, without knowledge it will never work. However, this does not make Homo sapiens relatives of primates.
* "Having accumulated rich experimental material, having developed unique methods of experimental study of psyche, today psychophysics reached an impasse. It lost the very subject of its application. Breaking out of the deadlock is possible in acquisition of scientific interest, namely, in defining its place in solution of the main problem of psychology (anthropology, philosophy): what is psyche." K. D. Zarochentsev, A. I. Khudyakov, First Russian Philosophical Convention: Crisis of Modern Psycho-Diagnostics, St. Petersburg, 1997, Vol. 7, p. 451.
"To state something fundamental about a modern, civilized human is one of the most difficult and thankless tasks that one can think of since the one who states, is limited by the same conditions and is blinded by the same prejudices, as those about whom he has to express his views." C. G. Jung, Soul Problems of Our Time, Moscow, 1994, pp. 158-184.
** "Psyche (from the Greek psychikos - soulful) is a systematic property of highly organized matter, manifested in a subject’s particular reflection of objective reality, and includes introjected modeling by him of this reality and regulation on the basis of created model of his behavior and activities. The study of patterns of development and functioning of psyche is the subject of psychology as a science." N. I. Konukhov, Dictionary-Reference Book of Psychology, Moscow, 1996.
-Why are there so many animals-chimeras and plants-chimeras in 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) text? How are chimeras related to a human and his psyche?
Existing attempts to give an archetype a form of a particular animal or plant seem quite simplified. Homo sapiens already proved by the fact of his survival that he has universal characteristics. This means that a human has the ability to contain characteristics of all bio-forms of nature, comprehend them and successfully survive by using them.
It would be more logical to suppose that archetypes, by which natural human programs are recorded, should be complexed, multi-functional, more universal, and not simplified to a specific archetype of a natural element, whether an animal, a plant, a mineral or some natural phenomenon such as a storm, drought, flood, dawn, etc. And, this supposition was made by Andrey Davydov, the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population.
In the 山海經 Shan Hai Jing (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) manuscript, as Andrey Davydov found, chimeric structures are widely used for recording of human "software." From this, an assumption can be made that creators of humanity got involved in connecting unconnectable things in order to make representatives of this biological type more powerful and mighty than animals, and, as a result of this—amazing creatures that are recorded in 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) came into being. Natural magnitudes turned into chimeras.
However, with all the fantasticality of described depictions of fauna and flora described in 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), they are not unique. Almost all cultures preserved zoomorphic beings and unusually existing flora. Painting, sculpture, written records, utensils, and so on—everything has traces of chimerical joining. For example, in 1880 in peatlands of Denmark there was found a vessel similar to a boiler. It dates back to I century BC. It is decorated inside and out with a multitude of amazing depictions of human-like beings and amazing animals. Also, one of the strangest animals, of Celtic origin, is a snake with а ram's head. It is impossible to attribute it neither to gods, nor to people or to anything at all. Chimeras of such kind, as if were taken from a single source and spread over all continents of the world.
As it is known, a chimera is an object that combines parts of different living beings. A well-known example of a chimera is the ancient Egyptian Sphinx.
Sphinx is portrayed differently. For example, in the ancient Egyptian art it is an animal with a body of a lion and a head of a human (less often of a falcon or a ram)—for example, the Sphinx of Hatshepsut (New Kingdom, XV century BC). In the ancient Greek mythology, it is a creature with a woman’s head, paws and body of a lion, wings of an eagle and a bull’s tail. However, in any case, it is "a composite creature"—that is, a totality of different parts of real animals. The same principle—chimerical—is observed in the case of psychical arrangement of Homo sapiens, recorded in the ancient source 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), which turned out to be the Catalog of human population. However, not only zoomorphic or anthropo-zoomorphic chimeras are found in this ancient manuscript, but also plants-chimeras, etc.
Principled approach in use of chimeras prompted researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov to think about the possibility of considering functional psychophysiological diapason of a human through chimerical images. And, as he found out, connections of parts of different animals or plants into one, these fantastic chimeras from 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), in essence, are nothing other than formulas; formulas, as the totality of qualities, properties, and functions implanted by nature in representatives of different subtypes of Homo sapiens.
These formulas are universal in perception and indestructible in time. Images-chimeras from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), the book, which turned out to be the Catalog of human population, are "formulas of the soul" for subsequent multi-functional actions of a human in ever-changing environment. And, this is the answer to the so-called "great riddle of the Sphinx."
-Do correctors that influence archetypal complexes of Homo sapiens, which are described in 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), exist?
Yes, such correctors exist; as it was found by Andrey Davydov (the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population), some of the basic correctors that influence archetypal complexes of Homo sapiens are geographical zones that represent local ecosystems. They have their own specificity in geomorphological, climatic, biological, and other aspects. Their mutual influence gives us transformation of bio-forms (animals, plants, etc.) of external order.
For example, despite that according to the Russian saying "A pig is a pig even in Africa," externally a Russian "khavron'ya"* significantly differs from an African warthog. The same applies to plants. For example, an orchid, which has a huge number of forms that depend, among other things, on the geographical zone of its "residence," but in fundamental characteristics Orchidaceae have the same distinguishing characteristics, which allow to attribute them to the same family.
Something similar can be said about Homo sapiens, who belong to a certain ethnic formation. In essence—a representative of any ethnos by his distinguishing characteristics does not go beyond human characteristics; however, in form—there is a diapason of differences, which depends on many correctors, one of which is geographical.
Why is the emphasis on geographical zone? Many ethnic groups consider certain geographical zones their historical homeland and relocation to other areas causes a feeling of nostalgia. Researcher Andrey Davydov found that this occurs in consequence of that location of residence has biological analogues, and, naturally, any deviation of these analogues in other regions leaves a person, who has changed his original place of residence, without the possibility to realize his psychophysiological diapason through unconscious comparing of his archetypal complex with natural biological analogs of his geographical homeland. An individual, a group, an ethnos is left in an informational vacuum, which significantly, for example, reduces survival rate in general and at a new region in particular.
Nationality, place of birth and residence allow adjustment of functional diapason, given by nature to a human, by comparing natural analogues of his birthplace with the individual archetypal complex.
* In Russian "khavron'ya" is a word used in common parlance, jokingly instead of the word "a pig."
-When I started learning different images of programs of people from Catalog of human population, I noticed that there are natural programs of Homo sapiens recorded by a small number of images, and in programs of some people there is a huge number of images. What advantage does a person (human subtype), whose program is recorded by a large number of images, have over a person, whose program contains a small number of images?
Subtypes of type Homo sapiens have individual archetypal patterns that vary by volume. Some human programs have, for example, thirty images, while others might contain over one hundred images. However, it is worth noting that the quantity of images, by which human programs are recorded, do not at all make one subtype superior to another subtype or subtypes.
Research that was carried out by Andrey Davydov (the author of the discovery of the Catalog of human population) and his colleagues engaged in decryption of the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), and their comparative analysis showed that by potential that was implanted in a particular subtype—all subtypes are equal.
Moreover, it is impossible to discuss competition between subtypes. It is the same as in the world of animals: a dog cannot compete with a bird or a fish, and lions are not superior to elephants. They cannot be compared because they are different. In the same way, every human subtype has their own spheres of functionality, their own diapason of abilities.
For this reason, existing ideas in civilization about superiority of one group of people over another is archaism, from the point of view that humanity is a type, in which there are 293 subtypes with different psychophysiological sets of qualities. Superiority of one person (or groups of people) over another can take place only within one human subtype, and not between those people, who belong to different subtypes.
According to information from the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which turned out to be nothing other than the Catalog of human population, people can surpass each other only by one criterion: psychophysiological qualities, psychophysiological abilities that get achieved on the basis of knowledge from the Catalog of human population, but are not in any way connected with skin color, nationality, or association with some social group.
Superiority among subtypes within human society can exist only because some use knowledge about themselves and other people from the Catalog of human population, and some do not. According to research carried out by representatives of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis—this is not the norm; in principle, competition among subtypes should not exist in human society.
-What are “artificial images?”
Firstly, probably it makes sense to remind of that Homo sapiens did not invent anything that is not rooted in natural analogues, and it is unlikely that it is even possible to do. Therefore, contrary to that Carl G. Jung considered archetypes of human unconscious to be derivatives of human imagination (fantasy), research in the field of Non-traditional Psychoanalysis showed that at the basis of functioning of Homo sapiens are more ancient archetypes—natural images that are recorded in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which later on transformed into archetypes generated by human fantasies. Human fantasies are that what is called "artificial images."
Prior to the scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population by Andrey Davydov in the XX century, without being aware by which natural images human "software" is recorded, civilization produced an incredibly huge massif of artificial images. Artificial images were created to replace natural programs of Homo sapiens in the absence of the Catalog of human population since, as it was already mentioned, without "software" a human, like the computer, is not able to function.
Every epoch, every culture created and creates its set of images: first there were Apollo or Odin, then Zorro and Batman, and then Shrek, etc. Many modifications of artificial “software” were created without coming close to even approaching the question of that each person has natural “software” given to him by nature at birth.
On the one hand, this is explainable since people had to live on some basis because they differ from animals in that their “software” does not work “automatically” (as it is the case with animals) and must be studied, comprehended, mastered. However, on the other hand, artificial “software” differs from natural just like papier-mâché or plastic apples differ from natural apples.
Civilization involved in creation of artificial images, figuratively speaking, forces people to eat plastic apples instead of real. And, it is not difficult to guess that such “diet” leads each person to imminent death. No one has ever been able to remain alive and well, while drinking gasoline instead of water and replacing all natural foods with synthetic. This “plastic diet” leads to colossally rapid wear of the entire human psychophysiology, premature aging of the organism, and, as a result, death.
However, the result is extended in time, and it is similar to the effect on a person when he takes in daily micro doses of poison. Also, due to these “apples” (artificial images), the potential implanted in a human is realized by about 5% at best.
The essence of the phenomenon called “artificial images” can be expressed differently. For example, using the computer language, it is the worse virus that infects a computer. For some time, this virus simply disrupts normal algorithms of functioning of a system, but as a result, sooner or later these violations make a computer completely unusable. Translated onto human psychophysiology, artificial images as a “virus” cause human organism to work incorrectly, not at full capacity, and make mistakes (fatal ones as well).
Practical results of such failures are a variety of misfortunes that happen to a human: failures, all sorts of problems, illnesses, and old age. Sooner or later, due to these violations, each of which breaks the system called “human psychophysiology” more and more, a human goes out of order, in other words—dies.
When it comes to computers, probably in some cases a good specialist can fix a serious problem or failure. However, in case of a human this occurs without a possibility of recovery. And, in this civilization, it is observable everywhere and can easily be noticed—people rarely live more than 90-100 years. And, this is at best, as human life is usually much shorter. Currently, doctors are not capable of overcoming the problem of death; meanwhile, physiologists state that by nature human body is designed for a youthful and healthy life of a few hundred years.
A human was created as such a powerful being in potential that human psychophysiology can work for some time even when it is infected by a similar “virus.” No animal would survive in living conditions that people make for themselves and remain alive in them for some time since at the basis of functioning of Homo sapiens nature implanted the power of natural images, and by that provided a huge strength margin to a human being as a living system.
However, a human should understand that if he is still alive, it does not at all mean that he lives correctly. Moreover, it does not mean that he or she will live forever.
-Do people die only because they live on the basis of artificial images instead of images of their natural programs?
Research of the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) and other ancient books related to it clearly points to that death is not a mandatory event for a human; even more so, at an age, in which death in civilization is considered natural order of things.
According to these sources, death is the result of a mistake or mistakes of a human, which caused a fatal damage to him, as a living machine. And, if a person stops making such frequent and fatal mistakes, he can live as long as he wants. In the 山海經 (Catalog of Mountains and Seas) manuscript such long lifespans are mentioned that it is not worth to tell modern people about them because this will sound too fantastic to them.
Perhaps the only cause of death that cannot be considered a consequence of human mistake is violent death (murder). In all other cases, people themselves are causes of their death, as well as diseases and other misfortunes that happen to them.
And, as it turned out there is only one cause that forces a human to make fatal mistakes—a “virus” called “artificial images.”
Mistakes that led to death of an organism constitute of a wide variety of actions, behavior, human decisions. It is such a wide diapason of causes and effects that it is not possible to discuss this in detail here. However, in a nutshell, people die not according to laws of nature, and certainly not by the principle “God gives, and God takes away,” but first of all, due to lack of information about themselves, about others, about the world, about nature. And, due to their deep ignorance, laziness, stupidity (and insistence on continuing to be stupid), unwillingness to work and study, lack of desire to lead a life of a human instead of that of an animal.
An individual, without being even a human in that sense, in which it is reflected in the ancient sources, imagines himself already equal to the creator, and on this basis thinks that it is no longer necessarily for him to study the world and himself, to learn, to self-perfect—he thinks that he is already great, perfect and mighty.
However, absolutely all qualities listed above are qualities, which a person gets by creating or using artificial images. There is no other reason. People, who live on the basis of artificial images become dull and useless: they do not want to know and understand anything; do not want to do things right, but only in the way that they want; they are not interested in anything, they do not want anything and do not seek anything except pleasure and doing nothing; they are too lazy to take care of themselves, their own health; they violate natural, moral and ethical laws; they engage in self-destruction, as well as in destruction of everything around them.
However, the worst thing for a human is lack of information. Since when a person does not have required information about the external and internal world, he begins to fantasize, imagine. Artificial images are fantasies (including human fantasies about themselves). And, this is the worst thing that can happen to a human since this is the reason various misfortunes happen to him.
Quite often people are so carried away by their fantasies that they simply do not want to see the surrounding reality, even when the information is literally right under their noses. A human thinks in the following way: “Even if I am mistaken, I will continue to think and do what I want, as it is comfortable and pleasant to me.” Each person certainly has every right to hold this position. However, from our point of view, this is typical suicide, and in a perverted form; a personally programmed euthanasia of oneself: “Let me die from this, but until the moment of death I will feel good, pleasant.”
Humanity can play with their toy called "artificial images" for as long as they want, but people should not forget that an image is not a toy. They must understand clearly that if they think-up monsters, then they become these monsters themselves in reality. With all the consequences, the main and the saddest of which is that they become mutants, and nature is programmed in such a way that any mutations get destroyed.
Even though people to not track and regulate this process due to their ignorance—cells of a human body do not take ignorance into account. Cells do not argue what will be better for a person, as that is not their function. They simply realize (at the physical level) that image, which a person chose for himself. This is exactly how any image works; regardless of whether a person knows about this or not. As a result, a person actually becomes those images, which he chose.
Unfortunately, all of the above is not just another horrifying fairytale of fiction. All of this has scientific evidence: artificial images, instead of natural images, used by a human as etalons of his individuality lead to the state of a mutant, and all mutations in nature get destroyed. Therefore, nature shortens lives of people, who live on the basis of artificial “software” to a minimum, and then at some point turns on the program of self-utilization in them. Nature does not need people, who transform themselves into mutants by their mad fantasies, who do not fit into the environment in a normal, natural way. Mutations—in this case, it is the only reason that people in this civilization die.
-How can awareness help a person avoid damage caused by artificial images?
It cannot since the function called "awareness" does not work in modern Homo sapiens. This is stated on the basis of that, according to ancient sources, awareness,* as a purely human function, is precisely a person's ability to monitor images, based on which he lives and functions.
However, first of all, this function in modern Homo sapiens is turned off by artificial "software," based on which they live; secondly, not knowing images of their natural "software" and artificial "software," which civilization "awarded" to them, it is simply impossible to monitor any of the images; thirdly, in order to, as the saying goes, "separate the wheat from the chaff" it is necessary to know the true functions of both kinds of images, and it can be stated with absolute certainty that even the most "advanced" subjects in this civilization simply do not know how to do this. In order to do it, it is necessary to learn how to do it. And, the "first grade" in this "school" is knowledge of images a person’s own natural program and his natural manipulation modes.
Without having knowledge neither of your own natural images and what qualities, functionality, abilities and possibilities are behind them, nor of images of artificial "software" (what they are, which invisible programs are behind each of them, how each of them influences you, etc.)—it is impossible a priori to become an individual, who lives consciously, aware.
For a person, who seeks not to be a zombie, but instead to live a life of a sensible human—that is, to have awareness, it is necessary to know that the process of monitoring of images, based on which he lives, is not done by the “all-seeing God,” but by his own organism, on the inside. This is how a human is programmed. And, this mechanism cannot be fooled or cheated. A person will have to pay the highest price for his mistakes in regard to his psyche and body, and sometimes the price is very high.
From this it likely follows that the main goal of acquisition of awareness as a quality by a human is to avoid, using the computer language, an early break down and "the blue screen of death." Since this is precisely the price for those, who prefer to live on the basis of their own fantasies. And, first of all, fantasies about themselves, about how they are arranged and how they must live.
And, nature was created so that every person could learn and study his own self through natural images of his individual program, implanted in his unconscious.
Not without reason the Bible states that god created nature for a human. Information from Shan Hai Jing confirms this.
Nature is not only an ideal environment for survival of human species by composition of air, water, etc., food base, pharmacy, a vast reservoir of a variety of natural materials, from which a person can build a house, make clothes, shoes, dishes, tools, and everything else that he needed in his life—nature also provides real living or non-living etalons of what a person must be like, how he must live. On earth it is mountains, valleys, rivers, seas, lakes, trees, grasses, a variety of plants and animals, rocks, minerals, metals, birds, fish, reptiles, insects, flowers, sand, soils, and much, much more. Above it is clouds, fogs, rains, winds, celestial bodies, stars, planets of the Solar System, and so on.
All of these are natural images. And, all that is left to a human is to find out, by which images his personal program is recorded in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing)—the source that by all appearances was intentionally left to humanity for this purpose—and to begin to study them in the environment. Due to existence of these images in the environment, a person can actually see, hear, touch, smell, and feel them. And, through this—understand how these images live, function, look, move, smell, sound, and so on.
Thus, a person receives knowledge of how he himself must live and function, what he should be to follow the co-called “Plan of the Creator,” and, most importantly, conform to himself—real, natural.
* Modern psychology considers awareness a continuous monitoring of current experiences—that is, a state, in which a subject is focused on experiencing the present moment and tries not to get distracted by events of the past or thoughts about the future. This is the ability of consciousness to introspect its own activities.
-Why do developers of the Catalog of human population—Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk—consider images the protolanguage?
Because developers of the Catalog of human population—Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk—get any kind of information about any representative of the biological type Homo sapiens precisely from images, which are hieroglyphically recorded in the ancient manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing). On this basis it was concluded that natural images are that protolanguage, which linguists have long been looking for.
As it is known, protolanguage is a language that is being reconstructed by linguists—it is the language of the earliest communities of Homo sapiens sapiens (modern humans), which had dialects already in Africa 80-160 thousands of years ago. However, if it is also known that a human being, of any race, nationality and language group thinks in images, then—is an image not the protolanguage of the existing population of Homo sapiens?
Words, in any language, are only a form of transmission of mental images. After all, a person, who is deaf since birth does not hear words of any language, but this does not mean that he lacks the process of thinking. Unconscious of a human, his physiology, as well as human cells, do not understand the words of any language.
If a cell would understand the language of words, geneticists would not have the following problem: "How to talk to a cell?" Cells understand each other, but they do not understand a human behind the apparatus for transmission of information to cells. Geneticists need a language that cells understand. However, this problem has not been solved to this day since they already know that human cells communicate with each other by images, but exactly which images need to be transmitted to cells of a specific organism—they do not know.
In conclusion, it is worth noting that the transition from hieroglyphics to phonemographic language left words without images. An image is expressed by a word, recorded by letters of an alphabet, and each person who says it—at the basis has his own, individual image that is different from the image of another person, who uses that same word. The meaning, the essence, the same diapason of understanding with replacement of hieroglyphic writing with phonemographic—by varying degrees destructurizes interpersonal relationships.
The only culture that preserved hieroglyphic writing unchanged is the culture of China. By virtue of this, the ancient Chinese manuscript 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing), which in spite of everything was also preserved unchanged in this culture, was returned to civilization as the Catalog of human population by its discoverer, researcher-sinologist Andrey Davydov and his colleagues.
-What do images from 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing) look like?
The only monument that humanity preserved in its entirety and unchanged is 山海經 (Shan Hai Jing, translated as the Catalog of Mountains and Seas)—the richest collection of natural images that exists in this civilization.
These images seem quite fantastical, and for this reason, already for many centuries, they bring readers and researchers of this ancient manuscript to an impasse. For example: "...River Shi flows out of there, flows to the northeast and flows into the sea. There is an animal that looks similar to a wolf, but with a red head and eyes like a rat. It grunts like a piglet... There is a bird, similar to a rooster, but with a white head and legs like a mouse, claws like a tiger..."
The entire Shan Hai Jing contains similar material. This book has only images of similar kind and nothing else. Shan Hai Jing consists of 18 sections, and just 5 chapters related to section 1—Catalog of the Mountains—contain 15,503 hieroglyphs. And, behind most of these hieroglyphs are objects of the surrounding nature. However, all images from Shan Hai Jing are natural images because they are images, on the basis of which psychophysiology of any representative of human population was created and functions. These are not just images—they are images of natural human programs and manipulation modes. And, from these images, it is possible to find out anything you want to know about any person.


-Could I get an example of a decryption of a human program (or a manipulation mode) from the Catalog of human population?
Informational materials titled Individual (Subtype) Human Program, Suppressing Manipulation Mode, Balancing Manipulation Mode and Stimulating Manipulation Mode have the same format.

Individual Program of People Born on <month and day> of Common Years from the Catalog of Human Population

(Description of a Woman/Female)

"Considered individual does not belong to the category of people referred to as “lone wolves” and those, who drift, so to speak, on the waves of life in a single copy (alone), feeling quite comfortable. A metaphorical definition of the state “alone on an ice floe” is not about her and not for her since this woman was created by nature as part of a tandem, a link in some social mechanism. She cannot go through life and act successfully without having a connection with someone or something, either a person or an affair—she absolutely requires a partner or partners in affairs and in private life. That is why, if she devotes herself, for example, to musical creativity, she will definitely seek to sing or play in a duet with someone. With the same determination, she also cannot live without some affair; in her case, it might be some joint project, in which she will be able to realize herself in a pair with someone. Naturally, this will be on equal and mutually beneficial terms; she is not only for partnership type of relationships in the best sense of the word, but she herself is a good ally as well. In collaboration with someone this woman will not only function properly, precisely and cohesively, but also will manifest herself as extremely fruitful, making one magnificent creative product after another. For example, being engaging in a literary activity together with someone, she will produce a series of wonderful works; for example, romance novels or scripts for television series. Moreover, all of her creative products will be very high quality because this person does not belong to the category of people, who prefer quantity over quality; on the contrary, she is a supporter of a job well done and certainly fully completed. The fact is that this woman has a valuable quality: when she begins her work on a certain product—she struggles to finish it, does not leave it halfway done. For example, being a musician or a composer, if she writes a song, and not one, but several, then she considers it necessary to finish all of them, unlike it often happens with creative people, who leave their works in the hopes of returning to them, so to speak, “when the inspiration returns.” In her case, things are different: if she began something, then she must finish it and output a quality product. It does not matter whether it is a song, a musical composition, a literary work, or something else. Her works might have varying degrees of success, they might resemble one another or be different, but it is a fact that they are fully completed, finished products. Another characteristic particularity of this woman in regard to partnerships is that once, so to speak, she clings onto someone, she remains in contact with that person only until she learns and knows how to do everything that he or she knows. Once she gains experience and knowledge of her partner, she quickly loses interest in him and at that point works in the direction of surpassing the level, knowledge and skills that he has. And, the groundwork that she obtained in the process of communication and independent work often gets used to in turn become a teacher, a mentor for someone herself; plus, to obtain a reputation of a woman, who knows everything and teaches everyone.
By nature this woman is a careerist. Therefore, even if she chooses family as the main field of her activities, anyway she will strive to make a career out of it, which in her understanding means having a significant place among couples by becoming an exemplary, model wife, who knows it all, and on this basis gives wise advices, counsel, and recommendations left and right. However, even though family is very important in this woman’s life, it is not the only field of possible applications of her strength, especially considering her desire and ability to achieve mastership in quite a wide range of fields of professional activity. Some of the tools used for success are strictness and high demands in regard to her own self, as well as others, be it partners or pupils, whom she fosters with all of her might. In this process, she is not only strict, but also fair. She is direct when expressing her demands, opinions, “pro” and “contra.” Very often this woman openly scolds not only children, but also adults and her work partners. As it seems to her, she does this to stimulate them to take actions, to produce and cultivate something, whether it concerns pulling out weeds, making a creative product or doing business. And, she does not save time and energy on this since it is extremely important for her to create a microclimate for a team in which her partners do not mope around, loose spirit, and stop working. Therefore, she is very persistent in her actions in regard to raising, so to speak, the fighting spirit of her associates and accomplices. In the process of such stimulation she might overdo it at some points and get in trouble or conflict, but this will not stop her; at least because her intent is not just to have a collaborative process, but to get certain positive results for each of the participants. After all, she thinks that all this gets done not for nothing, but in the name of polishing, cultivation of her own business skills, as well as professionalism of others. She believes that work in a pair with a good professional is always much more effective! Therefore, by forcing partners not to sit idly, but to do something, to move with the help of quite harsh stimulation at times, she might, of course, periodically blame herself for it, worry that she was not very delicate, offended someone, and so on. However, she will continue doing it this way because she thinks that professionalism requires precise and qualitative performance of duties, and that it is necessary to do everything to maintain it at a high level, as this is the main factor on the way to success. (By the way, this quality of hers might manifest most brightly in case of musical activities.)
This woman differs in that she strives for success with all her might, unlike many people, of whom it is not characteristic. As it is known, some people are satisfied by that in their dreams they have already achieved everything, while others, despite their declarations, deep down are quite satisfied with their position from the category of "neither good, nor bad," and some people simply enjoy endless and desperate failures and misfortunes. No, this is not about her, as this woman aims at achievement of exclusively positive outcomes of all of her affairs and undertakings. For her, striving for success every time, among other things, is proof of that she chose the right path in life. It is necessary to recognize that this woman is not simply one of many dreamers. By nature she really does have a good toolkit in the form of personal qualities for achievement of success. For example, one of them is her ability to sensate conjuncture. Also, it is characteristic of her to be able to subdue many of her factors (whether it is her appearance, clothing or behavior) to achievement of a set goal, to getting required results, and this is not something that every person is able to do. What is success for her? In her personal understanding success, firstly, is achievement of financial success, secondly—getting a top position, and thirdly—recognition of her, as an outstanding personality. In principle, by nature this woman has quite a high self-rating, perceives herself as almost a flawless person, but she does not shun from proving to others again and again that this is really so! And, she desires to receive a confirmation of this in the form of evidence of her uniqueness, value for society. After all, she is convinced that her joint work with someone must necessarily please as many people as possible. One of the stimuli that makes her work qualitatively is a variety of distinguishing marks (such as credentials, medals, awards, and so on), which indicate not only her indubitable merits, but also that they are highly valued in society. And, she thinks that the higher the assessment—the higher level of financial well-being she will be able to achieve.
As already mentioned, attainment of material well-being is an important goal for this woman, and this is no coincidence since she loves money, loves gold, luxury, and wants to have plenty of all of this in her life. Goal-oriented movement of this person towards success, coupled with pursuit of financial soundness, can lead to that this woman will choose a career of a financier, as this professional field attracts her. However, in any case, when it comes to choosing a career, she will try to choose one that would bring her good income. For clarification of what level of income this person defines as "good," it is necessary to inquire about the environment, from which this woman comes. It is quite clear that a person, who was brought up in the USA in the late XX century by parents with a combined annual income of 45,000 USD or by villagers, who lived on food from their garden, will form a different conception of money and a sufficient amount of money than someone, who grew up in an environment of wealthy people. For one person three hundred dollars in their pocket is already a fortune, while another person feels poor with three hundred million. It should also be noted that she will be very persistent in her pursuit of what is called "filthy lucre," and it is better not to get in her way, as she will try to get rid of the interfering subject one way or another. However, her business partners must also remember that this person considers it wrong to assign primary importance to money and relegate fame and glory to the background. Money is necessary for her together with public recognition, plus money provides her with an opportunity to achieve yet another goal, which she seeks to attain. The matter is that the considered individual loves solidity in everything, and her burning desire to possess as many financial assets as possible is also connected with the desire to achieve maximum steadiness by any means. She seeks to obtain stability in all factors: that is—she wishes to have a stable understanding of the world, sound health, psychological stability, clothing that is not just stylish and expensive, but also functional, to necessarily have steady sexual relationships, to have strong family ties, lasting friendships, a stable job and income.
When considering particularities that are characteristic of this individual, it is also necessary to take into account that in this case there is one more important factor—upbringing. Although children are not antenna-like continuations of their parents, do not inherit particularities of their personalities and algorithms of their life activities, some subtypes have the mechanism of copying of parental attitudes. And, this is so in this particular case. Therefore, in order to understand the considered individual, it is necessary to pay attention to the environment, in which she was raised and brought up (not necessarily parental, but first of all parental), as this woman will certainly bear the impress. In this case, upbringing, primary education (during teenage years as well) lay the foundation for world outlook, philosophical basis, views, recipes of life, which work, regardless of her subsequent fate. Anyway, this woman will use them. And, it is practically impossible to correct them, and even more so to change cardinally. Although in spite of attitudes that she got, it is possible to safely suppose that this woman will actively declare principles of mutual understanding, talk about the importance of people trusting each other, the importance of personal dignity and morality. Another factor that influences her life significantly is subject or subjects, with whom this woman cooperates, according to a proverb: "who keeps company with the wolf, will learn to howl." Of course, the influence of her stable partner or partners, just like education, will not cardinally change her character and will not introduce major correctives to algorithms of her life activities, but it should not be discounted. Besides, this woman has the following property: anything that comes in from outside, on all factors, she considers as food. And, it should be noted that the process of absorption does not at all occur indiscriminately. That is—incoming intellectual information, emotions, or food itself get filtered quite seriously. She seriously considers all "products" that enter her psychophysiology and will not, so to speak, swallow some filth.
Another characteristic quality of this woman is that at any age, until her death she remains a child: flighty, stubborn, disobedient. One of the manifestations of her childishness is ever living interest on the inside: "What will happen if I do it like this?" She is endlessly tormented by questions like: "What will happen if I go beyond the limits?" "And what if I drop everything and go there?" "What if I do something extraordinary?" And so on. Hence, of course, the never-stopping experiments, in which this woman acts like the famous character Buratino from the Golden Key fairy-tale (by A. N. Tolstoy), who stuck his long wooden nose everywhere. That is, this woman is endlessly curious, and, as a result, periodically pokes holes, to continue the metaphor of the wooden puppet, in canvases with a painted fireplace! And, on this basis, she gets into the most incredible adventures! On the other hand, the presence of this childish immediacy allows this woman to never stop at what she already achieved, and with the question "I wonder what is next?"—keep moving forward. Also, considered individual, like a small child, who can spend hours looking at and laying out wrappers from candies, is able to self-forgetfully arrange some people in order. Just like a girl playing with dolls: "This doll is the largest", "This one is the most beautiful", "And, this one is the most expensive," and so on. The only difference is that this grown-up girlie uses real people instead of dolls. For her, specifically people are those amusing characters that can be sorted by ranks, levels, merits. Also, like a child, she forms attachments, is naïve and quite often thinks up of something that is considered by her circle as something unexpected, as an incomprehensible novation. Although if one looks closely, it will become clear that this also is directed at a goal, at the resolution of those tasks, which she set for herself. This person is quite lively in communication: she understands jokes and can laugh, have fun together with everyone. She considers communication itself as an excellent ground to manifest all of her qualities: strictness and childishness, slyness and naivety. To her, communication is comparable to communication between children, where it is possible to sulk, get angry, be cunning, laugh, fight as much as necessary. Only this form of communication—childish—causes this woman’s true inspiration, enthusiasm, as in it she realizes her nature, her destiny. In short, she is always ready to be a big adult child around children or even people of her own age. Probably the only situation, in which her childishness might not manifest, is when it comes to her work or business. It is also possible that, as a result of her childish behavior, it might seem to surrounding people that she achieves all of her successes easily, playfully, even though it is not so.
However, no matter how talented, charming and wonderful this woman is, unfortunately, she is not insured from situations when, for example, her own children grow up and leave, forgetting about their mother. Or if things do not work out with education, career or with family. Or if she gets so absorbed by some undertaking, forgets about everyone and everything, and then suddenly wakes up in a state of complete perplexity, tormented by questions: "What was all this for?" "Who needed all this?" As a consequence of this, serious derangements of this individual’s psychophysiology can be expected.
Intellectual Factor
Considered individual loves and knows how to study, and she does it diligently. She considers studying as one more proof of that she is capable of something in this life, and uses it as a field, where it is possible to realize and demonstrate her hidden talents and abilities to everyone. She is very sedulous. Once she undertakes getting an education or some skills, this woman is capable of absorbing information from any sources—whether it is people or books—like a sponge. She takes in information wonderfully in any conditions: it does not matter if she is sitting behind a desk at an educational institution or lying on her own favorite couch surrounded by textbooks. It is worth it to learn from this woman her ability for persistent consumption of information necessary for studying. She differs in that without having an understanding of the subject matter at times, she can accumulate such huge amounts of information that as a result becomes, as the saying goes, a walking encyclopedic reference book.
She is capable of studying at several educational institutions simultaneously; or, upon graduation from one educational institution, enrolling in the next one, which has a completely different specialization, and has nothing to do with her first degree.
She is an excellent tactician, capable of acting creatively in a variety of social fields.
It would be incorrect to call this woman a talker, as with all of her love for chatter, she knows how to speak out at the right time and place, and is capable of giving wise and valuable advices, recommendations.
She is extremely swift in terms of "question-answer," meaning that she is able to think quickly in the course of a conversation and react accordingly to requests of her opponents.
She is not devoid of the ability to engage with literature. She might take interest in poetry, in writing poetry. (In general, she can have great success in composing, no matter if it is literature or music.) However, she differs in that she does not shy away from plagiarism, and does it so artfully that after giving a certain style to this or that composition, which was borrowed from someone it becomes practically impossible to determine its true author.
She will certainly have a library at home, and, of course, the number and quality of books will depend on her financial abilities and cultural level, but generally they will be carefully selected. She is especially interested in rare books.
She loves computers and everything connected to them: the Internet, electronic correspondence, and so on. Communication with people, what is called surfing the net—she does all this with great pleasure.
This woman might be interested in studying the Middle East (culture, religion, for example, Islam), as well as history as a science, and this will enable her to become quite a good historian. History, historical figures interest this woman because identification with them, virtual living of their lives work very well for creation of an image of a very erudite, knowledgeable woman. She is also interested in psychology, in terms of finding possibilities to transform her own personality; she is interested in problematics of "a self-made person" (literally, "a person who made himself")—methods, ways to achieve. This woman is from the category of strong-willed people, and tends to rely on her own willpower and cultivate a sense of purposefulness and stability of character in herself, as well as in her children and people under her charge.
The philosophy of this woman is gradual movement towards something, "step-by-step." For example, this can be used in career: year after year, step-by-step, persistent achievement of higher and higher social status, a higher level of professionalism, movement towards goals, which she set for herself.
She likes to collect autographs of famous people, but, of course, will not lose hope that one day she will be leaving her signature on objects, which admiring fans will give her.
She adheres to the time factor, calendar, and in this process does not do without an organizer. In her youth, of course, she might not be very good at it, but with age she is able to do it better and better.
She never disregards little things; more precisely, little things do not exist for her.
Physical Factor
This woman differs in that she loves sleeping (as well as just lying down on a couch) very much. Even if she is very actively engaged in something, after some time she surely will declare that she is extremely tired and needs to lie down, and once she does—she happily falls asleep. In this sense, she is not from the category of people, who believe that, as the saying goes, "a change of activity is rest"—that is, if they are tired from doing something, they immediately switch to a different activity.
She considers it her duty to always take care of herself. This comes from her internal guideline: one must not be a slob, no matter what happens. She feels psychologically comfortable only when she is in good shape. She pays great attention to her hairdo and face (besides the body). As for her hairstyle, it can be long or short, elegant or somewhat sloppy—any, but it is very probable that she will make a blonde out of herself. In case of long hair, usually she will make something twisted out of it, for example, a braid around her head. Also, special attention is paid to teeth, which, in her opinion, must be kept in ideal condition.
As for clothing, this woman will try to have products made of silk (preferably natural) in her wardrobe. A tendency can be traced in her clothing, style, and behavior: in principle, all of this might be contrary to her wishes. In other words, she wants to put on some other clothes, behave in a different way, and wear clothing of a different style, not the one that she wears. All this gets done because, from her point of view, clothing in combination with other elements of her appearance, behavior is one of the important factors of success (which she so strongly seeks) of her undertakings, and all this has to work together as a single segment towards the goal that she set. However, in principle, she can have a variety of clothes. She is not against leather of most different colors and values. She thinks that an important thing as far as clothes is that everything must be stylish, ironed, and preferably not cheap. It is possible to say that she is from the category of people, who prefer to have functional, but very high-quality and expensive things in their wardrobe. She is not a fan of cheap things from a flea market. Also, she is not against having a good, expensive fur coat in her wardrobe.
She finds it attractive to have golden color in clothes, gold trimmings. She likes pale yellow, pale green, green, grayish, and blue colors.
She is one of those people, who, even in a situation when there is a huge number of electronic devices (for example: mobile phones, computers, and so on), continues to wear a wristwatch.
She is not against a variety of precious stones, but her main and steady passion is diamonds.
Nutritional Factor
Considered woman does not suffer from a lack of appetite. And, on the one hand, she would like to fully satisfy it, while on the other hand she does not want to lose good physical shape, and this might become а kind of a stumbling block. Usually, she widely experiments with diets in order to resolve this situation. And, diets might apply not only to her, but spread to other members of her household as well.
She has abilities to be a pretty good cook. (She might even write cookbooks.) A distinctive peculiarity of food that this woman is inclined to consume is that it must be fresh and of а high quality. Also, this woman’s nutrition must be quite multifarious, varied; it is by no means consumption of food according to the principle "I ate a sandwich and I’m all set!"
Her menu must necessarily include various fish and dishes made of it. She also welcomes salted fish. She likes chips, flatbreads, products made out of corn (canned, salted, boiled corn), and corn flour. From vegetables she consumes potatoes and mushrooms; from fruits—apricots. As far as meat, she pays attention to chicken. She can seriously take a fancy for sauces, for example, of French cuisine.
She likes to indulge in tea-drinking, especially with biscuits, waffles, dry cakes. She enjoys various juices, nectars and all drinks from the category of sweet, which are presented in a great variety in the modern food industry. From alcoholic beverages, in addition to wine, she likes those, to which tonic gets added (for example, gin).
This woman is a big fan of company, especially in her youth. However, when having fun together with others, it is necessary for her to watch herself as far as alcohol consumption; otherwise, in the process of being carried away by communication, she might overestimate her strength and end up, so to speak, falling under the table.
She does not mind visiting some public food service establishments—cafes, restaurants—of course, only if the conditions in them are acceptable: everything is clean, there is quality food and good service. Although she will always grumble that everything is too expensive.
She ensures cleanliness of the kitchen: she thinks that the refrigerator, utensils, dishes should be kept in check, and everything must be cleaned, washed.
Emotional Factor
Considered woman is capable of fighting very loudly and with pleasure.
From time to time, usually in extreme situations, she is capable of demonstrating courage, bravery.
Sexual Factor
Considered woman is not capable of going through life alone, she will certainly look for a partner among people of the opposite sex. A family for her is not just desirable, but rather mandatory. And, it does not matter that before marriage this woman belongs to the category of very loveful people. Тhe level of financial wealth of a suitor will be an important factor: the higher it will be, naturally, the more attractive he will be, as a candidate for the role of a husband.
She seeks to be the mistress of the house, jealously protects her home and family members from possible encroachment from the outside. She is extremely jealous with respect to her spouse. House, family is always the place where she and only she reigns and rules. After getting married, she is capable of completely immersing herself into everyday problems. It might happen that in this situation, for some time, nothing else will interest and worry her. Especially since there are usually enough worries with a family: a house should be built, space in the house should be organized, then she must have children, and then everything that today's civilization offers—to ensure that they are not in need of anything—must be provided to her children, as well as to her husband and parents. There should be a normal living situation, enough food and normal education for her children. And, it all must be at the highest level! The tool to provide a favorable environment for her family and children, as well as simply entertainment, which she will arrange for herself from time to time, will be periodic attacks on her own husband, when he will be literally provoked to a state of white rage, and then pressed by yet another claim, for example: "I want a car (a country-house, a new set of furniture, grass in the yard, etc.), and you go on, provide!"
If health allows, then she will seek to have quite a large number of children, not just one or even two. Unlike many other mothers, she wants to necessarily breastfeed her children for as long as possible.
She has an extremely caring attitude towards her parents. Even at a mature age this woman will behave with them like a child, will seek their advice, and so on.
Environmental Factor
As far as her other peculiarities, on the one hand, this woman is very lazy, and on the other hand—amazingly active. When summing up these two qualities, which seemingly do not fit together very well, it turns out that this individual is ready to actively do something without running off to somewhere, but rather stays in one place, functions stationarily. For example, it can be writer's work, writing of articles, reports or work with a computer—that is, an activity that can be done quite actively, while staying behind her desk at home. Or, for example, it can be a fancy for cooking, when she, a mother of a large family, stands by the stove day and night, and at the level of a good, professional cook provides quality food for her family. Her lazy lying around on her side can be followed by a very active way of life (which, by the way, helps maintain good physical form that she aspires to have). When she is lying down, she might resemble an exhausted living corpse, but once she gets enough rest she immediately turns into a lively person.
This woman could engage in politics and succeed in this professional field since she has certain talents that are necessary for political activities. However, in order to engage in this kind of activity, she also needs a team, for example, it can be some political party. Only this party must be quite persistent, ambitious in terms of its aspiration to do something outstanding in the political arena.
Also, she is interested in jurisprudence.
This woman can make a career not only in politics, but also in arts: in writer’s work, music and so on. She has pretty good musical abilities and is capable of manifesting herself (including professionally) in this sphere. If she becomes a vocalist and performs on stage, then she will strive to have her own style in order to be recognizable. In general, a stage, as a place where she can shine, is very attractive to her. A situation, in which she attracts attention of a huge number of people by her performance (act, speech, music, and so on), not only does not embarrass this woman, on the contrary—it is very appealing! By nature this woman has a genius for acting, and so she can become quite a good actress in a variety of genres; it is possible that her activities will be connected with children's theaters, films for children, children's roles. She also might do sculpture of small forms, made out of the most varied materials. Or she might engage in painting, textile painting, etc.
Another sphere, in which she can self-realize successfully, is public education. Admissions committees, committees for identifying talents of the younger generation, selection of suitable students for a particular educational establishment—this is the field of activity, in which she can manifest herself very successfully. By nature she is a good teacher, and upbringing, mentoring can enthrall her so much that she will become a mother at a female monastery and devote her life to upbringing of novitiates. However, most likely, she will choose namely children's institutions, organizations, where she will be able to engage in nurturing: from a nanny at a kindergarten or a school psychologist to an owner of a private school that specializes in history, for example, where young talents are educated and brought up under her guidance. It might also be a sports school. There is a peculiarity: being already a woman of age and engaged with the younger generation, she will consider her engagements as quite a serious capital investment. Since, she thinks it is quite possible that strong professionals, business partners can result in the process of good education. In addition, it is also a certain social circle. That is, this woman considers children, pupils as those, with whom, after they grow up, it will be possible to make a common business, including career and money.
As already mentioned, banking, credit and financial sphere, for example, credit bank, finance department attract her.
Also, she is interested in participation in jewelry or fur business, practically in any capacity: from a simple saleswoman to the owner of large production and commerce enterprises.
She has good abilities to engage in tailoring, as well as design of clothes.
By the will of fate she might get into medicine, and become, for example, a nurse, who gives injections or an operating surgeon. However, most successfully she could specialize in pediatrics.
This woman tries to grow something, no matter what it is (a child, a flower on her window or radishes in her backyard), or bring something back to life, or protect, save from troubles and misfortunes. For example, as a medic, she would strive to restore the health of her patients by all means. With exactly the same success, she can work in the system of psychological rehabilitation. She can work in organizations involved in saving someone or something, for example, undernourished people, orphans, victims from a region of combat operations, animals, birds, children, people from developing countries, and so on.
She can be a wonderful helper, administrative assistant. And, the higher the position and the smarter the person in charge, the better she will work with her boss and her natural talents of an irreplaceable employee will unfold more fully: delicate, polite, festive on appropriate occasions, quick in making decisions and in execution, and she will do everything on time and according to a situation.
She can work in typography.
She can become a good restaurant or cafe manager.
She is able to prove herself as a chess or checkers player.
In the event that she manages to create a good financial condition for herself, she might very well be satisfied by living on percentages from her capitals and lead a life of a rentier.
In the absence of a sufficient level of education or if she was born and lives in some remote province, she might work at some factory: metal rolling, metalwork, metal welding.
As for leisure time of this individual, she is not against going for a walk during the winter, gamboling in the snow—the most important thing is that this happens in a company, together with someone. One of her favorite seasons of the year is the so-called golden autumn, and in connection with this she might choose the "velvet" season to take a vacation (holiday). The above-mentioned love for resting on her favorite couch, napping, etc. can turn her vacation into lazy lounging; on the other hand, she is not against traveling, but it is most important that it will be possible to get in a horizontal position. To take a stroll along the esplanade, to visit the lakes and go for a boat ride (or on other devices, such as a catamaran) or to sit in a cafe by the lake—these are also good resting options for this woman.
Switzerland, as a country of lakes, would suit her quite well as far as vacationing, as well as living; any geographical zone of similar kind (for example, Germany, Republic of Karelia, Baltic states and so on) are suitable for her. It would be desirable to have a house by the lake, but if fate decreed otherwise, then it is possible to compensate, make up for the absence of natural lakes on the territory of residence by organizing artificial reservoirs, for example, a pond on her property or a pool in the backyard. She thinks that it is desirable to live in the countryside, surrounded by nature.
As far as this woman’s home, to the extent of financial abilities, it must have a stylish interior. The decor of her house must be exquisite, luxurious, so that prosperity would be felt at first glance. She strives for her house to be a full cup, so that it would never be a shame to invite guests over, to accommodate, feed, and provide drinks to them at the highest level. She wants to have not just a rich, but a very rich house, and the higher the level of her wealth, the richer her place of residence will be. If she has money, then she will not save on this. For example, she is not against presence of gold or gold-plated things in her home. She likes gilded frames on mirrors or, if style allows, she might add a gold trimming wherever possible. She likes bronze. At home, she might keep the cage with a bird and/or have an aquarium with fish. In addition to a large number of clocks of different shapes, this woman has a huge number of mirrors and photographs, as well as other imprints of her personality, for example, videos, in which not only she herself, but her acquaintances, friends, family are present. (In general, if her image will be shown off wherever possible, for example, on billboards, in magazines, on books, her music CDs—this will be very appealing to her.) It should also be noted that the expression "my home is my castle" are not just words for this woman. Rather, it is a guide for realization, a call to actions, directed at making her home a natural outpost, inaccessible for any encroachment from the outside. This refers to protection of the house and the property, which will be done by the use of all available technical means. Her house has another peculiarity: being a big fan of any kind of electrical appliances, fixtures, from an electric knife to electric piano, she will electrify her entire house.
She thinks that her own car is a required element of the household. And, it is desirable that her car would not only serve as a means of transportation, but also would be a confirmation of her high social status; therefore, it must be maximally luxurious, expensive and, among other things, serve as a business card of its owner and present her as a wealthy woman. (In general, this woman loves to, as the saying goes, throw dust in eyes.)
This individual is amazingly flexible in her actions, capable of adapting to other people, as well as fitting into a situation. Usually, she does this according to some specific scenario, plan.
This woman is a fan of collectives, but those that are somewhat isolated. This is not seclusion, but rather similar to a school class, a course at a university or a law firm, as a social space formed by a group of people based on common undertakings, interests. It could also be a certain circle of acquaintances. And, this woman tries not to go outside this circle; rather she can participate in various "circles" of different social strata.
Nothing royal is alien to this woman: she carries herself, communicates very aristocratically, as if she really is a blue-blooded individual regardless of her origin. As a matter of course, she demonstrates herself as a woman of style, carries herself with dignity, despite her childishness. More precisely, she behaves like a little princess—a girl, but with a crown on her head.
She loves friendships and knows how to be friends, but she is quite demanding towards her friends: she expects them to have those views, and that level of culture and professionalism, which she has herself. She thinks that it is even better if there would be something to learn from her friends. In case of absence of all this, any friendship will come to an end very soon.
This woman has a habit (although she does it infrequently) to return to the past, her own or someone else's, to history; at least in order to see how the thread from the current time can be stretched into the past. Sometimes such excursus allow her to find in long gone days, events, something interesting that can be used at the present moment, as well as in the future.
It is better not to become this woman’s sworn enemy because she remembers offences for a long time and always dreams of revenge.
She likes to give gifts to other people, but also she is not against receiving them. Out of all holidays she especially loves the New Year, when there is a carnival, and everything and everyone around are covered with starlets, glitter, tinsel.
She can be extremely flattering.
She has a habit of making promises, swearing, but then she breaks her promises quite calmly..."
-What are “leap years” and “common years”?
In short, a common year has exactly 365 days; a leap year contains one additional day.
Here is the complete list of leap years for 20th and 21st centuries: 1904, 1908, 1912, 1916, 1920, 1924, 1928, 1932, 1936, 1940, 1944, 1948, 1952, 1956, 1960, 1964, 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024, 2028, 2032, 2036, 2040, 2044, 2048, 2052, 2056, 2060, 2064. 2068, 2072, 2076, 2080, 2084, 2088, 2092, 2096.
More detailed information about this can be found on the internet.
-I would like to learn about myself from the Catalog of human population. What material would you advise to order first?
Ideally (of course, if decryptions (descriptions) of your structure are ready and available*), it is best to begin studying yourself with decryption of your suppressing mode (Suppressing Manipulation Mode) and images of this mode (Images of Suppressing Manipulation Mode) from Shan Hai Jing. Why not with your individual natural program? Because people, who do not know about their natural "software" tend to mostly identify themselves with the personality from their suppressing mode.
The personality from personal suppressing mode is so attractive for him/her that an individual tries to become that person with all his/her might. After all, it is possible to say that the natural suppression mode is the dream mode, the mode of incredible pleasure, which easily wins over the state of being "high" from any drug. It is not surprising that not knowing that each person has his/her own natural program from birth and that it cardinally differs from the program of his/her suppressing mode, people try to conform to a man/woman of their dreams: to look like he/she, to behave, eat, walk, talk, have sex like he/she does—meaning, to live. However, they try to live completely not their own life, and conform to that what is impossible to conform to in principle.
Hence, people experience a huge number of disappointments, "broken dreams," and, in the end, "broken fates" since a person tries to live not his/her own life, but someone else’s. Someone else’s because any of human manipulation modes, including suppression mode, is someone's individual program. And, since a human is a bio-robot with an already built-in program—he is unable to function like a representative of another subtype functions. It is the same as if a horse would want to fly like a bird or swim like a fish. Besides, it is very harmful.
Thus, when a person learns his/her suppression mode first, he/she not only "recognizes himself/herself in it," but what is also important—finds out how it is possible to make him/her become absolutely disoriented, controllable, make submit to someone, seduce, etc. Moreover, he/she learns this in detail. From a decryption of the suppressing mode a person finds out which people he/she obeys and with which people he/she falls in love. Of course, this will allow him/her to stop being manipulating from the outside.
After learning his/her suppressing mode, it is suggested that a person then learns his/her individual natural program. (It is advised to do this by purchasing 2 materials at the same time: a decryption (Individual (Subtype) Human Program) and images (Images of Individual (Subtype) Program) from Shan Hai Jing.) With this decryption (images) a person gets information about what he/she is like; and, not in his/her fantasies or dreams about himself/herself, but in reality.
This information is perceived by a person more easily because if a person finds out his individual program without having knowledge of his suppressing mode—he/she experiences unconscious rejection of this information, as he/she considers himself/herself a completely different person (namely, a personality from his/her suppressing mode).
Ideally, after a person receives decryptions and images of his suppressing mode and individual program, it is advised to order a decryption and images of his/her stimulating mode (Stimulating Manipulation Mode and Images of Stimulating Manipulation Mode). Since this mode makes a person enter what is called а "negative" state and irritates him/her so much, literally drives up the wall that not having knowledge of this mode can have a very bad impact on health (psychical and physical).
Finally (again, ideally, because decryptions are not always ready and available), it is recommended that a person orders information about his balance mode—meaning, a decryption of this mode and images (Balancing Manipulation Mode and Images of Balancing Manipulation Mode) from Shan Hai Jing.
Why is this course of action recommended? As over 20 years of practice of providing information from the Catalog of human population to people has shown—this is the optimal way for perception by a client, as well as for practical use.
With reception of a description of his/her suppressing mode a person gets a huge "dose" of pleasure (although at the same time, he/she often gets a little upset due to realization of how easily he/she can be manipulated; and usually he/she already came across this many times in life). Then, there are а description (decryption) and images of the individual program, and a person learns what he is like—real, without embellishments and fantasies about himself/herself. Next is information about the stimulating mode, which encourages and causes indignation at the same time.
As a result, with finding out information about himself/herself from the Catalog of human population every person gets a variety of sensations. And, once a person gets a description and/or images of his/her balance mode, he/she receives not only information about which qualities of personality he/she seeks, but also a purely emotional sensation of comfort, calmness and harmony.
In addition, this "informational-emotional massage" always makes a very positive impact on the entire psychophysiology of a client. (And, after getting all information about himself/herself, he/she will be able to do such "massage" absolutely independently whenever and as much as he/she wants; he/she will no longer have to search for sensations anywhere or with anyone.)
However, we do not insist on the implementation of specifically this scheme of reception of information about a person from the Catalog of human population. Every person has the right to decide in which order and what materials to purchase.
* If a particular decryption is not available from the Laboratory, which is involved in decryption of Shan Hai Jing (which is the Catalog of human population, and from which any information about people comes from), then it is recommend to inquire whether an express-decryption is available or to purchase images, by which a program or a manipulation mode of a person of interest is recorded.
-How can I bring a person closer to me using the Catalog of human population?
In order to, as you put it, bring a person closer, you need to have a description and/or images of at least one of the elements of his/her natural subtype structure: individual (subtype) human program, suppressing manipulation mode, balancing manipulation mode and stimulating manipulation mode. However, in this case, all are suitable except stimulating mode since without having knowledge of how to professionally use natural manipulation modes from the Catalog of human population, it is better not to take a risk by transmitting stimulation mode to a person you are interested in. It is much more effective to act out a role to a person you are manipulating from his suppressing mode, individual program or balancing mode.
You can read about how these modes differ from each other and the difference between the effects that they have on a person who is being manipulated here. You identified the objective in relation to a person you are interested in very vaguely, not concretely—"bring a person closer." You did not state what it is you want to achieve by this "closeness." For example, if it is a man, do you want to seduce him, or to marry him, or to get material and other benefits through him? Etc. If it is a woman, what specifically do you want from her? This is not curiosity—it is just that it is very important to correctly state the objective in relation to an individual of interest in order to correctly identify, which manipulation mode of this person you should order if you are unable order all information about him/her at the same time.
For example, if you need this person to submit to you, or to make it so that he/she falls in love with you (and to seduce), then it makes sense to order the decryption of suppressing mode, or, if the decryption is not available, images of this mode. However, ideally, a decryption and images should be ordered at the same time. And then, of course, it is necessary to act out this scenario (or images) as role to the person you are manipulating.
If you want the person you are manipulating to begin to consider you as his/her best friend and trust you without limits, to feel comfortable around you, then you should order a decryption of the balancing mode or images, or images together with a decryption and act this out to the person you are manipulating.
And, if you want the person you are interested in to feel that you are his/her "second half," to see a true "soul mate" in you, then should order a decryption of an individual (subtype) program of that person. And then, act out this scenario (or images) every time you are communicating with him/her.
As for the stimulating mode—it is also possible to draw the attention (and even very strongly) of the person you are interested in by applying it. Moreover, it is possible to apply it in such a way that this person will feel the urge to be your guardian, which is required in order to reach some objective and achieve certain goals. However, it is not recommended for beginners in use of the Catalog of human population to proceed in this way. Since transmission of the stimulating mode in the direction of a person makes him/her feel such strong discontent and irritation that this could end deplorably for an inexperienced manipulator.
However, at the same the manipulator should not forget that nature created it so that the human psyche consists of 4 parts—an individual program and 3 manipulation modes. Figuratively speaking, it is like a car with 4 wheels. Of course, in contrast to trying to move forward in a car with one wheel, when a person knows and applies only 1 of 4 natural modes—anyway he/she will "move forward" and will achieve some results. However, when a manipulator uses only 1 of 4 modes of the person he/she is manipulating—he/she will never be able to have that level of influence and those benefits, which he/she could have if he/she had decryptions (and, what is also important, images) of the individual program and all 3 manipulation modes of the person he/she is manipulating. And, it is necessary to be aware of this right from the start.
-If I order a decryption as a description of my individual program from the Catalog of human population, will I find out from this decryption what profession I should choose, in what professional field I can have a career?
Yes, of course. Since in addition to a general description of a person, as well as descriptions of intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional and sexual factors, each decryption of an individual (subtype) program of a person contains a description of the factor of his/her environment. This section of a decryption of an individual human program lists various professional activities, which that person can engage in very successfully. Types of activities are presented in a fairly wide diapason.
A person can function very well by engaging in activities that are described since by nature he/she has all necessary abilities (talents), and therefore, if he/she wants to, can attain a high level of professionalism in them. This is always a good base to begin to get a high income, honor and respect, career growth from engagement in these activities.
-Is it possible to find my “second half” after I purchase dates of my manipulation modes?
Yes, of course, and very easily. Once you find out dates of manipulation modes (among which people, who by nature are your "other half" will be marked) all that you will have to do is find these people in the environment—for example, through the Internet. And then, from them choose those people, who you think have an attractive appearance, and are of age, education level, social and financial status, etc., which you want this person to have.
If you have a description of this person (or his/her images), then you will not have any problem meeting and communicating with any one of them; and, especially if you also have manipulation modes of that person.
-I really need information about the program and manipulation modes of a particular person. I inquired and was told that decryptions that I need are not yet available from the Lab. How and when could I get the information I need? And, how long will it take to prepare my order, if I prepay for all materials that I require from the Catalog of human population?
The Laboratory works on decryptions of Shan Hai Jing on a strict schedule. This schedule is compiled for a few years ahead, and each order is prepaid. If you inquired about a particular date of birth and you received a response that decryptions are not available without mentions of even the approximate date of when they will become available for purchasing—then, this means that decryptions of this Homo sapiens subtype structure are not scheduled in the next couple of years.
Of course, sometimes exceptions can be made for clients and the Laboratory provides some information about people some clients are interested in outside of scope of the schedule. However, first of all, it is never a complete decryption, but only a short express-analysis (a couple of pages on average). Secondly, the Laboratory does not do this for everyone and money does not play a role here. Thirdly, the price of such orders starts at 30,000.00 USD minimum. Fourthly, the Laboratory considers such requests, which interfere with their schedule and queue, only from those people, who already purchased information from the Catalog and know what kind of product this is.
That is, you must at least already be a client in order to submit such request to the Laboratory. If after you receive your first order, you would like to get at least an express-analysis of an individual, decryptions about whom are not yet available, then after your prepayment is received you will have to wait for your order approximately one month.
-Decryptions about certain people, which developers of the Catalog of human population have not done yet, are needed. If they could accommodate this request and make these decryptions, they could attract attention of quite powerful people from influential and respected organizations in Germany…
Unfortunately, this is impossible. Many people inquire about this, and due to this the reason is stated in our FAQ here.
“The developers of the Catalog have to change their mind set and be more open to cooperation and in terms of access to materials from the Catalog…” First of all, developers of the Catalog do not need anyone's advices.
Most likely, you have not yet fully understood what you came across in the face of the Catalog of human population and its researchers. Perhaps, you have not thought about the fact that there is a huge number of people from the category “powerful people from influential and respected organizations.” And, not just in Germany—in any country in the world. And, that the author of the scientific discovery of the Catalog Andrey Davydov, Olga Skorbatyuk and their colleagues are the only people in the world, who know how to work with Shan Hai Jing and know how to get information about any Homo sapiens representative from this ancient source.
Developers of the Catalog are engaged in that what any one of the "powerful people" is incapable of doing—compilation of the Catalog of human population; which, by the way, among others, also describes “powerful people from influential and respected organizations.” After all, whoever a person is—a janitor, or a president—he/she is created by nature as a bio-robot and his/her natural program is described in Shan Hai Jing.
With this in mind, do you seriously think that developers of the Catalog will put what they are doing on hold for anyone? Or do you think that it is possible to impress the developers of the Catalog by some titles and "medals" after the story involving politicians and security services of Russian Federation that happened to them? And, that they will get so impressed that they will drop everything and deal with other people's affairs?
-I read on your website that I can submit a request to study at the Human Population Academy. I would like to learn how to decrypt images from Shan Hai Jing. Do you accept such requests? What are the requirements and how much does it cost?
As it is stated on our website, admission of new students is temporarily closed, but your request will be accepted and you will be notified as soon as we reopen admission to new students.
To ensure that your request gets accepted, it is required that you have all information available from the Laboratory about your personal subtype structure—meaning, decryptions (descriptions) and images of:
1. Your individual program
2. Your suppressing mode
3. Your balancing mode
4. Your stimulating mode
Information about other people from the Catalog of human population that you ordered and received does not get taken into account. It is necessary that you have all information about yourself personally.
Price of tuition depends on many factors. One of them is knowledge and skills that a person wants to gain. As for the objective that you want to achieve— only developers of the Catalog (Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk) personally do this type of training. The price of this type of training starts at $150,000.00 per year, and it takes much longer than a couple of years. Also, the selection process of students, who wish to get this type of training, is very strict.
-What would be the advantage if I purchase images from Shan Hai Jing instead of a decryption?
In your case, there will be no advantage because you are not a specialist in decrypting the ancient Chinese manuscript Shan Hai Jing, which turned out to be the Catalog of human population.
Of course, no one is forbidding you and cannot forbid you to order images of anyone's program (or a manipulation mode), as it is your business and your own decision. However, if you are asking for an advice on how it would be best to proceed and what to choose first, then the answer is unambiguous: if a decryption is available, then it is best to start with that, and then (or in parallel with it) purchase images, from which this decryption was made.
-Could I get an example of images of a human program (or a manipulation mode) from Shan Hai Jing (Catalog of human population)?
Each human program/manipulation mode consists of 2 parts: “active” and “passive.” The “active” part of a program/manipulation mode describes an active, energetic mode of functioning of a person, and “passive” describes the mode of accumulation of strength, energy (including rest mode). Materials titled Images of Individual (Subtype) Program, Images of Suppressing Manipulation Mode, Images of Balancing Manipulation Mode and Images of Stimulating Manipulation Mode have the same format.

Images of Individual (Subtype) Program of People Born on <month and day> of Common Years

Active of the Program
“…Another 350 li to the west, there is a mountain called Nephrite, there lives (at this place) the Mother of the West (Hsi Wang-mu). There, Hsi Wang-mu’s body resembles a human, has a tail of a snow leopard, fangs of a tiger, but growls happily, has disheveled hair, takes care of prosperity, from there manages five celestial torments, justly executing and torturing. There are animals with bodies that resemble a dog, but with patterns of a snow leopard, with bull-like horns, called—frenetic. Emits a sound like a barking dog—live according to this example and then there will be big sacrifices for prevention of unhappiness in that state. There are birds with bodies like that of a long-tailed pheasant, but red, called skinny due to finding application of self, eats fish, makes sounds similar to copying ones—live according to this example and then there will be a great flood in the state…”
Passive of the Program
“…Another 380 li to the south, there is a mountain called the Mountain of a young woman (huntress) who shoots a bow; there are no grasses, trees; there is a lot of water…”
* In this example, images are provided in two languages: English and Chinese.
-I looked at images from Shan Hai Jing and I absolutely do not understand how can developers of the Catalog of human population obtain information about people from such text?
In this case, the quality of your intellect and how well educated you are—absolutely do not matter. How many years did you spend getting an education in those areas, in which you are now a professional? Probably it was not a few days, weeks, months, and possibly not just a couple of years? Then why are you surprised that you do not have the knowledge and skills that developers of the Catalog acquired for decades (this research began in 1975)?
-I’m interested to know in what language do scientists of the Laboratory, who decrypt the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing, study this book?
In the process of making descriptions of human subtype structures, developers of the Catalog of human population (Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk) do not work with any language other than Chinese, as it is the language of the original Shan Hai Jing. They decrypt Shan Hai Jing by working only with Chinese hieroglyphics. Moreover, they work with a certain original Book of Mountains and Seas because this book is published in different types. Also, a special kind of dictionary is required for making decryptions—any dictionary is not suitable for this.
-I want to find out images of my individual program from the Catalog of human population, but one of my friends told me that I will get images without hieroglyphs, even though in the past hieroglyphics were provided. Is this true?
In the past, we provided images with hieroglyphics to our clients. However, we stopped providing hieroglyphics (meaning, images in Chinese language) because we do not want to be responsible for consequences when people without special knowledge and training try to decrypt Shan Hai Jing, and that causes great harm to their own (and other people’s) psychophysiology.
Please keep this in mind. When you order a material titled Images (whether of individual programs or human manipulation modes) from the Catalog, you will get them in only one language—your native language.
-I came across offers to purchase information about people from the Catalog of human population on the Internet a few times, but I heard that these sites belong to fraudsters. Is this really the case?
Purchasing information from the Catalog through our website or contacting us are the only ways to get information from the Catalog of human population directly from its developer without the risk of coming across fraudsters.
Unfortunately, there is such danger. Some research works of Andrey Davydov (the author of discovery of the Catalog of human population) and the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog Of Human Souls led by him were stolen by a group of employees of the Federal Security Service of Russia (formerly KGB)* headed by Andrey Dmitrievich Polonchuk—colonel of SVR FSB of Russian Federation (information about his rank refers to 2000-2004). Therefore, it is possible to find offers on the Internet (in different languages) to purchase information from the Catalog of human population, even though this information is in no way related to the Catalog or to natural human "software."
Such offers can be found at the following websites: in Russian – Mountains and Seas of Self-Knowledge, Catalog of Human Population (Catalog of Mountains and Seas), Find The Answer Within Yourself, Yaroslav Davydov’s personal profile on Facebook, Catalog of Human Population; in English – Shan Hai Jing Lab/Shan Hai Jing Laboratory, and; etc.
Since only developers of Catalog of human population—Andrey Davydov and his research partner Olga Skorbatyuk—are official, legitimate authors of intellectual property** in the form of:
1. Images of human programs and manipulation modes from the ancient Chinese treatise Shan Hai Jing as the Catalog of human population
2. Decryptions of human programs and manipulation modes from the ancient Chinese treatise Shan Hai Jing as the Catalog of human population
3. Birth dates of manipulation modes from the ancient Chinese treatise Shan Hai Jing as the Catalog of human population
4. Other information related to fundamental research under the title of Catalog of human population (for example, methods of activation of program images of a human from ancient Chinese treatise Shan Hai Jing, and so on.)
—all others engaged in provision (selling) of this information are fraudsters. Some of them use names of children of developers of the Catalog in their criminal activity; for example, the name Yaroslav Davydov. Moreover, those who belong to the latter category are not only fraudsters, but also killers. They are those dregs, who attempted to kill Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk*. This group includes, for example, the following people:
Alexandr Gritsak (, Alexey Sobolev (,, Anton Sobolev (, Olga Apenko (married name Soboleva -,,, Igor Shushlyapin (,, Rasul Rizvanov (,, Natalia Hramtsova (,, Mikhail Zotin (,, Nadezhda Abramova (
Human Population Academy and its employees, as well as 3rd parties legally contracted (in writing) are the only ones legally authorized to offer this information (note: all informational materials made available through Human Population Academy are always provided to the client either by the Academy or by the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls).
It is extremely dangerous to buy a product offered by fraudsters. Since some time back Andrey Davydov suspected that sooner or later, in one form or another piracy will occur and made some inaccuracies in materials related to Shan Hai Jing; without taking them into account it is impossible to correctly put together the base material. Perhaps, after realizing this A. D. Polonchuk’s group decided to get at least some, at least material benefits from stolen works and this is how a strange, ugly product was born (and is being sold, for example, at,,, which has nothing to do with information from the Catalog of human population as the decrypted ancient Chinese monument Shan Hai Jing.
The consequence of this is that those, who get information from fraudsters cause irreparable damage to their health; both physical and psychical. Unfortunately, our laboratory already has a significant amount of information about cases when people, who requested information from the Catalog of human population from those, who officially have nothing to do with this research, experienced serious damage in various matters and of varying degree of severity. The reason for this is the fact that human psychophysiology functions on the basis of images. Therefore, if a person receives images and decryptions (which essentially are images as well), which are in no way related to his/her personal psychophysiology and begins to use this information on practice, then consequences might be as follows:
- psychical disorders of any kind, which cannot be cured
  • somatic disorders of any kind, which cannot be cured
- death, as a result of psychical and physiological disorders
Therefore, please be careful. You have every right to turn to anyone for information from the Catalog, but we issued this warning and we will not be held responsible in any way for possible consequences of your decisions.Developers of the Catalog of human population Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk, as well as the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls, the Human Population Academy and the Academy’s director Kate Bazilevsky officially state that they refuse to be and will not be held responsible for any consequences resulting from any person’s or organization’s communication with and reception of information from fraudsters, who present themselves as developers of the Catalog of human population (Catalog of Human Souls) and/or as legally authorized to offer information from the Catalog. Those who use names of Andrey Davydov’s and Olga Skorbatyuk’s children (Yaroslav A. Davydov***, Vasilisa A. Davydova, Elena Y. Skorbatyuk) in their criminal activities fall under the category of fraudsters as well. Our complete Terms and Conditions can be found here.****
* Details of the political case of developers of the Catalog of human population (Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk) can be learned from a book by Kate Bazilevsky titled Shan Hai Jing—A Book Covered With Blood. The Story Of Developers Of The Catalog Of Human Population. (HPA Press, 2014. ISBN 9781310766732).
** Andrey Davydov and Olga Skorbatyuk are the only developers of the Catalog of human population. This Copyright is registered with, for example, the United States Copyright Office at the Library of U.S. Congress. Etc.
*** Andrey Davydov’s son—Yaroslav A. Davydov—is not a developer of the Catalog of human population, and is not in any way affiliated with the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—CHS or the Human Population Academy. Yaroslav A. Davydov is not legally authorized to distribute information from the Catalog of human population and to offer his personal developments related to the ancient Chinese treatise Shan Hai Jing as the Catalog of human population. Activities that occur under this name and are directed at distribution of any kind of information from the Catalog of human population are fraudulent and illegal.
**** The Laboratory and the Academy reserves the right to deny access to information from the Catalog of human population to any person or organization without explanation of reasons. Also, note that if a person (or organization) contacts the Laboratory or the Academy after receiving information about his/her own or another person’s program, manipulation modes, images, etc. from any other source besides the Laboratory and developers of the Catalog or the Academy–the Laboratory and the Academy reserve the right to:
1. Deny access to information from the Catalog of human population (Catalog of Human Souls).
2. Demand compensation from such correspondents for the acquired analytical material (or service) in the amount of at least twice as much as our price prior to considering the question of providing information from the Catalog of human population.
3. Involve such correspondents as witnesses of crime related to copyright infringement of intellectual property of the Laboratory and developers of the Catalog of human population.
-Is it necessary to specify the time of birth of a person about whom I’m ordering information from the Catalog of human population or not?
We do not request that you specify the time of birth when ordering information from the Catalog of human population because the time of birth does not matter, unless a person was born close to midnight. However, when you are ordering information about someone, we recommend that you have this kind of information about that person. And, we strongly request that you let us know if a person, about whom you wish to receive information, was born close to midnight (between 11:30 PM to and 12:30 AM) in order to avoid reception of incorrect information from us.
-The Chinese calendar differs from our calendar. How is it possible that this system works?
The issue of differences in calendars has long been successfully resolved by the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population, research supervisor of our laboratory Andrey Davydov when he created the technology for decryption of Shan Hai Jing, a book which turned out to be the Catalog of human population. This technology was verified through Russian scientific institutions back in the 90s of the last century. As it is known, verification of scientific research is the proof that a scientific theory or technology work. Not to mention that the Catalog is being used in practice for over 15 years (from the date of verification), and has been used extensively by government structures of Russian Federation, such as the Federal Security Service, the State Duma, etc. More on this can be found in the following books: Ideology of Religions by A. Davydov and O. Skorbatyuk and Shan Hai Jing–A Book Covered With Blood. The Story Of Developers Of The Catalog Of Human Population. by K. Bazilevsky. It is not difficult to understand that structures at such level do not use technologies that do not work. By the way, as you are planning to place an order, probably to some degree you have already tested out the possibilities of our product using free demos presented on our website, have you not?
-If the technology of decryption of the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing really works, why money back guarantee is not offered?
Firstly, from our point of view, the fact that we do not offer refunds for any information from the Catalog of human population that the client received is not in any way logically related to the question of resolving someone's doubts. The suggestion to provide this option to our clients also lacks logic since it is the same as asking for an option to get a refund for a sandwich, which has already been eaten.
We have not seen a single producer of sandwiches that works like that, probably because such a company would immediately become bankrupt. However, if you came across such precedents, please let us know addressеs of places that work like this, as we will be happy to go there every day and get our money back after eating.
To answer this unserious question seriously: our decision was based only on that we have things to do and have neither time nor desire to deal with fraudsters.
-Why does information from the Catalog of human population cost so much?
From our point of view, this is a very strange question, as there is a huge number of products, price of which is much higher than the requested price for, for example, a decryption of a human program. Here are some examples of such products: computers of high quality, cars, jewelry, real estate, and so on. And, note that people with different incomes find money to purchase such goods at least once in their lifetime. Even in countries with quite low average income (for example Russian Federation) there is probably not a single person, who has not purchased something for $500 at least once in his life—this would be absurd. As for United States of America or European Union countries—there are practically no adults, who do not have a personal car, and, at least in United States, $1,500 is the cost of, for example, monthly rent for a very mediocre place. It is necessary to note that all products mentioned above cannot provide a person with that what knowledge of his/her own or someone else's individual program provides.
Prices for analytical materials that we developed are not based on this product’s value. And, they are not even based on calculations related to cost of labor to produce them. Since a decryption of 1 program or 1 manipulation mode from Shan Hai Jing takes multiple people a few weeks of work. And, this costs much more than $1,495 or $3,000. Not to mention how much time was spent on, for example, uncovering of the schedule of appearances of subtype structures of biological type Homo sapiens, on creation of technology to decrypt Shan Hai Jing and testing of this technology in experiments. This took decades.
Therefore, prices for information from the Catalog of human population are based only on making this information accessible to the maximal possible number of people in the world. Since the goal of the Special Scientific Info-analytical Laboratory—Catalog Of Human Souls and the Human Population Academy is to make information from this Catalog available for access by people. Specifically for this reason this product is being sold at such a low price, which is absolutely inadequate to its value.
-Is this method related to NLP programming?
No, it is not related in any way.
-My friends also became interested in the Catalog of human population. And, many people are asking me questions because I have been using the Catalog for a few years now. However, I do not know how to explain some things (not so much to them, but to myself). For example, there is this one woman whose question brought me to an impasse, as she said that she knows a person, who was born on the same day as she was, but they are not similar. Is this because she “lies, as a woman?” Or do people perceive themselves incorrectly (from suppressing or balancing modes, for example)?
First of all, you are absolutely correct in your suppositions. Naturally, a person, who does not know his/her natural program, tends to imagine himself/herself an individual from his suppressing mode or balancing mode. A sense of self as an individual from his/her natural program does not cause him/her to feel the same narcotic-pleasant feelings, as the "dream mode." This is why they fantasize in regard to themselves.
Also, you absolutely correctly identified that she "lies, as a woman." One of the well-known postulates of artificial software of women is the following: "A woman always lies. A woman who does not lie is sick." And so, women lie. And, like your friend, they are convinced that they are healthy. Although with regard to their health everything is exactly the opposite. They are not healthy, and even that is an understatement. However, anyway, all women do this, and they are not aware of that they are automatically executing the program of artificial software, which, using the computer language, was "installed" in them in the distant childhood, and on the basis of which they live like zombies.
Plus, often they do this quite consciously (both women and men), as they are so deathly afraid that someone might know what they are like real that they naively think that their "negative opinion" might make someone doubt the existence of the Catalog of human population; even though such expectations are very naïve.
Secondly, you and I do not personally know that person, with whom she supposedly compared herself. And, even if he/she does exist, we did not see his/her passport or other ID. Since it happens quite often that a person was told 20 times about the difference between people, who were born on the same day in the same month and one was born in a leap year and the other in a common year, but he/she did not even remember this and compared himself/herself with a person belonging to a different subtype structure, and then stated that they are not like each other.
Finally, let’s not forget that people, who were born with the same subtype program, mostly live not according to their program, but on the basis of that artificial "software," which was forcibly "installed" in them by parents and upbringers. And, parents (or people, who replaced parents) "installed" nothing other than a part of their own personal natural "software." This was done by the following guidance, which is known to everyone: "Do as I do!" (If you have not yet read the book Ahnenerbe—Your Killer Is Under Your Skin—this phenomenon is described in there in detail.) As a result, two people, who were born on the same day (taking leapness of birth year into account), live according to programs of their mothers and fathers instead of their own natural program, and their parents are people, who have different subtype programs. As a result, two people, who were born on the same day (taking leapness of birth year into account), despite that they belong to the same subtype—seem different.
However, "seem" does not mean that it is really like this. Since artificial "software" of a person is always "on the surface." It was created in order to be "worn as a mask," to demonstrate it in society, to cover up a person’s true, natural qualities by hiding "his/her true face" behind it. To a great extent, people are forced to hide manifestations of their natural programs because they do not fit into the narrow confines prescribed by society. Therefore, sometimes it is very difficult for a nonprofessional to see, to fully notice manifestations of a natural program.
Everyone, even those people, who are not psychologists, are familiar with manifestations of artificial "software," both from personal life experience and from many books on psychology (which do not describe true psychology of people, but only mechanisms and manifestations of artificial software—nothing more). In order to qualitatively monitor manifestations of natural "software" of a person, it is necessary to have a description of this subtype, or at least know images of his/her natural program from the Catalog of human population. Without having knowledge of your own natural program, someone else’s natural program, all the details related to different types of human "software"—it is an impossible task to monitor something. And, how can any comparisons be made without doing qualitative monitoring first?
-If the Catalog of human population was discovered in the ancient Chinese manuscript, then maybe it describes only Chinese people, and not Americans, Europeans, etc.?
In the mythologies of all cultures of the world (those that continue to exist, as well as those that do not) exist facts that indicate that the Catalog of human population was present in these cultures. This is easy to trace if one carefully studies the ancient, archaic cultural layers. However, the source itself was preserved only in one culture—Chinese culture. This is not surprising because since time immemorial, the Chinese have a tradition, which calls not to destroy any books, any sources of information. Therefore, it is not important that this book was preserved only in Chinese. The important thing is that it was preserved.
-You state that when a considered person, who provides his/her date of birth, he/she is identified as a subtype structure, according to phenological cycles. What about shifts of planets, stars, which appeared many thousands of years before the time when Shan Hai Jing appeared in this civilization?
As it is known from astronomy, one of peculiarities of stars is that their visible shifts in the celestial sphere are extremely small. Although a slow change in the mutual positioning of the stars was proven—the distortion of familiar shapes of constellations will become visible only after tens of thousands of years. To some extent the ancient astronomers were right when they considered that positions of stars in the sky are stable.
-I’m going to purchase materials from the Catalog of human population in order to return my husband—he left and I’m left alone with a child. Is it enough to get the female version of decryption of his individual program and images of all of his manipulation modes (without decryptions, as they are not available)? I cannot imagine how images without a clear instruction might have an influence. Since there is no decryption, there is no clear descriptive instruction about what and how to do and what to say, and I’m not sure that without this something is possible. I apologize for being obtrusive and some obtuseness…
First of all, there is no need to apologize, as it is quite natural that you are unsure. It is understandable that at the moment you are not sure how to use information from the Catalog on practice, as well as how (meaning, without your efforts) this information influences human psyche. This is quite normal for a beginner.
Since you are ordering images from Shan Hai Jing, you will also get a free Instruction on how to study images. With this instructional material you will be able to start using the manipulation toolkit from the Catalog. There is no other way except for acting based on the principle "One can only do by doing." It is impossible to learn how to use the Catalog without using it on practice and without this there is no need to even know about the Catalog at all. And, if in the process you will have some problems and questions, then you can always contact us and get help for a price that is affordable for you.
However, with all the information that you will receive, you will be able to reach the goal that you set. Moreover, images from the Catalog of the human population, as images of "software of the soul" of a human, his/her unconscious—influence him/her, even on their own, with minimal involvement on your part. It is only necessary to know and transmit them. Images from Shan Hai Jing are very powerful. You simply never came across their influence and so it is difficult for you to imagine this. However, you will see it with your own eyes, if you start working with them.
Moreover, you will have one of the decryptions of your husband’s structure—his individual program. This material is quite voluminous (about 30 pages of text), and it describes in detail the role that you will have to act out every time you meet, communicate with your husband. The result of your acting (transmissions of individual program of your man) will be that soon enough he will feel that you are his "soul mate." And, this is a lot since in this civilization people are not spoiled by meeting their "other half," as they call it. They do not even know their own natural programs. And, here you are, a person, who knows his natural program, who acts out his "half," and not just any, but a true "soul mate." What do you think: are there many people, who will be able to resist this? Our many years of experience have shown that no one can resist this. Therefore, if a decryption of suppressing manipulation mode is not available—knowledge of individual (subtype) program of a person and transmission of his/her own (natural) qualities towards him help solve problems similar to yours.
-Prior to ordering materials from the Catalog of human population, it would be desirable to have an opportunity to test this information. I already looked at demos presented on the website and they interested me, but demos contain a very small amount of information about a person and I would like to have more information so that I can test how the Catalog works. Do I really have to pay in order to test?
Probably you are not taking into account two key points when you are posing this question.
1. Neither the Academy, nor the developers of the Catalog are interested in anyone’s testing of how the Catalog of human population works. Since verification of this scientific researcher already took place in Russia back in the 90s of last century. And, as for us, our many years of personal experience, including work with clients, have already shown and proven everything to us.
2. Neither the Academy, nor the developers of the Catalog engage in proving something to someone.
Therefore, if someone wants to test whether the Catalog exists or not—he/she will do it using his/her own money. For those, who have problems with finances or do not want to pay in order to test, we provided free demos. There are over 100 demos, and this is more than enough. And, this is quite logical since a car dealership allows you to test-drive a car, but no one gifts it to a client only so that he/she can make sure that the car functions. This is absurd, nonsense. And, we do not engage in nonsense.
And, if someone does not want to spend his/her money on testing, then he/she can continue to "eat information" from astrological prognoses. We have nothing against this, this is their right. However, it is not our problem.
-I already purchased descriptions of some people from Catalog of human population from you and I’m going to purchase one more description soon, but I don’t fully understand: is the price $1,490 for decryptions of programs and manipulation modes a temporary price?
You are absolutely correct: the price that you paid for decryptions is temporary. Regular price of decryptions of human programs and manipulation modes from the Catalog of human population is $3,000.00. We hope that you will not be late and place your orders before the discount ends.
-I’m a woman. Should I order a female or male manipulation scenario?
Selection of gender of a manipulation scenario depends on the client’s goal:
1. SELF-KNOWLEDGE - If a person wants to get his/her personal natural manipulation modes in order to become inaccessible to manipulation and in order to be able to regulate his/her psyche and physiology, then the gender of a manipulation scenario can be any—it does not need to match gender of the client.
2. CONTROL OF ANOTHER PERSON - In this case, gender of a manipulation scenario matters.
- Suppressing Manipulation Mode - If a client wants to manipulate another person through application of his/her suppression mode and use the sexual factor, then the gender of a manipulation scenario must match the client's gender. If the client is not interested in sexual relations with a subject of manipulation (for example, business contacts, etc.), then the client can order the suppressing manipulation mode scenario of any gender.
- Balancing Manipulation Mode – In this case, the rule is the same as with the suppressing manipulation mode.
- Stimulating Manipulation Mode - Gender of the stimulating manipulation mode scenario depends on the goal of manipulation. In some cases, it must match gender of the client, while in others—gender of the scenario must match gender of the subject of manipulation.
More information about application of manipulation modes is available in the book series titled Catalog of Human Souls and through consultations (see ID 10 at


-I purchased a description of the suppression mode of my husband (Suppressing manipulation mode and images from Shan Hai Jing (but of a different subtype structure, not of this mode). I began to study them, but experienced some difficulties with both understanding of images and this scenario. I don’t understand why; I have a degree in liberal arts, a great interest in psychology, and I read a lot. In addition, it is stated on your website that it is very easy to act out manipulation scenarios. I am having doubts about this since in this case it is necessary to transform into another person. How is this easy if you are not a professional actor? I apologize for possibly a stupid question.
There is no need to apologize for lack of understanding of some of the aspects, as this is quite normal for a person, who just began getting acquainted with the Catalog of human population.
It is also quite natural that there are some difficulties when working with images from Shan Hai Jing and ID 2. However, as you will probably concur, there is hardly any kind of knowledge or skills, in which a beginner does not face any difficulties.
However, no matter how difficult use of the Catalog of human population seems at first—it is not necessary to complicate it. We can only repeat that it is easy to use manipulation scenarios from the Catalog of human population on practice. After all, the most difficult in manipulation of another person is to know what role to act out to which person in order to influence him/her. With manipulation scenarios from the Catalog things are much easier—just use it.
As for your conclusion that it is necessary to have some professional acting skills in order to act out a role of natural human manipulation modes—you are mistaken. All people in this civilization, without exception, play roles every day and everywhere (at work, at home, among friends, etc.), posing themselves as someone they are not without problems, even though not all of them are professional actors.
Of course, as the saying goes, "there is no limit to perfection," and the more professionally a person transforms when he/she plays a role—the better. However, in any case, there is a diapason: from simple skills to mastery—in any undertaking, and in acting out manipulation scenarios as well. At the simplest level no special acting skills and knowledge whatsoever are necessary in order to act out manipulation scenarios from the Catalog of human population. Just play the role of a person from the suppression (or any other) mode in the same that you play the role of a super-specialist, conscientious worker, loyal, friendly and industrious employee at your workplace, an exemplary family man to your wife, and "head over heels" in love to your lover. Note that everyone is capable of this.
And, if you cannot demonstrate something—simply say it, attributing to yourself that what you do not have: personality traits, preferences, talents, wealth, views. In this civilization, where people lie 24 hours a day 7 days a week—every person knows how to do it, and without taking any acting classes. The same is required of a person, who acts out natural manipulation modes to someone. You are "no one and your name is nobody?" No problem, the important thing is that you talk about how influential, powerful you are. You never in your life engaged in windsurfing? Just say that it is your favorite hobby, but you just have no time. You never take showers several times a day? Just say that you simply cannot live without taking a shower several times a day. As you can see everything is simple, familiar and anyone can do this.
This level of acting is quite enough for a manipulation scenario to work and for you to get results. And, if you want this process to be more effective—then learn. In other words, the same rule applies here, as with any type of human activities. There is nothing extraordinary here.
Yes, if you want to manipulate a person it is necessary to know "by heart" how to behave and what to do according to a manipulation scenario. However, what is extraordinary in that? All types of human activities require exact sequential execution of a series of actions and instructions. Even to prepare a simple cake it is necessary to act according to the recipe, otherwise it will turn out inedible. In order to brush your teeth, not your shoes, it is necessary to place a toothbrush in your mouth, and put toothpaste on it, not shoe polish.
The same principle applies everywhere: study, learn, practice. So far, humanity has not invented any other principles to learn something new.
And, how does learning the Catalog of human population differ from learning, for example, medicine? Students study anatomy, physiology, etc., and then they engage in practicums. Why does learning the Catalog of human population, which describes an even more complex structure of a human—his psyche—should be easier? And, what are such suppositions based on?
-I’m a professional psychologist. I bought a description of the individual (subtype) program of people born on … from Catalog of human population and wanted to check if this description is similar to real people who were born on the same day (accounting for leap/common years of birth). I found that very accurate information is given in the general description of an individual. However, some of the things from information on 6 factors did not apply to some people. For example, some nutritional habits, attitudes towards money, profession—did not coincide. How can you explain this?
There could be a few reasons. For example, as you probably already noticed yourself (that is, if you purchased images of individual programs)—human programs have the image "nephrite" ("jade"). And, this image is in natural programs of many Homo sapiens subtypes. "Nephrite" makes a person strictly follow the guidance (philosophy, way of life), which parents (or those people who replaced them) gave him/her during childhood.
If the image of "nephrite" is in the individual program of people, or even in some of their personal manipulation modes (suppressing or balancing), then during childhood these people, like sponges, absorbed and adopted program peculiarities of their parents/upbringers. (This issue, as well as questions related to artificial software (influence of which on human psyche should also be taken into account), are described in detail in the book titled Ahnenerbe: Your Killer Is Under Your Skin.)
However, to consider one of the examples you mentioned (attitude towards money)—we do not know if psychologists, who work without the Catalog are familiar with this phenomenon, but those psychologists, who use the Catalog in their practice, know about "nephrite," and the existence of 2 types of "software" of Homo sapiens (natural and artificial) and know very well that such a phenomenon as "financial ceiling" (which includes attitude towards money) gets set specifically by parents; and, this quality might not relate to natural (program) qualities of an individual.
The same can be stated about nutrition. After all, how and what to eat, a person, who does not know his natural program either learns from his/her parents or tries to copy someone's eating habits, or lives according to advices of those (nutritionists, etc.), who do not know anything about him/her; plus, plenty of diets that he/she thought-up (or took from philosophical-religious systems, which, in essence, is the same thing). In the end, a person, who has an image of an animal that eats only meat in his program, becomes a vegetarian. The result is always sad—weakness, decreased activity, bad mood, and then diseases of various systems of the organism that do not receive those nutrients, which can be obtained only from meat products. Are you not familiar with similar cases?
And, how many cases exit when parents force (or convince) children to eat that food, which they eat themselves, and then get surprised that children are overweight and unhealthy? But, what do all these perversions have to do with natural "software?"
As for the choice of profession—in this area, civilization offers a solution to problems based on strange, to put it mildly, methods: "The same for everyone", "Find yourself on your own", "Hit or miss," etc. The result is that people "follow the footsteps of parents" or choose "the most demanded (prestigious) specialties" from the list because they do not know their natural functionality, what their natural inclinations and talents are, and in which professional fields to realize them.
As a result, most people become "disillusioned" with their chosen profession, and, at times, quite quickly. However, time that they lost and money spent on education cannot be returned, and so they are forced to work according to the chosen specialty (sometimes for the rest of their lives) and during lunchtime say to their colleagues: "I always wanted to be a musician."
People become "disillusioned" only because by nature they are not inclined towards this kind of activity. And, this means that they engage in their specialty with great difficulty (although to someone it would be very easy), it brings them a lot of negativity, and they are unable to be successful in it—a fish cannot fly like a bird, and a bird cannot exist in the depths of a sea like a fish. And so on. But again: what does this have to do with the Catalog of human population?
As it turned out, by nature a human is a bio-robot. This means that a human can neither function, nor even live without programs. Consequently, those people, who do not know their natural programs described in Shan Hai Jing, are forced to live on the basis of other people’s or artificial programs. Meaning that they do not live their own lives, and, actually, they do not exist as individuals. They are zombies, clones. Fortunately, part of their natural program works "automatically" and they are alive because of this. It is this part that you, as a psychologist, can see in people from the group of those, who were born on the same day, and it will be the same for all. And, this is what your experiment confirmed.
-Question 1: I’ve already received from you materials about my individual natural program (decryption) and decryptions of all 3 of my manipulation modes. Since I have decryptions, why do I need to know images, on the basis of which these decryptions were made? Don’t decryptions have everything or I’m wrong? AND Question 2: If I purchase some information from the Catalog of human population, does this mean that I’ll have to study something on my own as well? And, is any help included in the cost of materials from the Catalog?
These 2 questions are merged into one because, in essence, they contain the same underlying question: "Why should I study something if developers of the Catalog of human population are doing it for me?" As with all questions related to independent study of information that is presented in the ancient Chinese manuscript Shan Hai Jing—every person decides for himself/herself what and how much to study. Only one rule works here: if you want to know—study, if you do not want to study—you will not know.
Every person decides for himself/herself what amount of knowledge he/she wants to have. In principle, if you have a description of your individual program from the Catalog, then you can rightfully state: "I know myself." If you know someone else's individual program, you can also state with certainty that you know that person. And, if you have someone's manipulation modes in the form of manipulation scenarios—you can do whatever you want with that person. The vast majority of people in this civilization do not possess even this amount of knowledge. And, if you want to expand the amount of knowledge you have about yourself, then study images of your own program, and if you do not want—do not study.
However, in order to make the right decision—to learn more or not to learn—it is necessary to know the following. Despite being detailed, any decryption, as a description of a particular human subtype, is still only a small piece of information about the program of that subtype. Shan Hai Jing contains such a huge amount of information about each subtype structure that by volume a description of just one of them could exceed an encyclopedia of many volumes.
However, at the present moment, creation of a multi-volume description of each Homo sapiens subtype is not possible because it would take a lot of time and effort, while the Catalog contains descriptions of not just the first level of programs (with which people are born), but also a lot of other interesting and important information.
For this reason, from the start of creation of the Catalog of human population, it was decided to decrypt programs of subtypes fully, but at the same time to provide the most important, essential information in a description; information, from which a person could recognize himself/herself in a description (or, if a description applies to another person, it would be possible to recognize him/her) and, of course, information that could be used in practice, in everyday life.
Such descriptions usually contain about 30 pages for each of 4 modes; about 120 pages of text in total. It is enough for a description—a whole book. And, images of individual human programs and manipulation modes are available to those, who would like to learn more about themselves or another person.
It is very interesting and useful to know images of an individual program (or a manipulation mode) when one already has the decryption of this program (or manipulation mode); and, especially for those, who want to learn to understand images of human "software" described in Shan Hai Jing. Images will allow you to better understand where certain personality traits that are described in decryptions come from. However, it is especially important to know images in order to act out a role in manipulation.
In short, knowing images, by which a particular individual program or manipulation mode is recorded, one can get incredibly huge amount of various information (meaning, on all 6 factors) in addition to a received decryption.
Do you personally need this information, meaning—do you want to study yourself in-depth and know yourself in tiniest nuances (and thus, have an opportunity to use all of your natural potential), or are you satisfied with knowledge about yourself that you received from us—this is not for us to decide. Therefore, the formulation "need to know images" is not correct, as no one needs it except you.
As for assistance in independent study of individual programs, manipulation modes and images from Shan Hai Jing—it is included in the price of materials only when a person orders images. In this case, he/she receives a free Instruction document about how to study these images. As for other kinds of help—there are 2 types, and they are priced separately:
1. Consultations (see ID 10 here)
2. Studying at the Human Population Academy
-I got my individual natural program and all of my 3 manipulation modes from the Catalog of human population. However, why do my friends say that it would also be good to know programs of my parents? What for? After all, you state that children are not antenna-like continuations of their parents?
If we consider active and passive of a natural program of a human as a base and weft of fabric (i.e. foundation, basis), then, as it is known, it is possible to apply paint onto fabric, to weave in additional threads, to decorate it with lurex, beads, etc. The same thing happens with the natural program of every person in this civilization where parents raise their children without the Catalog of human population.
Not knowing the natural program their child and not even suspecting that their children are not their antenna-like continuations (as it is the case with animals)—parents raise them based on a single principle: "Do as I do!" A variety of tinsel gets hung on a human program, like decorations on a Christmas tree. Moreover, this "tinsel" gets hung forcibly since this usually occurs at an age when children are completely dependent on their parents and are unable to contradict them.
The result of unbringing in the form of "Do as I do!" and why it is extremely harmful to human psychophysiology is described in detail in the book titled Ahnenerbe: Your Killer Is Under Your Skin. However, more important here is that each parent has his/her personal natural program and he/she is unable to pass on to a child anything else besides it. For this reason, many of those people, who study not only other people’s, but also, first of all, their own "software," order decryptions or images of individual programs of their mother and father. This way they know exactly what personality traits, life algorithms, etc. were forcibly set in them, can sort their own from not theirs at all and get rid of harmful waste.
-I purchased a description of the individual (subtype) program of my girlfriend and recognized her in the decryption. The only problem is that she has a twin sister (dizygotic), and I noticed that they are not like each other. How can this be, if they were born on the same day, and so they have the same natural program?
As it is known, it has long been noticed that fates of twins are often closely connected or similar, and that many twins, even when they were separated since birth, can have the same habits, get into similar situations, have the same diseases and even die at the same time. However, this rule does not always work. The reason is that if twins were born within one 24-hour period (and sometimes it is not the case), then they as if share the natural (subtype) program, and one gets the active part of the program, and the other—passive.
Since active and passive of the program of each one of 293 subtypes of Homo sapiens are recorded by completely different images, which give different personality traits, abilities, life algorithms, preferences, etc.—twins might differ from each other in all these parameters.
Unfortunately, if this is the case with the situation that you described, then you cannot see these sisters separately—as active and passive—from the decryption of the program of your girlfriend. Probably you would recognize one of them in the description of the active part of the program, and the other one—in the description of the passive. However, any decryption is a certain "fusion," where the active and passive of the program are tied together. Therefore, the only way to see the passive and the active (separately) is to find out images of this subtype program. However, it is never too late to get images of the program of your girlfriend.
A second possible reason that twins might differ in character is that the time of their birth was at the junction of two 24-hour periods. In this case, programs of different subtypes turn on in each one of them at the moment of cutting of the umbilical cord. For example, assuming that birthing occurred normally, and in this case usually the time between birth of first and second twin is 20-30 minutes—the first twin was born at 11:45 PM, and the second at 12:15 AM. This is also a possibility, especially since in many cases birthing of twins occurs with complications and the process of birthing of the second child might be delayed.
Therefore, if you state that your girlfriend and her twin sister are not alike at all—they either each got one half of the subtype program, or if they were born at the junction of two 24-hour periods—they have different subtype programs. It is difficult to say which case applies in your situation since you have not provided time of birth of each of the sisters.
-I ordered the material called Dates Of Manipulation Modes several times (to find a suitable life partner, to better act out the role of the suppression mode, etc.), and each time I got 2 dates for each mode (leap and common years). But now I ordered dates again and there is only one date of suppression mode. Why is that? Could this be a mistake? I ordered dates of a person born on…
Since we are discussing the date of birth that you specified—there is no mistake. Yes, more often than not it happens that when a client orders dates of manipulation modes he/she receives 2 dates for each mode, one of which is a leap year and the other—a common year. However, in your case, suppression mode happened to be in the month of January, and there can be only one date in this month.
-I’m a professional psychologist. I purchased a description of subtype program of several people born on the same day, whom I tested by traditional psychological methods. I read the description, compared it with information that I got without the Catalog and was a bit surprised that I did not learn a lot of new information about these people.
Of course, it is always a pleasure to communicate with professionals in their field. However, did you consider that developers of the Catalog, who provided this information to you, have never met any of the people from your group? Moreover, it is very likely that they have never in their lives met any person born of this date?
People request information from the Laboratory about those, who the developers of Catalog have never met. Meaning that, unlike you, the developers are not able to observe this person, see how she/he lives and functions, talk with that person in order to find out some information, and so on.
When verification of this research was carried out in Russia in the 90s of XX century, psychologists compared data about subjects that they received from the Catalog of human population with data about subjects, which they obtained using traditional psychological methods. This means that they operated in the same way as you did.
Although this approach is quite strange from the point of view of a psychologist, who practices based on non-traditional psychoanalysis. In non-traditional analysis, after reception of information from the Catalog (even if you think that you studied a person well), it is necessary to observe him/her for some time, so to speak, with new information in hand.
-I ordered images of individual program of a woman, but I received a material titled Images Of The Individual Program Of People Born On… Why is this so?
Natural program of any of the human subtypes is recorded in psyche of Homo sapiens by images, which are the same for representatives of both genders. Since images are the same, then there is no principal difference between programs (manipulation modes) of men and women within the same human subtype.
What principal difference can there be between, for example, a male cat and a female cat or between a male dog and a female dog? It is the same way with people because at the basis of all human qualities are qualities of natural images.
The difference can be only in the sexual factor (sexual behavior, attitudes towards having children, etc.) and only if the program contains representatives of fauna. And, representatives of fauna (i.e. mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, etc.) as images are not present in every natural program of Homo sapiens.
-My colleagues and I (psychologists) got descriptions of different people from the Catalog of human population. We were somewhat surprised by the fact that programs of men and women do not differ in anything besides small details in the sexual factor. And, in some descriptions a difference between a woman and a man was not found at all. Although from a psychological point of view, there is a huge difference between opposite genders. How can this be explained?
The Catalog of human population describes natural human "software," and it should not be confused with artificial "software" that exists in this civilization. In this civilization, it is customary to assume that there is a difference between male and female psychology, meanwhile in nature there is no such difference or it is expressed in a completely different way.
In this civilization it is common to instill roles for women and men (for example, "women are weak and defenseless, and men are strong"), which by nature they do not have. In nature, male and female animals are not inferior to each other in anything, not in any one of their natural qualities—they are equally strong, fast, both find food (and hunt) equally well, or defend themselves against enemies, protect their territory, offspring.
Based on what was stated above, psychological difference between men and women is pure fiction, made up by psychologists as well. And, this question is clearly not to the Catalog of human population, as the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing that we are decrypting does not describe civilizational fabrications and perversions.
As for purely physiological difference between males and females in nature and men and women—this question is for physiologists, as the Catalog describes psyche, not physiology.
-I ordered two types of materials from Catalog of human population: a decryption (description) of an individual program of a person and a scenario the suppression mode of a person. I was surprised that the structure of both materials is absolutely the same: first, a general description of a person and then descriptions of 6 factors (intellectual, physical, nutritional, emotional, sexual and environmental). Is this how it should be?
Yes, the structure of all decryptions from the Catalog of human population is the same, regardless of whether it is someone's individual program or it is one of the manipulation modes; at least because each manipulation mode is also an individual program of some Homo sapiens subtype.
-Are there gender differences in such factors as the environmental factor, which lists types of activities that a person prefers, or in the physical factors, for example, in clothing?
Of course, women and men wear different clothes. However, algorithms of preferences are the same for both genders of one human subtype. If a description of an individual states that a person necessarily has red colored clothing items in his/her wardrobe, then it simply means that for a woman it might be a red skirt or a red bra, and for a man—a red tie.
Actually, the word "preferences," especially when it comes to professional activities, is not appropriate here because a human is a bio-robot and executes the natural program implanted in him/her; therefore, these are not preferences, but rather functionality. Functionality is the same as that of, for example, birds—to fly and fish—to swim; a person can do one thing, and to be totally unfit for something else. And, functionality is the same in both genders within one subtype.
-I’m confused because I received a manipulation scenario for my husband in the same format as my own individual program (I ordered 2 different materials). I thought that the manipulation scenario will have instructions on how to behave, and now I do not know how to use this material on practice.
Perhaps you missed the description of a decryption of suppressing and other manipulation modes in the Pricing section because it is stated there what this material contains. All that you need to do now is to play a woman from the description of the suppressing mode of your husband.
An individual from a description of any of the manipulation scenarios (no matter if it is suppressing, balancing or stimulating mode) must simply be acted out by a manipulator like a role. Meaning that he/she must demonstrate (or, if this is not possible, then simply declare) personality traits, preferences, life algorithms, and so on from this scenario—express thoughts and emotions like he/she does, dress and style hair like he/she does, eat what he/she eats, and everything else.
That is, conditionally speaking, if it is written in a scenario that this person is cheap, then you must demonstrate this quality in yourself, by any means and in any situation. If it is written there that this woman wears a red skirt and eats grapes, then you need to do this as well and exactly as described, without implementing any arrangements (changes). And so on.
-Could you please name the main principles of working with scenarios of human manipulation modes?
Acting out any manipulation scenario is based on the same principles as professional acting; meaning that you, as an individual, must disappear completely, and in your place must appear an individual described in the manipulation scenario. This is what is called "a complete transformation."
It is a pity that there is a catastrophically low number of actors of this level; even among the so-called "international movie stars." For this reason, film and theater are so boring—total falseness (meaning, unprofessionalism).
When transmitting a natural program and manipulation modes, this kind of falseness ends in a complete failure because the "viewer" (the person being manipulated) does not believe the manipulator. In this case, success depends only on you and all failures will be at your expense.
Moreover, acting out natural manipulation modes (as well as an individual program) of some person is always much more than acting of an actor on stage. Since your "viewer" will be getting used to the new you for some time (especially if you were acquainted for a long time), and will surely check—are you really his/her "soul mate?" And, he/she will check very thoroughly.
If the manipulator-"actor" does not know the manipulation scenario by heart and is not ready for full transformation, then the chance that a person he/she is manipulating will believe in his/her act is small. And here, success depends only on the manipulator.
-While reading the individual program of my wife, I thought: why I, a man, must act out such childish behavior to her? After all, my goal is for her to see her “second half”, “soul mate” in me, correct?
Yes, you are right, in order for the other person to feel that you are his/her, as it is said, "soul mate," to see in you a person, who is ideal for him/her—you must act like an individual from the description of his/her individual program. Even if you are not too comfortable acting out qualities of this individual, or these qualities are not characteristic of you personally, or you do not like them. And, you are absolutely correct in your suppositions that you will have to act out behavior of a child.
In order for a person to really feel that you are his/her "soul mate," it is necessary to transmit the whole manipulation mode (or an individual program, as in your case) in its entirety; and, not just one quality of personality (in your case, it is childish behavior), or several qualities. Acting in such way is a big mistake.
If you act out only some separate qualities to a person, and not the role (manipulation scenario) as a whole, "from A to Z," then the effect from the influence will be short-term and unstable, if any at all with such acting.
-I heard from my friends, who also use manipulation modes from the Catalog of human population, that in order to act out manipulation scenarios more easily and professionally and with a better result, it is also required to have images of this manipulation mode. Is this true?
Yes, this is true. Even having a manipulation scenario, but without having knowledge of images, which are behind this decryption, it would be complicated to qualitatively transform—meaning, to play a role—even for a very good professional actor. Due to this, our clients usually order a manipulation mode (or all modes), and, along with it, order images of this mode at the same time. Knowledge of images of a manipulation mode, on the one hand, is useful in order to understand what image is behind which quality and to act it out, and on the other hand—for a more qualitative transformation into another person. It is always easier to act out that what your intellect and your entire psychophysiology can perceive at the unconscious level. And, psychophysiology does not understand the language of words—it only understands the language of images. When qualitative acting of a manipulation mode occurs, if the manipulator knows images of this mode and acts them out, then psychophysiology of the person being manipulated easily picks up on this, and he/she begins to submit to you at a purely unconscious level. This does not always happen in a case when a manipulator does not know images of manipulation modes and acts out only qualities of personality from a manipulation scenario. Since acting out qualities is, of course, very good, but in this case, a manipulator might be tempted to arrange these qualities to himself/herself (meaning, to play a role as he/she likes or in a way he/she is comfortable), or simply to act them out in a way that is not similar to the original. This ruins results of manipulation very significantly. However, when in front of the inner eye of a manipulator are images of, for example, suppression mode of the person he/she is manipulating, then it becomes more difficult to arrange them or to make a mistake in how to transmit qualities of this individual. And then, the process of manipulation is always more effective.
-I was going to order the manipulation scenario (suppressing mode) of my boss because I am very concerned with my career advancement, but it was not available at the Laboratory, and so I purchased images of this mode. When I saw images from Shan Hai Jing, I understood that it will not be easy for me to play a role only based on them. Does everyone face this problem or am I the only one?
No, you are not the only one. It is also stated in F.A.Q. that, of course, manipulation of a person using only images without having a decryption of these images (meaning, a manipulation scenario) is somewhat more complicated, especially for amateurs in Non-traditional Psychoanalysis; since in order to do this, it is necessary to study images on your own. However, in a situation when a decryption of some program or a manipulation scenario is not available, it is much better to have images than not to have any information about a person of interest.
-I received the material titled Images Of Balancing Mode Of People Born On … , and I was a bit surprised that this material contains more than one page of text. Did I get the material that I ordered: description of images?
Do not worry—you received that material, which you ordered, as we check all orders prior to sending them to a client. The reason that this type of material might have more than one page is usually that someone's individual program or manipulation mode is recorded by a large number of images in the active or passive part.
Only we are a bit alerted by your definition—“description of images,” as there is no description present in this type of material from the Catalog of human population and should not be present. This type of material is just a list of images, by which a particular program or a manipulation mode is recorded.
-Please tell me: decryptions of individual programs and decryptions of manipulation modes, which I ordered, also will not contain differences between genders?
Yes, your suppositions are correct.
However, distinction between genders will be present because in case of an individual program of a person—we provide a description of a woman or a man, depending on gender of the person about whom the description was ordered. As for manipulation modes: since they are scenarios, which a client will need to act out—gender in a description must match gender of the client.
In cases when a person orders his/her own manipulation modes—the gender of individual in a manipulation scenario also must match the gender of the client because manipulation modes are part of structure of human psyche, and it is much more convenient this way since a person is able to see and recognize himself/herself, his/her behavior, his/her unconscious motivations and preferences right away.
-I’m a professional psychologist, I have an education in psychology and I’m writing a dissertation. Also, I studied philosophy at another university. Usually, I’m able to comprehend a new topic related to psychology quickly enough. However, this is not the case with the Catalog of human population. I’ve been “walking in circles” around this topic for over six months—I’ve been reading, watching, studying, thinking. I purchased materials about a loved one and studied them. Anyway, I feel that I still do not understand it well enough.
In this case, the quality of your intellect and how well educated you are—absolutely do not matter. We apologize for answering your question with a question, but how many years did you spend getting an education in those areas, in which you are now a professional? Probably it was not a few days, weeks, months, and possibly not just a couple of years? Then, why are you surprised that you do not have the knowledge and skills that developers of the Catalog acquired for decades (this research began in 1975)?
-I ordered and recently received images of the individual program of my child in order to better understand him and to raise him properly. Along with images I got a free instruction on how to study them and it helped me a lot. However, despite that I can understand how to transfer qualities of animals onto human qualities, I still cannot understand how to do this in cases of images of non-living objects: stones, metals, trees, and so on?
Everybody asks this question. However, we will start with that beginners are practically unable to absolutely correctly transfer qualities even of animals. To a varying degree, it is difficult to do both for beginners.
As for stones, for example, here it is simply necessary to study mineralogy and other sciences related to this natural object. And then, a person, who is trying to comprehend how to understand information about stones will learn that those people, who have this image are very, for example, dependent on influence of emotions of others towards them, and they as if get charged by them, and also always "give back" the emotion transmitted by someone to that same person or to any other person. This means that, if a person has the image "stone" ("stones") and you transmit aggression towards him/her—you will get aggression back, and if you transmit joy—you will get joy back.
And so on, as this is only one of properties of the image "stone"—just as an example. Here, it is necessary only to study nature and learn how to correctly transfer qualities of a particular natural object onto a person.
-I ordered images of balancing mode of my husband, plus a decryption of his suppressing mode. After taking a look at images that I already received (I’m still waiting for the decryption), it seems to me that once I get the decryption it will become much clearer how to study images. Am I right?
No, you are mistaken. This is not the most effective way to learn how to decrypt images of human programs and manipulation modes from Shan Hai Jing. In order to try to do this, it is necessary to have images and a decryption of these images of the same program or manipulation mode (not different, as it is the case with your order). Unfortunately, in your case, it is unlikely that this will help.
If you want to achieve at least a rough understanding of how to decrypt images from the ancient manuscript Shan Hai Jing, it is recommended to order 2 materials at the same time: images of a program or a manipulation mode and a decryption of images of that same program or that same manipulation mode.
Just do not think that this is the only thing that is required in order to learn how to decrypt images of human programs and manipulation modes. It takes people many years to learn how to do this, and not independently, but under the under the patronage of specialists in Non-traditional Psychoanalysis. However, in this case, you will certainly reach the goal that you set for yourself.
-I have a degree in psychology, I work with people, and from my perspective, the Catalog of human population, information from which you are offering, seemed very interesting to me. Of course, I understand that I am no expert in this, but I can imagine that if this Catalog provides information from the unconscious of a person, then it is very valuable, and also I think that knowledge of the suppression mode, which causes obedience in a person, is also very valuable. As for the stimulation mode, don’t you think that a good psychologist can do this without knowledge from the Catalog? Another matter is the mode of gaining trust, which you call “balancing mode,” as things are not so simple with this…
You are deeply mistaken. However, such mistakes are quite natural for a person, who never used natural human manipulation modes in practice.
“…As for the stimulation mode, don’t you think that a good psychologist can do this without knowledge from the Catalog? ...” Your opinion is not original, as all psychologists think this. However, then it is not clear why all of them always have such huge problems with that what is called "motivation?"
While the "secret" is simple: everybody knows that in order to stimulate different people to certain actions—different stimuli are necessary, but not everyone knows that 293 human subtypes exist in nature and that there is exactly the same number of stimulation modes. And, it is necessary to know them as opposed to guessing and trying one variant after another or trying to apply the same methodology for everyone.
As for the balance mode of a person, it is impossible to agree with you because with "the mode of gaining trust" (which, it should be noted, is just one of many effects that natural balance mode of a person provides) in reality everything is just as easy as with suppression and stimulation. All that is required is to know precisely what to transmit to which specific person.
-From my point of view, as a non-professional in matters related to the Catalog, the suppression mode is the most complex mode, and if the Catalog really works (I cannot say anything here, as I have not yet purchased any information from you), then the use of specifically the suppression mode will show its effectiveness best of all.
You are mistaken. First of all, neither one of human manipulation modes is more difficult to use than all others. All that is required in case of transmission of any one of human manipulation modes is to have the manipulation scenario, to act it out like a role, without making any adaptations, and to monitor reactions. It is also desirable to have images, by which the manipulation mode being used is recorded in the unconscious of the person you are manipulating.
Secondly, any one of manipulation modes can demonstrate effectiveness of use of information from the Catalog; especially if a person is a professional and knows at least how to monitor reactions of subjects.
Speaking of reactions… Without knowing the individual program of a person from the Catalog, even a good professional is not able to correctly interpret that what he/she sees. Since, again, 293 human subtypes exist in nature and each one is endemic, and reactions to any one of manipulation modes entirely depend on the subtype’s program. Therefore, it is desirable for the manipulator to have information about the individual (subtype) program of the subject of his/her manipulation.
However, this is probably quite complex for a beginner and cannot be explained in a nutshell. It probably makes sense for you to read the book devoted exclusively to natural human manipulation modes titled Human Manipulation Modes. Either You Are Manipulating Or You Are Being Manipulated (by Olga Skorbatyuk and Kate Bazilevsky).


-Why is information about the Catalog of human population available only on the Internet? You must agree that it is difficult to take seriously something about which information is available only there.
The Catalog of human population was presented and is being presented not only on the Internet. Any interested person can familiarize himself/herself with, for example, presentations made by the author of scientific discovery of the Catalog of human population Andrey Davydov, which were published in collections of abstracts, for example, of the First Russian Philosophical Congress. Scientific congress is not Internet. And, this was not the only presentation done by Andrey Davydov about the Catalog at scientific conferences, table discussions, etc.
In addition to scientific conferences, there were presentations about the Catalog of human population on Russian television, and in 2005 a series of popular science books (paper books) titled Manipulation Games For Women—Instruction For Exploitation Of Men (by Andrey Davydov, Olga Skorbatyuk) were published.
You can find a list of presentations and publications (on the Internet and not on the Internet) in the Publications section on our website.
-I’m in close contact with the scientific community, and, according to information that I found on the Internet about the Catalog, I get the impression that this is one of the branches of esotericism…
And, on what basis can the Catalog of human population be attributed to esotericism? After all, in order to categorize something, probably it is necessary to study the question at least minimally: the subject matter itself and the history of this phenomenon.
In the Publications section of our website, there are references, for example, to presentations by Andrey Davydov (the author of the discovery of the Catalog of human population) at academic conferences. According to the rules, each presentation of this kind gets included in a book of abstracts of this conference, which always gets published as a book. In the Publications section one can find a link to this collection, which is held at the library of one of Russian universities, as well as at libraries of universities of other countries. In it one can find abstracts of presentation made by Andrey Davydov. His presentation was titled Is Shan Hai Jing—The Original Catalog Of Psychophysiological Human Structure?" (Publications section also includes scans of this collection).
It is unlikely that people not familiar with the scientific environment know this, but if you state that you are well familiar with the scientific environment, then you must be aware of that non-members of scientific communities, or presenters with a subject from the category of "esotericism" are not allowed to speak at any scientific events. We do not know how it is in your country, but this is so in Russian scientific institutions. Or, is a publication by the publishing house of Saint Petersburg State University, which is available at electronic libraries from the category .edu in different countries not an indication of that this is scientific research?
And, as for categorizations—research of Shan Hai Jing is more appropriate for the category of Scientific Approach To Еesotericism.
-I’m a journalist and I’m ready to write an article about the Catalog, which will be published in the … magazine. However, in order to write it, I would like to be able to interview developers of the Catalog of human population and get some free materials.
No one is refusing to give an interview. For this purpose there exist and are successfully being used such systems as Skype, ooVoo, etc.
As for free materials from the Catalog of human population for journalists, they have already been presented— The most that a journalist, who decides to write an article about the Catalog can expect for free is images of his/her individual (subtype) program, which the Laboratory would not mind providing to him/her. However, it will be possible to discuss this after an article about the Catalog (and in a form approved by us) will be published. No one will provide any other materials from the Catalog to journalists for free.
However, to be honest, we are not very interested in your offer since, first of all, it is not a problem for us to write any article on our own. Secondly, none of the journalists, who are not familiar with the Catalog of human population on practice, is capable of writing an adequate article about the Catalog.
-Why are developers of the Catalog of human population and their colleagues opposed to cooperation with scientific and other public organizations?
First of all, on what grounds was the assumption made that developers of the Catalog of human population and their colleagues did not cooperate or do not cooperate with various public organizations? There is no mystery here. For example, information available here openly provides data about some public organizations, such as Russian universities and scientific research organizations, political organizations, law enforcement agencies and security services of Russian Federation. (Of course, this is not a complete list since the vast majority of organizations, which work closely with developers of the Catalog and their colleagues prefer not to advertise this.)
Secondly, why do you think that the staff of the Special Scientific Info-Analytical Laboratory—Catalog of Human Souls and the Human Population Academy are not open to new contacts? No one objected to this. Objected, object (and will object) only to that some try to fool us for over 20 years already—representatives of the academic environment, security services, politicians, businessmen. This refers to proposals to provide them information from the Catalog for free. Moreover, academic institutions, and even more so security services either have a sufficient budget or unlimited budget, and are capable of paying money for these materials, while all this time developers of the Catalog and their colleagues carry out their research exclusively at their own expense.


4 Responses

  1. Ben Tetschner

    Greetings! Your research seems amazing!

    I have two questions:

    1.) Can a person become a student of this academy? I saw an excerpt on Udemy about this, but am not sure if this was meant literally.

    2.) Is there any way I can get a little bit more of a demo for a male December 7, 1979? I am a personality systems nut, and I am ALMOST sold on this system….but maybe just a little more to confirm that it is accurate.

    I feel deeply sorry for you about the problems you have had with the government and that you had to move to save your lives. Unfortunately, there is a network of very powerful people that would love to hold onto this knowledge and not let anyone else know about it. They are beyond madness.

  2. nani daman news Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    It’s truly a nice and useful piece of info. I am glad that you just shared this
    helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this.
    Thanks for sharing.

Leave a Reply

Have you Subscribed via RSS yet? Don't miss a post!